From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF7AA00E6 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:33:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866663257; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:33:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ot1-f67.google.com (mail-ot1-f67.google.com [209.85.210.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499152C6D for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:33:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ot1-f67.google.com with SMTP id u15so4847464otq.10 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:33:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zy4njQafm+/M1gfF+0CNU6ukothMO7o7Tvfjjq0pb+g=; b=Uwvgdh1HqNUM3X/LHKtxGjV+aDo9LgCEZL3IXbxLMzKluhVXmZd3tuIl/XokcSJn+z OMIVhy2gQVGBNaj1jYowGwdSjAN9jufuse6LC7IOrVYfXe7fzOHZUU0/T24jlrsfqQ8Y Z50h0dFeBDXLVCpD0jHaakzO5oC6x0pXKt2gQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zy4njQafm+/M1gfF+0CNU6ukothMO7o7Tvfjjq0pb+g=; b=Ohk5qdeba3b7q5JuiJfZgvxJ5utlqZYC5nWhWPnHHNFviA6Vm6FTtF7TZDP0v0uc6u eC3ycWjkP0MBLL2q9A+CVEDjjhbgnSBq0tvO19AciBompq4mujpxDDhz0vKz+3yAc5oC 5Yh/7LRqh8RX74EPIEFqxZRb783GcQjRckcQ+UqSg12YXVqK3VNnO3L/9icNOzMPCGHU PjyPKx4uLmhhXsjsdInB1GUUDpVKa50a8sYqGSuLW1C+gOiw0/VWsGIt2pvqWxJD3BvQ WbgvAmzAxr1veeIn38tQdbGEbpojQrvcydGQVpcNNgj5yQwqpLHTZe8S5cNySf649FfO Whcg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX3cn8X3+mV0w41Ua+yRTLqtePZc4pb6MY/PZ3ktTLG8hfuNFBG m3gR8Vgz2xaZWVMqs8cz58YZrLrCuT55kndwM81DCA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwp8Ul7mdMo986KZwBRWugcHEitVHvvzC76Oy5y5Qo0tnCxBxQxC/JVqYepZ76RdHXgZ7OBmWZbc+mFNDt3zTA= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5784:: with SMTP id q4mr3044008oth.277.1555695225487; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:33:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190216160206.11957-1-alialnu@mellanox.com> <2149176.42v1TqmSes@xps> In-Reply-To: <2149176.42v1TqmSes@xps> From: Jeremy Plsek Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:33:09 -0400 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Ali Alnubani , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , "ci@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v4] add script to decide best tree match for patches X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" I thinks so. Only more patchsets will tell, but that could be improved after the fact. So I think it's fine to merge it in. At first glance, the only part that I don't think is implemented is mentioned here: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166#c35 > We must match the common prefix of the git trees. > Examples: > dpdk-next-net-intel + dpdk = dpdk > dpdk-next-net-intel + dpdk-next-net-mlx = dpdk-next-net Since some of the patches are being set to dpdk-next-net-mlx instead of dpdk-next-net. But I'm fine with how it is right now and wouldn't mind it getting changed to this later on. On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:24 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 19/04/2019 18:21, Jeremy Plsek: > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 4:16 AM Ali Alnubani wrote: > > > Did you guys get a chance to test this version? > > > > We've switched to using it a few days ago. > > Some examples of it switching branches: > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/5503/ > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/5499/ > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/5498/ > > Is it working as you expect? > May I merge it in dpdk-ci? > > -- Jeremy Plsek UNH InterOperability Laboratory