Hi All,

I can rerun this patch for you, and look into why the original run failed.

Regards,
Adam Hassick

From: Aaron Conole
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2022 11:22 AM
To: Kundapura, Ganapati
Cc: Adam Hassick; dpdk-test-reports@iol.unh.edu; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; test-report@dpdk.org; Jayatheerthan, Jay; jerinj@marvell.com; ci@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: |WARNING| pw113233-113239 [PATCH] [v7, 7/7] doc/eth_tx: update instance get API

Greeting Ganapati,

"Kundapura, Ganapati" <ganapati.kundapura@intel.com> writes:

> Hi Brandon,

Brandon left the lab in April.  I've CC'd Adam Hassick, who I think can

probably help.

>     This patch is reporting apply warnings

>

>   https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/22745/

>

> 

>

> Test-Label: iol-testing

>

> Test-Status: WARNING

>

> http://dpdk.org/patch/113233

>

> 

>

> _apply patch failure_

Looks like there was a race with updating vs. submitting.

Agree - this should be rerun.

> Submitter: Ganapati Kundapura <ganapati.kundapura at intel.com>

>

> Date: Wednesday, June 22 2022 10:37:56

>

> Applied on: CommitID:9aa95b6fc4d0f166f8364f60c476f52dfcbe1082

>

> Apply patch set 113233-113239 failed:

>

> But it seems that it’s trying to apply on the wrong commit

>

> Applied on dpdk (9aa95b6fc4d0f166f8364f60c476f52dfcbe1082)

>

> 

>

> I’m able to apply it on the latest commits of dpdk and dpdk-next-eventdev.

>

Thanks for confirming that at least this can apply and execute on

3227bc7138f5afd7593c0eb4dd6b52710f4193b7 ("crypto/qat: use intel-ipsec-mb for partial hash and AES")

> Most probably the next-eventdev tree is off sync in the lab, can you please check it?

>

> And after the issue is resolved, can you please re-trigger the test for mentioned patch?

I think this should be doable.

> Thanks,

>

> Ganapati