From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>,
"Ajmera, Megha" <megha.ajmera@intel.com>,
"Singh, Jasvinder" <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>,
"Liguzinski, WojciechX" <wojciechx.liguzinski@intel.com>,
dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>,
"Zegota, AnnaX" <annax.zegota@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [Bug 826] red_autotest random failures
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 09:17:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8wNX=DCKa+FD=Mh6tv4gr-NawakWYmCGD2Qb2aD=tUaxA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM8PR11MB567043A45C9AEA1BAAF8F816EB9C9@DM8PR11MB5670.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 5:54 PM Dumitrescu, Cristian
<cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> wrote:
> On a different point, we should probably tweak our autotests to differentiate between logical failures and those failures related to resources not being available, and flag the test result accordingly in the report. For example, if memory allocation fails, the test should be flagged as "Not enough resources" instead of simply "Failed". In the first case, the next step should be fixing the test setup, while in the second case the next step should be fixing the code. What do people think on this?
In such case, the test must return TEST_SKIPPED.
I did a pass for cores count / specific hw requirements, some time ago.
See https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=e0f4a0ed4237
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-22 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-826-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/>
2021-11-12 13:51 ` David Marchand
2021-11-12 14:10 ` Lincoln Lavoie
2021-11-12 14:15 ` David Marchand
2021-11-15 11:51 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-11-15 17:26 ` Liguzinski, WojciechX
2021-11-18 22:10 ` Liguzinski, WojciechX
2021-11-19 7:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-19 16:53 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-11-19 17:25 ` Lincoln Lavoie
[not found] ` <BN9PR11MB53729251C262EEBB1134A61194619@BN9PR11MB5372.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2021-11-29 17:58 ` Brandon Lo
2021-11-30 7:51 ` Liguzinski, WojciechX
2021-12-10 13:31 ` Liguzinski, WojciechX
[not found] ` <SA0PR11MB46708D32B6B2EC31D3DCE17F975A9@SA0PR11MB4670.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <BY5PR11MB3926999DD139D10AD76D177F8F5B9@BY5PR11MB3926.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <BY5PR11MB39261E9379E18C67BB4FB9938F5B9@BY5PR11MB3926.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <BY5PR11MB3926DF1466F5815D5D2FEC798F259@BY5PR11MB3926.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <CAOE1vsPcKAiTMPGH1VYwoTccWi7b=9DJdObdPJZhKQvqNQsFmw@mail.gmail.com>
2022-02-02 14:51 ` Brandon Lo
2022-02-02 17:07 ` Danilewicz, MarcinX
2022-02-03 23:31 ` Danilewicz, MarcinX
2022-02-04 0:11 ` Brandon Lo
2022-03-09 10:01 ` Danilewicz, MarcinX
2022-03-09 14:48 ` Brandon Lo
2022-03-10 17:25 ` Danilewicz, MarcinX
2021-11-22 8:17 ` David Marchand [this message]
2021-11-22 13:34 ` Lincoln Lavoie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJFAV8wNX=DCKa+FD=Mh6tv4gr-NawakWYmCGD2Qb2aD=tUaxA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=annax.zegota@intel.com \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
--cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=megha.ajmera@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=wojciechx.liguzinski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).