From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339ECA034C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:25:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA5240A87; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:25:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f175.google.com (mail-qk1-f175.google.com [209.85.222.175]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0FC40A87 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:25:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f175.google.com with SMTP id n197so12783177qke.1 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:25:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:date:from:subject:thread-topic:in-reply-to:message-id :references:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=piKcuFTrqX0e3AxpJ4KG0hiM3NkVl9d3HrCBGdwGpks=; b=Ywatw02i+myw1M15gZFwCkaH2myZf9Sf3obV637e/b7hK3UT1J0UtAlMhdGnOA6rfi PNRgnMQoCrXN1YtyuWaZIFeIMXao1xNX/qbK7+CvfIuU451rQR1Vbe2lUJ+78oBwZ7Em 4ned+qsYzF/IHwY8sUK0sTz79WTokz2zYObl0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:from:subject:thread-topic :in-reply-to:message-id:references:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=piKcuFTrqX0e3AxpJ4KG0hiM3NkVl9d3HrCBGdwGpks=; b=wxdwqFp0v8EamsbfkKSQuWxtJkjPLS0gs2SCBxRyvZKkEFWczEns2PZ8+acKSNcWxh Y7i07d5JYS1oL1gAlz/o6fBN7WpcRspMsaxENX1SNI/xkhWnTYjXKBR80vwTGYALbrit KUTrZAXWMc0CiXYrtt5rNy/fF6B0Ik/sIp0hzRogsYQOmJiyYZTAVjuWemfNhVJSeT6a cTl4PfdXtqiaDGEYqcgvLCnQjK2zgWyYaixGwvx98OyM/+q+K54wsVmTYraYfDKnRjJx 6vsHEl/4saHpj3N9zdb7480TWKYW2QkWb89gS0UufZTT3xu2uraXG7DS2eGbrVRPbw1r hBqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9uU09loHAgbEIANrzQiG421WMwuUXa2P5Rw/fHRF+emqZ1YioS vC/h0ySLGs9GI7u7S/YJJ0QYzA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1t+O2GJgZKa+COqNlI8I2jeRv8gdXODaJNxadRdI/bHfDIeAlj8BOZXwd48NsW3ZStdaFZiLg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2b9b:b0:6ab:bbde:1241 with SMTP id dz27-20020a05620a2b9b00b006abbbde1241mr2725546qkb.398.1655911516649; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SaucyComputer (c-75-69-143-20.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [75.69.143.20]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d14-20020a05620a240e00b006a6b6638a59sm17923064qkn.53.2022.06.22.08.25.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:25:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:25:14 -0400 From: "Hassick, Adam C" Subject: RE: |WARNING| pw113233-113239 [PATCH] [v7, 7/7] doc/eth_tx: update instance get API Thread-Topic: RE: |WARNING| pw113233-113239 [PATCH] [v7, 7/7] doc/eth_tx: update instance get API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: , To: Aaron Conole , "Kundapura, Ganapati" Cc: "dpdk-test-reports@iol.unh.edu" , "dpdklab@iol.unh.edu" , "test-report@dpdk.org" , "Jayatheerthan, Jay" , "jerinj@marvell.com" , "ci@dpdk.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org

Hi Al= l,

I can rerun this patch for you, and look into why the original ru= n failed.

Regards,
Adam Hassick

&nbs= p;

 

F= rom: Aaron Conole
Sent:= Wednesday, June 22, 2022 11:22 AM
To: Kundapura, Ganapati
Cc: Adam Hassick; dpdk-test-reports@iol.unh.edu; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; test-report@dpdk.org; Jayatheerthan, Jay; jerin= j@marvell.com; ci@dpdk.org
Sub= ject: Re: |WARNING| pw113233-113239 [PATCH] [v7, 7/7] doc/eth_tx: updat= e instance get API

 

Greeting Ganapati,

 

"Kundapura, Ganapati" <ganapati.kund= apura@intel.com> writes:

 

> Hi Brandon,

 

Brandon left the lab in April.=C2=A0 I've CC'd A= dam Hassick, who I think can

probably help.

 

>=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0 This patch is reporting apply warnings

> 

>=C2=A0=C2=A0 https://lab= .dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/22745/

> 

>=C2=A0

> 

> Test-Label: iol-testing=

> 

>= Test-Status: WARNING

> 

> http://dpdk.org/patch/113233

= > 

>=C2=A0

> 

> _apply patch fail= ure_

 

Look= s like there was a race with updating vs. submitting.

 

Agree - this should be rerun.<= /p>

 

> Subm= itter: Ganapati Kundapura <ganapati.kundapura at intel.com>

> 

> Date: Wed= nesday, June 22 2022 10:37:56

> 

> Applied on: CommitID:9aa95b6fc4d0f166f8364f6= 0c476f52dfcbe1082

> 

> Apply patch set 113233-113239 failed:

> 

> But it seems that i= t=E2=80=99s trying to apply on the wrong commit

&g= t; 

> Applied on dpdk (9aa95b6fc= 4d0f166f8364f60c476f52dfcbe1082)

> 

>=C2=A0

>&n= bsp;

> I=E2=80=99m able to apply it on the= latest commits of dpdk and dpdk-next-eventdev.

>= ; 

 

Thanks for confirming that at least this can apply and execute on=

3227bc7138f5afd7593c0eb4dd6b52710f4193b7 ("cr= ypto/qat: use intel-ipsec-mb for partial hash and AES")

 

> Most probably the = next-eventdev tree is off sync in the lab, can you please check it?

> 

> And aft= er the issue is resolved, can you please re-trigger the test for mentioned = patch?

 

I = think this should be doable.

 

<= p class=3DMsoNormal>> Thanks,

> 

> Ganapati

&nbs= p;

 

=