From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AACE45501; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:31:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677CF40281; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:31:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ot1-f48.google.com (mail-ot1-f48.google.com [209.85.210.48]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728C14021E for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:31:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ot1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-700d083b65bso752268a34.3 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:31:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1719430284; x=1720035084; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=o0Uupw7VaB38njjFb63iEmk69UIFMNm5bOdtIDjcFoA=; b=beUHOBoA1oGSqhrGRfecKbDMa0/b//FJbuJDIWM4isvpmQcOnT5qb00jHHpO+1VmWk 9jRqOpl6JHTDogSPpMD2SOHOp9nQDkZaI86dK8yK1RhzI3NwXr7FNEHRqSUu1PimVdIC 6oy/17iNMJdhesQuCIFX7MN5pak2l/msdHxaA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719430284; x=1720035084; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=o0Uupw7VaB38njjFb63iEmk69UIFMNm5bOdtIDjcFoA=; b=n8L2+mofzeHDsbOE0IiCgP0LnX//KuwuZcAMCLrKgch1VirdJKZLbyIU6BNP4tcD/p HZBIW9kHfLpaBAYI4D+MyR2NTY6GvNIZxVXk0PKLvRvPoDMnX6jk49dvhIHYUlxQ0slk +I4IlPtMK0OGupzhcs0MjAv1grljBLtS93Zqy8nOcjzndHagEQtTPZTQzzzz9Ywaw1xh +W2fvEMpOcO/8MXCxrrUXeNnrPzsumtPwxgpTyu4B/cO71NytPEdvK37Wwp3mhif6knR milA1o6DY1+ZDSQaopmByWtOc7S1BS1WB5vCcLqWlYmwr0mwqx8lKbnLlTzAXJYM42+P MPmw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUiAgcEQx9i7jtOhPboBYknkTO/ytI7iCyJdN0ZYcwW1l1bba1drperdFHWysKwhD+xFRdHQ1Ov1ilIBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzE3jyauH++Cf9d/v20XHqXdmWnCG5R9xGssy0ZJbN26W7Nt8iv yg68bhFLgT84Roj+pgWiTWX7FHbsukb7MvZCUUIwRBxcDzkvsJP3ey/8TSHAe2F7lE/pQeNssW9 SY+hFZVNphz4xW0FD1bVN/vALlaJxrn/CQQYl7g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHUlYxs9qFPfyIJiwsTyOG7ZC+lya4JWKdP4fWUnX9uF3+RnhjQJnxGBJA8ebt3+sfjkx+0OsSa8P0hfrTZ4bM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:16d6:b0:700:d5d5:a17f with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-700d5d5a820mr2227107a34.33.1719430284465; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:31:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240517192222.20555-2-probb@iol.unh.edu> <20240523215945.16468-1-probb@iol.unh.edu> In-Reply-To: From: Adam Hassick Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:31:54 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools: check for pending test status when parsing emails To: Patrick Robb Cc: Aaron Conole , ci@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, alialnu@nvidia.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Ali, I've been monitoring Patchwork today after rolling out the feature on just the ABI context, and I've noticed that checks with "pending" status do not appear in the table or in the Patchwork API. I only see the check appear in the table/API once the final "success" check is sent. Here's a thread that I've been tracking for example: http://inbox.dpdk.org/test-report/667c6064.050a0220.f0848.4472SMTPIN_ADDED_= MISSING@mx.google.com/T/#u It looks to me that the "Test-Status" tag is set correctly. Is it possible there are errors when adding the checks on the Patchwork end= ? Thanks, Adam On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 3:34=E2=80=AFPM Patrick Robb wr= ote: > > Thanks Aaron for merging and Ali for updating on the PW side. > > UNH is going to start reporting with the PENDING status today for just > the ABI patchwork context. If all looks good, we will enable for the > entire set of contexts we are responsible for tomorrow.