From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BD443CBB; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 16:19:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8D1402C7; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 16:19:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-yw1-f175.google.com (mail-yw1-f175.google.com [209.85.128.175]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89011402C3 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 16:19:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-yw1-f175.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6098b9ed2a3so21516797b3.0 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 08:19:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1710515956; x=1711120756; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AF6I7FUjsS0GDPmAxUMp8nkHjrukQqMGE/SV8XZ80B8=; b=WN6i1Ag8Fp9Rg+PC6WLjOwT7+thXTAOiiHi+VSUgHVkF9ZAv8NBnzsri3ZOkljAW5N bWhAYHs9LKnsMZpeQu5DwYZdMWpBdoU0U42mM0fxwmeQ88OdjlKqB/nk42Sz1OyOIEVI lHlMIbUd439HHWRG2YPYu4TyeZU2TY7B7Ohp0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710515956; x=1711120756; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AF6I7FUjsS0GDPmAxUMp8nkHjrukQqMGE/SV8XZ80B8=; b=mjFu4MzdhOArzlhdIEBSOPBm+VfqPU4T6CjLj1GKsFpiygCXiqXfqwbFwjBqFDGlhI I/cSRRIMRmTUGpAlPjrQqQhDtlVyOs7/N8L5ZUspLxSyOfX4Cl/CpAaAO3atbzyD+Sco NQIWvaES1lydeJs9AT4Ro53SLPJds/JGsEh6PturFWkZDmXDrmhMxAfmmKkM+H2LbqtO 0oGRa/iWD708sXLC9npYX/7mIfJ46Cf+pqtcSusVs5klamd18zBq7oN04EY3xRJRR3xQ 2JCGypY3+Fg/h4EJzruB05+D1LQwvouBZMD4yRmrJRu2zrUTrMi8EOt5WpIYB47Bsl4A COlg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwDrX9q3AbxifSgETFROBxV1YG5Y33zmpn3Fa1dG9PcwZNf2NfG 8fb4s1iO2R9W6vaxsHNZl2XnbYBMV+I58uqlXDTkupFhT88IxBtdK30UUi/H5r1IwS2wKbX6gGL sU8KyGrSPJqut1PWl6hDeXt26w3BuFEnVTHx/WA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGkvNMWc5S9XIC5XPgsY1U9tplWIpQ+7uqlZ0ZNx9X+rsya5PkLJsbtf12MsyIFFu6PyMsJMOXwy8XP8Ac3BRg= X-Received: by 2002:a25:6b08:0:b0:dd0:972d:921 with SMTP id g8-20020a256b08000000b00dd0972d0921mr4645705ybc.22.1710515955884; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 08:19:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Adam Hassick Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:19:05 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: OVS Testing in the Community Lab To: Aaron Conole Cc: ci@dpdk.org, Patrick Robb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Hi Aaron, I'm working on enabling OVS testing in the community lab. Currently, I have a compile test set up which follows the steps defined in the OVS documentation (https://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/intro/install/dpdk/) and consumes the shared libraries produced by the DPDK native GCC compile test that we run. This way, we can save some compute resources by not compiling DPDK an additional time. However, this will mean that the OVS compile test will not run if the DPDK compile test fails in any environment, but I think that behavior is acceptable. What do you think? The OVS compile test has passed successfully with DPDK main, which is promising. I'm unsure what the scope of our testing should be as well. Should we run the compile tests on all of our VM/container environments (to get good distro coverage), or just a few? And should we only run periodic testing on main or include LTS, next-* branches? Regards, Adam