DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Zhaoyan" <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
To: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"dpdklab@iol.unh.edu" <dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>,
	Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>, "Tu, Lijuan" <lijuan.tu@intel.com>,
	"Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>,
	"Ma, LihongX" <lihongx.ma@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, XuemingX" <xuemingx.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Chen, Zhaoyan" <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re:  Intel performance test is failing
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 01:58:14 +0000
Message-ID: <9DEEADBC57E43F4DA73B571777FECECA41F03B43@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOeXdvbUinBw0Gep4hzTPBTjMkeQMbk6EJY1ktp++Kcru815ZQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6792 bytes --]

Hi, Brandon,

For 10G, please enable it. our code is at original path /opt/test-harness/dts.

For 40G, please keep running. and see if any issue. But, anyway, we have modified the DTS code at /opt/test-harness/dts-new-suite. If we met same problem, then use this new DTS instead.

Thanks a lot

Regards,
Zhaoyan Chen

From: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2020 1:49 AM
To: Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; ci@dpdk.org; Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu@intel.com>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu@intel.com>; Ma, LihongX <lihongx.ma@intel.com>; Zhang, XuemingX <xuemingx.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel performance test is failing

Hi Zhaoyan,

Currently, the 40G machine is stable enough to be put on production dashboard to run tests which may cause Trex to be killed.
Should I disable the 40G Intel machine for you to make changes?

Also, just for confirmation: on the 10G machine, is the folder that you are using for the testing located in /opt/test-harness/dts-2020-3-4, or are you still using the one in the standard /opt/test-harness/dts folder?

If everything is ok, I will enable the 10G machine for production testing.

Thank you very much

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 9:36 PM Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com<mailto:zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>> wrote:
Brandon,

We worked out a workaround on Intel testbeds. NNT(10G) and FVL(40G). Could you please help to recover them?

But, for FVL(40G) testbed,  we met some problems, could you please help to check before recover it

  *   Sometime 1G hugepage will be changed to 2Mhugepage automatically...we have to restart the system
  *   When we debugging on the testbed, found that Trex was killed by some one(app)..
Please help to check if any other program running on the testbed.

Thanks a lot.



Regards,
Zhaoyan Chen

From: Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com<mailto:zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 9:04 PM
To: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu>>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com<mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com>>; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu<mailto:dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net<mailto:thomas@monjalon.net>>; ci@dpdk.org<mailto:ci@dpdk.org>; Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu@intel.com<mailto:lijuan.tu@intel.com>>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu@intel.com<mailto:qian.q.xu@intel.com>>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com<mailto:zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel performance test is failing

Brandon, we almost made a workaround.

Maybe tomorrow, you could recover Intel’s testbed. I will let you know soon.



Regards,
Zhaoyan Chen

From: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 3:34 AM
To: Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com<mailto:zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com<mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com>>; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu<mailto:dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net<mailto:thomas@monjalon.net>>; ci@dpdk.org<mailto:ci@dpdk.org>; Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu@intel.com<mailto:lijuan.tu@intel.com>>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu@intel.com<mailto:qian.q.xu@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel performance test is failing

Hi Zhaoyan,

Have you finished making changes on the Intel machine?
I will turn on the machine on March 3rd for testing if you do not have any issues with it.
Please let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:13 PM Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com<mailto:zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi, Brandon,

Yes, it’s a wired issue. And it also mixed our DTS upgrading and Trex upgrading.
So we are reviewing our DTS script, different Trex version, and CI calling procedure.

Anyway, we are focusing on this task recently, any update will let you know.

Thanks.

Regards,
Zhaoyan Chen

From: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 10:46 PM
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com<mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com>>
Cc: Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com<mailto:zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>>; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu<mailto:dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net<mailto:thomas@monjalon.net>>; ci@dpdk.org<mailto:ci@dpdk.org>; Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu@intel.com<mailto:lijuan.tu@intel.com>>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu@intel.com<mailto:qian.q.xu@intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel performance test is failing

Hi Zhaoyan,

How is the current status of the Intel 82599ES?
Were there any configuration changes made to fix performance issues?

Thanks

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu>> wrote:
Hi David,

This was just a weird issue with the packet generator not cleaning itself after a test fast enough before another test.
I'll rerun the tests that were affected and keep an eye out to see if it's stable enough to be put back online.

Thanks

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 5:33 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com<mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 3:14 PM Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu>> wrote:
>
> Hi David and Zhaoyan,
>
>
> Yes, those results are related to the Intel machine; I have disabled testing for the Intel testbed.
>
> The 82599ES machine is now available for ssh and modifications.

Any news about this?

I received a failure on a patch of mine (changing macros in a ARM header).
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9900/

But this time, it is with the 40G Intel nic test.

--
David Marchand


--

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo@iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu>

www.iol.unh.edu<http://www.iol.unh.edu/>


--

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo@iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu>

www.iol.unh.edu<http://www.iol.unh.edu/>


--

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo@iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu>

www.iol.unh.edu<http://www.iol.unh.edu/>


--

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo@iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu>

www.iol.unh.edu<http://www.iol.unh.edu/>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 33765 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-23  1:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-23 15:58 [dpdk-ci] " Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-23 16:25 ` Jeremy Plsek
2020-01-23 20:28   ` Lincoln Lavoie
2020-01-31  3:17     ` Chen, Zhaoyan
2020-01-31 14:48       ` Jeremy Plsek
2020-02-03  3:57         ` Chen, Zhaoyan
2020-03-03  9:21           ` David Marchand
2020-03-03 14:13             ` [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] " Brandon Lo
2020-03-10  9:32               ` David Marchand
2020-03-10 13:11                 ` Brandon Lo
2020-03-10 14:46                   ` Brandon Lo
2020-03-11  2:13                     ` Chen, Zhaoyan
2020-03-17 19:34                       ` Brandon Lo
2020-03-18 13:04                         ` Chen, Zhaoyan
2020-03-20  1:35                           ` Chen, Zhaoyan
2020-03-20 17:48                             ` Brandon Lo
2020-03-23  1:58                               ` Chen, Zhaoyan [this message]
2020-03-24 13:30                                 ` Brandon Lo
2020-03-25  4:59                                   ` Chen, Zhaoyan
2020-03-26 15:39                                     ` Brandon Lo
2020-03-30  4:43                                       ` Chen, Zhaoyan
2020-03-31 13:42                                         ` Brandon Lo
2020-04-01  6:00                                           ` Ma, LihongX
2020-04-02 18:39                                             ` Brandon Lo
2020-04-03  1:14                                               ` Ma, LihongX
2020-04-15  9:39                                               ` Ma, LihongX
2020-04-15 19:30                                                 ` Brandon Lo
2020-04-16  3:40                                                   ` Ma, LihongX
2020-04-16 15:04                                                     ` Brandon Lo
2020-04-17  1:54                                                       ` Ma, LihongX
2020-04-17  7:00                                                       ` Ma, LihongX
2020-04-17 15:52                                                         ` Brandon Lo
2020-04-18  1:13                                                           ` Ma, LihongX
2020-04-28  3:39                                               ` Ma, LihongX
2020-04-28 16:51                                                 ` Brandon Lo
2020-04-29  5:30                                                   ` Ma, LihongX
2020-04-30 14:19                                                     ` Brandon Lo
2020-05-06 13:05                                                       ` Brandon Lo
2020-05-08  8:02                                                         ` Ma, LihongX
2020-05-12  5:41                                                         ` Ma, LihongX
2020-05-14 16:12                                                           ` Brandon Lo
2020-05-15  1:30                                                             ` Ma, LihongX

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9DEEADBC57E43F4DA73B571777FECECA41F03B43@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=zhaoyan.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=blo@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dpdklab@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=lihongx.ma@intel.com \
    --cc=lijuan.tu@intel.com \
    --cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=qian.q.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=xuemingx.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK CI discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci/0 ci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ci ci/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci \
		ci@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index ci

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.ci


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git