From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1219AA0350 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:59:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F297E1BDFD; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:59:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1C61B6B4 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:59:55 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: ssIB7isSwV97P0VKoOmidXm/lImNmH0tVqQnJWdUwLeq/kLbe9O18y32dt8aEgwbWlShKrdp/7 mqrjgiuQQYqg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9666"; a="134453386" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,296,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="134453386" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jun 2020 22:59:53 -0700 IronPort-SDR: obHQgWYOgDcrsX8kwii0KL5QW+TvVB6DHh4cg/WvthMhja9VF40SxZyVkEhu1j9I1u3aU7Fsof m0US2xefmCmQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,296,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="454478292" Received: from orsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.131]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Jun 2020 22:59:53 -0700 Received: from ORSEDG001.ED.cps.intel.com (10.7.248.4) by ORSMSX104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:59:53 -0700 Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.58.108) by edgegateway.intel.com (134.134.137.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:59:53 -0700 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=LLaz5jSgAyTKsgEw1UxEuh1Fs8lkyh9xRHyvD/eqYidEMyz3d8pDCJfGx6q/d52zc8kr76vwql4dCqR2XT7noHUGD6hsuyvieZpjYCD9WKGYXGPgFR2X1EXInEY6j00Sh9ZTsG0mSdfthr9/Akbni0xaEgIhetJ8T0MauxYwKvlpuuPGV6koipNVplH+yE1GvvVu01zAT6oqO+ateSTl34KBRXc25hv/IFsDz1gLGUQPEBxNbyAwHVFObZsezN3PzSi/fvK/fvJIakKD8QviJGKx60GncpnqaFmipk2VtAgIadNzm+vHWc8cz6NpbHAXsGaFoK4H8DSQM0+Va4wrLA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=bBge+dAJyzAwg6dPbjXvIJz5TQUqtRFIlEJU4EXKtnU=; b=EBe3j2IdMwqHzl8IpGI1cMgog2TkoYE/zTUNkMCGrAEmmtsudAsveyH7R+qhEfnk1Ro1Uhf+piXrk2EJCsLxWbM5EtBrD8I8JWy7hr7wNGQszxXLMV5OOBYm7WmfbMY5tIkNZCFli+KwnFLLZFyN8fCdNZJ09bQB27GcyvJxqXIQRufsUZy3DabRKd3ANMCHRew8xBI8T1JGCgQDOaduni31vL9B+MYNN2z6HPPtdLJUGGL16PBa9euvA2WNL2SQHVz3fnYj+5FSI7l/fzEyBf7qMyxJaKwU09sXDInfzMdXExIzbR+BaoOhAujqxkYi5kwf5JSpK73A23cK1NidKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=intel.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-intel-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=bBge+dAJyzAwg6dPbjXvIJz5TQUqtRFIlEJU4EXKtnU=; b=CuCq73rDx/gy5/ReRWe4cDRIId7TmMOM2UJ5zrtOyk+70h2klYDThbi4GfjIJU6h2pInN2bqEF5I8L1HZ/WwvSGoXRBCdpTseKtcqbUJY/RYX5mBYfxQcRZnNe/gC4W4y4FsMMLXVebcZfqwPZBoX8b/n08ns/W7CNdunIjgBck= Received: from BYAPR11MB3317.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:7b::22) by BYAPR11MB3495.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:8a::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.24; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 05:59:51 +0000 Received: from BYAPR11MB3317.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f02a:4acd:fc9a:17e1]) by BYAPR11MB3317.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f02a:4acd:fc9a:17e1%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3131.027; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 05:59:51 +0000 From: "Chen, Zhaoyan" To: Thomas Monjalon , David Marchand , "ci@dpdk.org" CC: sys_stv , "Chen, Zhaoyan" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-ci] Failures reported by Intel CI for series 10551 Thread-Index: AQHWSS0KzrFBaR+GkE+rORm/OWmr5qjqN4dwgABRLACAACzBgIAF/xag Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 05:59:51 +0000 Message-ID: References: <6471530.9lzsYzkM2H@thomas> In-Reply-To: <6471530.9lzsYzkM2H@thomas> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-product: dlpe-windows authentication-results: monjalon.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;monjalon.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=intel.com; x-originating-ip: [192.102.204.45] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5988ae0c-f7de-4c09-b6a4-08d81cbacdcf x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3495: x-ld-processed: 46c98d88-e344-4ed4-8496-4ed7712e255d,ExtAddr x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7691; x-forefront-prvs: 0450A714CB x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 0IXuqWWsThJvMRa2f7qTAZY/zhC2yIUgyWEhhlReqf+feRdyvZ4vkeJmgL1olv+4Uo5gVXgwAS6dWg2M8kIiD7S+7IweI+eDerUVTyZxf6oWrdIFoLERFppMiSOTkkeAeZkROiAttTdEByzWTvzzt8EljE4Y1rixv8RZScllahH6A+vF1UUfuRztDsXYUeFvhNKUxJuawzrdpr0W5UHIs5oE/wQ9eEHSQKhVJcu1peaVMrdXEnel6w9BvQynttRsbYVfY3zWpAX1pdKcOVi86sWXLf0lH4Hd8sW3gB4ZQiY3raJrAj/pv1rmDP0eWTRoKBudH1uK1C2+MMG8iQGofQ== x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR11MB3317.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(366004)(346002)(376002)(110136005)(478600001)(9686003)(186003)(8936002)(26005)(53546011)(6506007)(71200400001)(55016002)(5660300002)(83380400001)(52536014)(66946007)(76116006)(66446008)(64756008)(66476007)(66556008)(107886003)(86362001)(316002)(8676002)(33656002)(54906003)(4326008)(7696005)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR11MB3317.namprd11.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5988ae0c-f7de-4c09-b6a4-08d81cbacdcf X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Jun 2020 05:59:51.4552 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 46c98d88-e344-4ed4-8496-4ed7712e255d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: LCuWujIWONRC2lmQOLl3dECDISMgq7j1b0w9eMu4chZSXl545PW6BWQoJGgbrF6dbnPFrNwPtBq7Ynlmf/pxtQ== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3495 X-OriginatorOrg: intel.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Failures reported by Intel CI for series 10551 X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Hi all, I have updated the info for this issue in bugzilla. We have re-built the patchset. It was passed. The root cause is that patche= s in the series are disorder by patchid. (patch 7/9 and patch 8/9). Usuall= y, we apply patches by the order of patch id in a series.=20 Why the issue is exposed this time? Meet 2 conditions, - the patches are disorder in the series - the disordered patches are modified same file Solution - Change applying patch order by patch date, rather than patch id in patchw= ork. But we don't know if patch date is unique and ordered for each patch in the= series.=20 We need patchwork document to confirm. So far, its good. For Thomas' suggestion, "sending the series report only on the last patch o= f the series", currently, I find all reports iol-* are sent to the first pa= tch in the series. Shall we align? and shall we get feedback from all maint= ainers or developers in the community? Regards, Zhaoyan Chen > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 6:24 PM > To: Chen, Zhaoyan > Cc: ci@dpdk.org; sys_stv ; David Marchand > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Failures reported by Intel CI for series 10551 >=20 > 26/06/2020 09:43, David Marchand: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 5:03 AM Chen, Zhaoyan > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, David, > > > > > > For your question, "Is it normal to see all patches with the exact sa= me > test report?" > > > Yes, we always test a series, rather than a single patch. You can > > > see the exact same report on any patch in a series. (it's > > > convenient, you don't need backward to search the header of the > > > series, then check result) > > > > Convenience is subject to interpretation :-). > > Other CI systems send a single report which is more sane for me. >=20 > I think these tests have 2 purposes: > - sending quick error feedback to the author > - check that all is green before merging In both cases we don't > need to have the same report duplicated, because we check for failures in > all patches anyway. >=20 > I suggest sending the series report only on the last patch of the series. >=20