From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9924F43864; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:12:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935DB406B4; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:12:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950A940263; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:10:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186C8C15; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 04:11:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.50.86] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C53703F64C; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 04:10:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8dc41944-3ee6-48d0-b1e6-ff086e97aa12@arm.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 12:10:18 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: DTS testpmd and SCAPY integration Content-Language: en-GB To: "Etelson, Gregory" , Thomas Monjalon , =?UTF-8?Q?Juraj_Linke=C5=A1?= , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Paul Szczepanek , Yoan Picchi , Jeremy Spewock , Patrick Robb , "ci@dpdk.org" , dev@dpdk.org References: <2a287ee7-cda4-f2ab-a4e6-a47021f8573f@nvidia.com> From: Luca Vizzarro In-Reply-To: <2a287ee7-cda4-f2ab-a4e6-a47021f8573f@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 13:12:37 +0100 X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Hi Gregory, Your proposal sounds rather interesting. Certainly enabling DTS to accept YAML-written tests sounds more developer-friendly and should enable quicker test-writing. As this is an extra feature though – and a nice-to-have, it should definitely be discussed in the DTS meetings as Honnappa suggested already. Another thing, I am not sure that the intention is that Scapy will be the only traffic generator supported. Could be very wrong here. In the case we'd support others too, how would you tackle this problem? We can discuss this in the meeting as well if needed. Best, Luca