DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Tu, Lijuan" <lijuan.tu@intel.com>
To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.odriscoll@intel.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Jeremy Plsek <jplsek@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>,
	"marketing@dpdk.org" <marketing@dpdk.org>,
	Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>,
	Patrick MacArthur <pmacarth@iol.unh.edu>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-marketing]  Results are now public
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 02:29:19 +0000
Message-ID: <8CE3E05A3F976642AAB0F4675D0AD20E0B9BD2BC@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BAB77BA42C@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>

Agree, I would like to see some photos of the lab.
Should we add a brief introduction of contributors, this may attract more companies or individual to contribute to the lab.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ci [mailto:ci-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 6:14 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Jeremy Plsek
> <jplsek@iol.unh.edu>
> Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; ci@dpdk.org;
> marketing@dpdk.org; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>; Patrick
> MacArthur <pmacarth@iol.unh.edu>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-marketing] Results are now public
> 
> This looks good to me too. Some pictures would be nice, perhaps a snapshot
> of the dashboard some of the hardware in the lab. It would be good to get
> this posted on dpdk.org, and send a note to announce@dpdk.org to let
> people know about it.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 10:17 PM
> > To: Jeremy Plsek <jplsek@iol.unh.edu>
> > Cc: O'Driscoll, Tim <tim.odriscoll@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh
> > <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; ci@dpdk.org; marketing@dpdk.org; Lincoln
> > Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>; Patrick MacArthur
> > <pmacarth@iol.unh.edu>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-marketing] [dpdk-ci] Results are now public
> >
> > Looks great!
> > I think adding pictures would be nice for the blog.
> > Thank you
> >
> > 14/11/2018 22:07, Jeremy Plsek:
> > > With help from Lincoln and Patrick, below is an initial draft of the
> > blog post.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > DPDK Community Lab Publishes Relative Performance Testing Results
> > >
> > > The DPDK Community Lab is an open, independent testing resource for
> > > the DPDK project. Its purpose is to perform automated testing on
> > > incoming patch submissions, to ensure the performance and quality of
> > > DPDK is maintained. Participation in the lab is open to all DPDK
> > > project participants.
> > >
> > > For some time now, the DPDK Community Lab has been gathering
> > > performance deltas using the single-core packet I/O layer 2
> > > throughput test from DTS for each patch series submitted to DPDK
> > > compared to the master branch. We are pleased to announce that the
> > > Lab has recently been allowed to make these results public. These
> > > results are also now published to Patchwork as they are
> > > automatically generated. These results currently contain Mellanox
> > > and Intel devices, and the lab is able to support hardware from any
> > > DPDK participants wishing to support these testing efforts.
> > >
> > > To view these results, you can go to DPDK Community Lab Dashboard
> > > via the following link: https://lab.dpdk.org. The dashboard lists an
> > > overview of all active patch series and their results. Detailed
> > > results can be viewed by clicking on the patch series. If a patch
> > > fails to merge into master, a build log will show to help identify
> > > any issues. If a patch cleanly merges into master, performance delta
> > > results will show for each participating member.
> > >
> > > The Lab is hosted by the University of New Hampshire
> > > InterOperability Laboratory, as a neutral, third party location.
> > > This provides a secure environment for hosting equipment and
> > > generating unbiased results for all participating vendors. Lab
> > > participants, i.e. companies hosting equipment in the testing, can
> > > securely access their equipment through a VPN, allowing for
> > > maintenance and performance tuning, as the DPDK project progresses.
> > >
> > > The Lab works by polling the Patchwork API. When new patches are
> > > submitted, the CI server merges them with the master branch and
> > > generates a tarball. Each participating system unpacks and installs
> > > the DPDK tarball and then runs the performance testing against this
> > > DPDK build. When all systems have finished testing, the CI gathers
> > > the results into our internal database to be shown on the Dashboard,
> > > and sends final reports to Patchwork to show up on the submitted patch.
> > > This allows patch submitters to utilize Patchwork to view their
> > > individual results, while also allowing anyone to quickly see an
> > > overview of results on the Dashboard. The system provides
> > > maintainers with positive confirmation of the stability and
> > > performance of the overall project.
> > >
> > > In the future, we plan to open the Lab to more testing scenarios,
> > > such as performance testing of other features, beyond single-core
> > > packet I/O layer 2 throughput, and possibly running Unit Tests for DPDK.
> > > Additional features will be added to the Dashboard, such as showing
> > > graphs of the performance changes of master over time.
> > >
> > > If your company would like to be involved, email the Continuous
> > > Integration group at ci@dpdk.org and dpdklab@iol.unh.edu.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 10:03 AM Jeremy Plsek <jplsek@iol.unh.edu>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I can try to get it done later today, but I expect it to be more
> > likely done on Monday.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018, 9:08 AM O'Driscoll, Tim
> > <tim.odriscoll@intel.com wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > >> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > > >> > Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 2:02 PM
> > > >> > To: O'Driscoll, Tim <tim.odriscoll@intel.com>
> > > >> > Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Jeremy Plsek
> > > >> > <jplsek@iol.unh.edu>; ci@dpdk.org; marketing@dpdk.org
> > > >> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-marketing] [dpdk-ci] Results are now public
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 09/11/2018 14:58, O'Driscoll, Tim:
> > > >> > > From: Thomas Monjalon
> > > >> > > > 08/11/2018 14:01, Ferruh Yigit:
> > > >> > > > > On 11/7/2018 7:30 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > 06/11/2018 16:33, Jeremy Plsek:
> > > >> > > > > >> Hi all,
> > > >> > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > >> This is just an update that all detailed results are
> > > >> > > > > >> now
> > > >> > public.
> > > >> > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > >> If there is anything out of place, feel free to let me
> > know!
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > It is really nice!
> > > >> > > > > > Thank you
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Should we announce this in 'announce' or 'dev' mail lists?
> > Many
> > > >> > people
> > > >> > > > not aware
> > > >> > > > > of this.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > It deserves an announce.
> > > >> > > > And even a blog post I guess.
> > > >> > > > +Cc marketing team
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Agreed. I can do a quick post to announce@dpdk.org. I believe
> > Jeremy
> > > >> > is working on a blog post which can provide more detail.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Should we wait to have a blog post and reference it in the
> > announce?
> > > >>
> > > >> Good question. I think it depends how long the blog will take. If
> > we can do it fairly quickly, then this is a good idea. If it's going
> > to take a few weeks, then we should announce it now.
> > > >>
> > > >> Jeremy: When do you think the blog will be ready?
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jeremy Plsek
> > > UNH InterOperability Laboratory
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-06 15:33 [dpdk-ci] " Jeremy Plsek
2018-11-07  7:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-08 13:01   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-11-08 13:10     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-08 13:16       ` [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-marketing] " Trishan de Lanerolle
2018-11-08 13:37         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-08 15:57         ` Jeremy Plsek
2018-11-09 13:58       ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2018-11-09 14:01         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-09 14:07           ` Trishan de Lanerolle
2018-11-09 14:08           ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2018-11-09 15:03             ` Jeremy Plsek
2018-11-14 21:07               ` Jeremy Plsek
2018-11-14 22:16                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-15 22:13                   ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2018-11-15 22:30                     ` Jill Lovato
2018-11-16  2:29                     ` Tu, Lijuan [this message]
2018-11-16  2:48                       ` Lincoln Lavoie
2018-11-16 16:42                         ` Jill Lovato
2018-11-19 15:08                           ` Mara Bernazzani
2018-11-19 17:48                             ` Jill Lovato
2018-11-19 17:52                               ` Lincoln Lavoie
2018-11-19 17:55                                 ` Jill Lovato
2018-11-20  9:40                                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-20 13:58                                   ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2018-11-20 15:35                                     ` Jeremy Plsek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8CE3E05A3F976642AAB0F4675D0AD20E0B9BD2BC@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=lijuan.tu@intel.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jplsek@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=marketing@dpdk.org \
    --cc=pmacarth@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=tim.odriscoll@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK CI discussions

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci/0 ci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ci ci/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci \
		ci@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index ci


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.ci


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox