* 21.11-staging branch @ 2024-08-28 12:37 Kevin Traynor 2024-08-28 19:31 ` Patrick Robb 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Kevin Traynor @ 2024-08-28 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patrick Robb; +Cc: ci, Lincoln Lavoie, Aaron Conole Hi Patrick, I pushed to the 21.11-staging branch twice over the last few days but the ci didn't get reported as running [0]. It's been a few months since it was used, so maybe we're hitting the timeout on clone again or something else. Would you be able to take a peek when you get a chance? thanks, Kevin. [0] https://dpdkdashboard.iol.unh.edu/results/dashboard/periodic_testing/?branch_id=16&page=0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 21.11-staging branch 2024-08-28 12:37 21.11-staging branch Kevin Traynor @ 2024-08-28 19:31 ` Patrick Robb 2024-08-28 19:56 ` Patrick Robb 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Patrick Robb @ 2024-08-28 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kevin Traynor; +Cc: ci, Lincoln Lavoie, Aaron Conole Hi Kevin, Yes, I see it was another set of timeouts. Let me take a look. Sorry about the inconvenience. On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 8:37 AM Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi Patrick, > > I pushed to the 21.11-staging branch twice over the last few days but > the ci didn't get reported as running [0]. > > It's been a few months since it was used, so maybe we're hitting the > timeout on clone again or something else. > > Would you be able to take a peek when you get a chance? > > thanks, > Kevin. > > [0] > https://dpdkdashboard.iol.unh.edu/results/dashboard/periodic_testing/?branch_id=16&page=0 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 21.11-staging branch 2024-08-28 19:31 ` Patrick Robb @ 2024-08-28 19:56 ` Patrick Robb 2024-08-30 12:20 ` Kevin Traynor 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Patrick Robb @ 2024-08-28 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kevin Traynor; +Cc: ci, Lincoln Lavoie, Aaron Conole Hi Kevin, I made some adjustments, did a manual trigger and the branch successfully cloned and checked out in 13 min, below our timeout. But, I am still a bit confused why this seems to pop up intermittently 1-2 times per year... We are going to be making some upgrades to our Jenkins instance in the short term, maybe that will bring more stability to this CI pipeline. Let me know the next time you push as I am interested to see if it's really "back to normal" or not. sorry for the half answer here. Best, Patrick On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 3:31 PM Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> wrote: > > Hi Kevin, > > Yes, I see it was another set of timeouts. Let me take a look. Sorry > about the inconvenience. > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 8:37 AM Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Patrick, > > > > I pushed to the 21.11-staging branch twice over the last few days but > > the ci didn't get reported as running [0]. > > > > It's been a few months since it was used, so maybe we're hitting the > > timeout on clone again or something else. > > > > Would you be able to take a peek when you get a chance? > > > > thanks, > > Kevin. > > > > [0] > > https://dpdkdashboard.iol.unh.edu/results/dashboard/periodic_testing/?branch_id=16&page=0 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 21.11-staging branch 2024-08-28 19:56 ` Patrick Robb @ 2024-08-30 12:20 ` Kevin Traynor 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Kevin Traynor @ 2024-08-30 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patrick Robb; +Cc: ci, Lincoln Lavoie, Aaron Conole On 28/08/2024 20:56, Patrick Robb wrote: > Hi Kevin, > Hi Patrick, > I made some adjustments, did a manual trigger and the branch > successfully cloned and checked out in 13 min, below our timeout. But, > I am still a bit confused why this seems to pop up intermittently 1-2 > times per year... We are going to be making some upgrades to our > Jenkins instance in the short term, maybe that will bring more > stability to this CI pipeline. > The only clue is that I don't see any issues during a release cycle when it's in use every few days etc. It seems to just happen after some months of inactivity. So not critical, as long as you don't mind getting an email about it 2 or 3 times a year ;-) > Let me know the next time you push as I am interested to see if it's > really "back to normal" or not. > I pushed this morning and it is working fine. > sorry for the half answer here. > Thanks for your quick help as usual, Kevin. > Best, > Patrick > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 3:31 PM Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> wrote: >> >> Hi Kevin, >> >> Yes, I see it was another set of timeouts. Let me take a look. Sorry >> about the inconvenience. >> >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 8:37 AM Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Patrick, >>> >>> I pushed to the 21.11-staging branch twice over the last few days but >>> the ci didn't get reported as running [0]. >>> >>> It's been a few months since it was used, so maybe we're hitting the >>> timeout on clone again or something else. >>> >>> Would you be able to take a peek when you get a chance? >>> >>> thanks, >>> Kevin. >>> >>> [0] >>> https://dpdkdashboard.iol.unh.edu/results/dashboard/periodic_testing/?branch_id=16&page=0 >>> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-30 12:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-08-28 12:37 21.11-staging branch Kevin Traynor 2024-08-28 19:31 ` Patrick Robb 2024-08-28 19:56 ` Patrick Robb 2024-08-30 12:20 ` Kevin Traynor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).