From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5818846B3D; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 22:11:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D96402C1; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 22:11:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-yw1-f174.google.com (mail-yw1-f174.google.com [209.85.128.174]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E2E4028B for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 22:11:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-yw1-f174.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-716ee8947cdso15672607b3.0 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 13:11:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1752178313; x=1752783113; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=sLNRlt5JC4mnWCZTGquu6jfh4BC/OB0ihr+z2o3y+cQ=; b=J1rakTmGmGrEVjowTQTtKKFjKXewjQGxV2ZAOKM69hx/F3jcxOJPHWvBK/yDBpGm21 jQ+4nlxbuU/6amhvdGzRdku0QmB80kWTPBPLd8Ow9xx4NQmI8ojAkCvQXoL8GqFjDdjl LdwQwOR9woMoBC2ia/v7XS/XakAsR/mfmtFrU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1752178313; x=1752783113; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sLNRlt5JC4mnWCZTGquu6jfh4BC/OB0ihr+z2o3y+cQ=; b=O0qVZtO124nm08PaAA0vpyUu0Ilk4ej5SvmXfeMuJogAEntronevtpuWFsOOyfYqIL s6quLI8gAU/0bxhHwl1VEWFgbM79Lv4rj6pScCqdrK3gN/dORvQuRoagVydWecDRjym2 XThz3MgzvAPKiX37LMenQ9wXYUaY/k5axjC/2pk/Z1vOT0v+faXjcsWmlOOwtq4I5yh3 LK9cjssHc+/xivAZyjm6QogsqQrCjYrFuAhySrtPgMBJsd7rg9gXZW8/vNAiikMTqFs1 fmktAv5vZyHtQn6rR+l/jStz4LMcHMBxcaDq2wdkMh9/ar35uUKETx5+nb03J7KbSoKZ txdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YywZ8DfSiDr5JCTcFjiGsrrX2CwTbewf6GjbcuFjcT9E9TqTBHx 1DrLi/c+ATIzYHdJM1JyBSbC75Dk8omp3LQDN1V3NTDDwRg9bZrWRkGd/1+25lItJxKWLWzNjXY p1+1PhpYGbHkMyP1wC90JsfOKGByURXV3BAo2DQjRRw== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctZx9LLUfg6wiLFRf6N0yf3HzqiY6Wuxk4uBf4rKVW0DpSr4+2gPJ9Ip8pqZXj i1Z9oh8OTEMSqIbY+zHanyZda703LM7gDgd8+4wEtOwcQs2dW4V9mu1rieZ/Fc08R2TNskt03aI 7M5g/wSd6NmE2CCR8bmAVZ6Sf5nxNjJfa82Cdf8fdI+1jwRGhx6hUgNuiT0HicAv9oco0TFeLZ+ vb29BHsseBsRkH4izssGBQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFtXxE0LHojY8NI4cL6JMni8oNtAdYTKBGl8cOsjWwN56xXTDOQyXJ9znFcTlEk1BB0bxGhZYzDRCZ5pGIj+z4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:f96:b0:716:59a6:2dc5 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-717d5bc92damr18039567b3.15.1752178312771; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 13:11:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Adam Hassick Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 16:11:41 -0400 X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXx9nszQfJ9NQTGmyj8OZwixr7lB2Xb-7Jxt_7wp6vO_CRJAv2Dy89GhS4o Message-ID: Subject: Re: Polling for patchseries in DPDK - the /series/ and /events/ endpoints To: Patrick Robb Cc: ci@dpdk.org, dev , Ali Alnubani , "Brandes, Shai" , zhoumin , "Puttaswamy, Rajesh T" , Aaron Conole Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Hi All, It appears that there already is a filter for projects for events, but the filter is configured to be hidden from the HTML view for some reason. We don't need to make any code changes to enable this feature. See here: https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/blob/stable/3.2/patchwo= rk/api/filters.py#L239 If you visit the following URL: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/events/?category=3Dseries-created&project=3D= CI You can filter for series created events by project. This query filters for series created events for the CI repo's project. Adam On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 12:07=E2=80=AFPM Patrick Robb w= rote: > > I went looking through recent series on patchwork and I think this is a g= ood example of the timestamp condition: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/seri= es/35145/. Looks like the original commits were made on April 18, then the = newest version was submitted on May 5 but the series record retains the 4/1= 8 date. > > And I see that there is no project filter provided by the /events/ endpoi= nt. https://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/events/ > > Adam, would you agree the project filter for API requests is pretty low h= anging fruit? Seems like a common sense improvement to me. > > On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 3:08=E2=80=AFPM Patrick Robb w= rote: >> >> Thanks for the clarification regarding the datetimes. Yes let's clear up= any remaining questions offline at Prague. :)