DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>,
	 "Ajmera, Megha" <megha.ajmera@intel.com>,
	"Singh, Jasvinder" <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>,
	 "Liguzinski, WojciechX" <wojciechx.liguzinski@intel.com>,
	dev <dev@dpdk.org>,  Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>,
	"Zegota, AnnaX" <annax.zegota@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [Bug 826] red_autotest random failures
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 09:17:00 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8wNX=DCKa+FD=Mh6tv4gr-NawakWYmCGD2Qb2aD=tUaxA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM8PR11MB567043A45C9AEA1BAAF8F816EB9C9@DM8PR11MB5670.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 5:54 PM Dumitrescu, Cristian
<cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> wrote:
> On a different point, we should probably tweak our autotests to differentiate between logical failures and those failures related to resources not being available, and flag the test result accordingly in the report. For example, if memory allocation fails, the test should be flagged as "Not enough resources" instead of simply "Failed". In the first case, the next step should be fixing the test setup, while in the second case the next step should be fixing the code. What do people think on this?

In such case, the test must return TEST_SKIPPED.

I did a pass for cores count / specific hw requirements, some time ago.
See https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=e0f4a0ed4237

David Marchand

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-22  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-826-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/>
2021-11-12 13:51 ` David Marchand
2021-11-12 14:10   ` Lincoln Lavoie
2021-11-12 14:15     ` David Marchand
2021-11-15 11:51       ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-11-15 17:26         ` Liguzinski, WojciechX
2021-11-18 22:10           ` Liguzinski, WojciechX
2021-11-19  7:26             ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-19 16:53               ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2021-11-19 17:25                 ` Lincoln Lavoie
     [not found]                   ` <BN9PR11MB53729251C262EEBB1134A61194619@BN9PR11MB5372.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2021-11-29 17:58                     ` Brandon Lo
2021-11-30  7:51                       ` Liguzinski, WojciechX
2021-12-10 13:31                         ` Liguzinski, WojciechX
2021-11-22  8:17                 ` David Marchand [this message]
2021-11-22 13:34                   ` Lincoln Lavoie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJFAV8wNX=DCKa+FD=Mh6tv4gr-NawakWYmCGD2Qb2aD=tUaxA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=annax.zegota@intel.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=megha.ajmera@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=wojciechx.liguzinski@intel.com \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK CI discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci/0 ci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ci ci/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci \
	public-inbox-index ci

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git