From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC54DA053A for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 17:25:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E48B2956; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 17:25:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-lj1-f170.google.com (mail-lj1-f170.google.com [209.85.208.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739953B5 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 17:25:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-lj1-f170.google.com with SMTP id j1so4198736lja.2 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 08:25:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Y535+3G5MsJhTYBgKv90e4C2o7p+RO47jebCorvqXu4=; b=gDdTisxSqL2En1rZAlf18K8H7ws8AM/8Ckr37IE+EyxwqcEUYTeWAgWpoEpXMOPsD0 a4KJlEMJNlrHI3twaLoowj/diXu9BJPT7AOWV7C1fyvnfXRvCWwhfsFR2bWxBJQhXjtA dCvh/1xbIV2sY+1HOXXVZteNlQSJdOIXZ1yBw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Y535+3G5MsJhTYBgKv90e4C2o7p+RO47jebCorvqXu4=; b=bZRe/Gi29UwZR3m3SOFMFh/sKv9wPD7T5dzKDDjpmjnVHkUKv5m3yiKwnW8Zr/qLh/ zn3y9NVRqqZji5cocfBGTNUVErzBbsa0I2Tz8sCl9UmnR7tLWd/1PksQgtxR7mfE7u+m hRtm7cTpLX/N0onGp6VhMHO2EXI+hR8+6SBhhvmSLr6447+QXeg9Qo/MVWFHxD/cm5km WIx+Jy5Po+M70iLeng8YMWP664bSoF9noaAhWvgLkdJA1HE4ma/PU+ibSca5WnqMUwCA KIzAwMg1Zp/HLMOPyI4izpHn0II0VeUTSDNwpCmWZLPiZs8LpNllHw3UVuIa9qRI8K/E 4RfA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUG3dxFR2yigpxfgNaSsIL5HkxDUT4b/FD28AWfHui5InPOU5PR y1aWBVMaUGZxJsjPS9N+n4RCmelR2fue56CScIKlAA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxeUR24n3bp3836VGkvYFgtd77mpwSv+/gnMSQoVNT5ot9K+8OpI6Nv3S9SW9Kpk4K9WaO4EnA404oSwG+AqGs= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b5d5:: with SMTP id g21mr24110661ljn.89.1579796738001; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 08:25:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1827408.xz2uEaWSZ7@xps> In-Reply-To: <1827408.xz2uEaWSZ7@xps> From: Jeremy Plsek Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:25:01 -0500 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: ci@dpdk.org, "Tu, Lijuan" , "Chen, Zhaoyan" , "Xu, Qian Q" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel performance test is failing X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:06 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Hi, > > The test iol-intel-Performance is failing on all patches > for a couple of days. > It seems to be due to a perf drop with a 10G device > > Can we disable this test until we understand what happens? > > We need also to understand how to avoid such failure, > and how to monitor and disable it faster. > > Thanks > > Hi Thomas, I've disabled it for now until someone from the Intel team can look into it (cc'd). I've also seem problems where the results are completely off (-15mpps), and I've been rerunning those when they happen. I'm hoping those can be resolved too. -- Jeremy Plsek UNH InterOperability Laboratory