From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Zhuobin Huang <zobin1999@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, cunming.liang@intel.com, ci@dpdk.org,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/test: fix data length of each packet segment
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:26:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8w5cwexWmjDv9iPxP-fsKMQSyM-k9HuOVebu5OEA1pBAQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230306065156.3759-1-zobin1999@gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 7:52 AM Zhuobin Huang <zobin1999@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Assign correct data length to each segments according
> to the given pkt_len and nb_pkt_segs, instead of
> using pkt_len as the data_len of every packet segment
>
> Fixes: a9c9e9698d5e ("app/test: allow to create packets of different sizes")
> Cc: cunming.liang@intel.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhuobin Huang <zobin1999@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Good catch.
I am curious to know how you noticed the issue since I see no in-tree
code asking for multiseg.
For the record, to check this patch, I compiled with
-DRTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEBUG and a small modification:
diff --git a/app/test/test_pmd_perf.c b/app/test/test_pmd_perf.c
index ff84d251ff..5c670ff165 100644
--- a/app/test/test_pmd_perf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_pmd_perf.c
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ init_traffic(struct rte_mempool *mp,
return generate_packet_burst(mp, pkts_burst, &pkt_eth_hdr,
0, &pkt_ipv4_hdr, 1,
&pkt_udp_hdr, burst_size,
- PACKET_BURST_GEN_PKT_LEN, 1);
+ PACKET_BURST_GEN_PKT_LEN, 2);
}
static int
Before the fix:
DPDK_TEST=pmd_perf_autotest ./build-gcc/app/test/dpdk-test --no-huge
-m 2048 --vdev=net_null0 --vdev=net_null1
...
Generate 4096 packets @socket 0
inject 2048 packet to port 0
PANIC in rte_mbuf_sanity_check():
bad pkt_len
Cc: ci@ in general, we should have more tests run with debug/check
options enabled.
--
David Marchand
parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-16 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20230306065156.3759-1-zobin1999@gmail.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8w5cwexWmjDv9iPxP-fsKMQSyM-k9HuOVebu5OEA1pBAQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=cunming.liang@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=zobin1999@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).