From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E29424FE; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 09:10:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145CB40A87; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 09:10:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2E74026A for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 09:10:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1693897833; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9vmizmadO0sGBYMkPX/UEBfhRMXnajg+gtJQeWui04E=; b=LP8x0SXNtm+UQTWVkk4VJXcrlPPWsW1cg5G8DfATw5tide40nYbJ/fRFkAs3Gs+tfy18m5 Rc0qKXqmKv5trBvE0QTJIb1rM3GblMIFTSRJjsBputbsL6sry8fbQNkifp/jNUt8Ly3SBU 3U7DUp3T4qmeyI2RF4wm3iAu0BVDcVo= Received: from mail-lf1-f70.google.com (mail-lf1-f70.google.com [209.85.167.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-117-eUd2FawyNriUhMo3NaeJ7w-1; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 03:10:31 -0400 X-MC-Unique: eUd2FawyNriUhMo3NaeJ7w-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50091545239so2310136e87.3 for ; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:10:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693897830; x=1694502630; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9vmizmadO0sGBYMkPX/UEBfhRMXnajg+gtJQeWui04E=; b=PZVhMFVz9YzLZQDao0rBkudT8B8i6Z7g7HjGniLpGnWb18CzdGXu2c6ApeBeZE1RsE eSYP/vtS7KNHaJVhpClM4bqBbz/qlHbZjasBnOYSvAkokKwaT46L83770WEjfHbe/e8P dR8YWplnZ4Nl5HTZLd1xGpxXHuI8qCnpgZBGNryzG39uvdbX2ktIEbswAPEW3+KplhgC VkJ/R9Sv/t+3AfwGQUYeM4oNuOzsfAO7BafdrBmBMzWH+6vAHbVUNCwxd7vsZ41Nbr1X Uzit5MT8r9K+Qf2u/A2TsYwY2SnKRP+aqEJVBMUFYU5ILG5H6RWNUxLTCk6ydnuCeIr6 ngKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwTyhEaWkX4XJXGvHOffpUHqgg2+P0SuvGXymoX1enayGDWBp6w jusp5/GbSXfVY3Wr5QJ+lPs9Wx4bXLsbLRZ1Us9c5el2mgYV0r3GWNGzI0ytGappyF8sbvgKtSH G9i7RPLCXrrvtH8vkTw== X-Received: by 2002:a19:645b:0:b0:4fe:82a7:814f with SMTP id b27-20020a19645b000000b004fe82a7814fmr6815898lfj.37.1693897830534; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:10:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE0WnXQpO4gfqN8NkZ2Y3XML7eIMX9XLTFyqsAqJCPfko1wPyF1zpi5ZwV8ZNVQZbPXHOOLRiAzxWqfwMmKW6A= X-Received: by 2002:a19:645b:0:b0:4fe:82a7:814f with SMTP id b27-20020a19645b000000b004fe82a7814fmr6815885lfj.37.1693897830251; Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:10:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D87B6D@smartserver.smartshare.dk> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 09:10:18 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Skip tests on Depends-on tag To: Patrick Robb Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=C3=B8rup?= , Adam Hassick , thomas@monjalon.net, ci@dpdk.org, dts@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Hello Patrick, Morten, On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 3:22=E2=80=AFAM Patrick Robb wro= te: > > Thanks for the suggestion. I'm also thinking the community lab should mov= e to an apply-patchset process like: > -if commit message contains "depends-on", then: > -get depends-on series id > -get referenced patch series and attempt to apply, and if success= ful then attempt to apply original patch on that. > -run testing > > I see that the github-robot reported a PASS, so they might already be doi= ng this. I'll raise it during the next CI meeting and see what the ci group= thinks or if they've discussed this before. Maybe there are some issues wi= th this which I'm not thinking of, but we'll see what the group thinks. My two cents (and copying Aaron): the ovsrobot (for dpdk) handles some part of the Depends-on: series-XXX logic, indeed. https://github.com/ovsrobot/pw-ci/commit/f2a73a46464424e977d4f8877e9a32314e= 4a0a07 https://github.com/ovsrobot/pw-ci/commit/3d263267cbd2d0c7b962aaaade9815379d= 03bba2 If you look at the 29416 or 29417 series branch history, you'll see changes from series 29415: https://github.com/ovsrobot/dpdk/commits/series_29417 --=20 David Marchand