Re: [dpdk-ci] [EXTERNAL] Re: Help with a rerun of failed ci/iol-intel-functional

[David Liu <dliu@iol.unh.edu>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3431 bytes --]

Hi,

The rerun has been kick off.

The test result on the patchwork will be updated shortly.

Thank,
David

On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:26 PM Jie Zhou <jizh@microsoft.com> wrote:

> Thanks Aaron!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 5:47 AM
> To: Jie Zhou <jizh@microsoft.com>
> Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>; Owen Hilyard <
> ohilyard@iol.unh.edu>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dpdk-ci] Help with a rerun of failed
> ci/iol-intel-functional
>
> Jie Zhou <jizh@microsoft.com> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > This patchset
> > (https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpatc
> > hwork.dpdk.org%2Fproject%2Fdpdk%2Fpatch%2F1620241931-28435-11-git-send
> > -email-jizh%40linux.microsoft.com%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cjizh%40microso
> > ft.com%7C312abec10018483bdbea08d911565a50%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd0
> > 11db47%7C1%7C0%7C637559884846642838%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC
> > 4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sd
> > ata=FOtKE7%2BzuGhSR1uIZSCdvnKJ31oQgq1o6RE6U1KuGno%3D&amp;reserved=0)
> > hit CI lab test failure on ci/iol-intel-functional
> > (https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flab
> > .dpdk.org%2Fresults%2Fdashboard%2Fpatchsets%2F16955%2F&amp;data=04%7C0
> > 1%7Cjizh%40microsoft.com%7C312abec10018483bdbea08d911565a50%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637559884846652833%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=74kKnF9U1d%2Fy10TqMkDZE4kdiVCtZbWkWz4R7KJWS4Y%3D&amp;reserved=0).
> Per looking at the log, don't see how that is related to the change from
> this patchset (previous versions passed this test and this V13 just
> trivially resolve a header file 1 line patch apply conflict). Wondering if
> is it possible that you help with rerun this test for the patchset to see
> the failure is intermittent or not? Appreciate your help!
>
> I see errors like:
>
> ------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/supersocket.py", line
> 134, in __del__
>     self.close()
>   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.py", line
> 514, in close
>     set_promisc(self.ins, self.iface, 0)
>   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.py", line
> 165, in set_promisc
>     mreq = struct.pack("IHH8s", get_if_index(iff), PACKET_MR_PROMISC, 0,
> b"")
>   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.py", line
> 380, in get_if_index
>     return int(struct.unpack("I", get_if(iff, SIOCGIFINDEX)[16:20])[0])
>   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/common.py", line
> 59, in get_if
>     ifreq = ioctl(sck, cmd, struct.pack("16s16x", iff.encode("utf8")))
> OSError: [Errno 19] No such device
>
> ------------------------------------
>   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/pexpect/spawnbase.py", line
> 166, in read_nonblocking
>     s = os.read(self.child_fd, size)
> OSError: [Errno 5] Input/output error
>
> ------------------------------------
> Looks like it's something in the infrastructure or configuration of the
> HW.  CC'd the lab folks.
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > Jie
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5081 bytes --]