From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D81F45E8F; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:15:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED3040B8F; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:15:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EA3409FA for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:15:14 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1734106514; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EI+2WJdu9q/LwqJVNHcNNbakiG2aCsc3V3AGY/HndgU=; b=QxwDeKGNV/FBvmLvGSAKAFTw3vn4VimM5EwJH0Flx+QniYmlCv6wZHZJZPeJZcleQzTE1q xiueg+QfTPe+Z/6WFn7MRDaU7TYKWfyNn+2zd4gnDihiC9T8YqOePzQ4WtjHI8nHDM3NNS lm3ksKSgjF25cqM3HhDptdp5g6wcNbI= Received: from mail-lj1-f200.google.com (mail-lj1-f200.google.com [209.85.208.200]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-378-Zqd3WK3CNkCBFXAbRK-f2A-1; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 11:15:12 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Zqd3WK3CNkCBFXAbRK-f2A-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: Zqd3WK3CNkCBFXAbRK-f2A Received: by mail-lj1-f200.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-30220597123so9053471fa.2 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 08:15:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1734106511; x=1734711311; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EI+2WJdu9q/LwqJVNHcNNbakiG2aCsc3V3AGY/HndgU=; b=b97lKZWHwB6zA1zwZxzkDZz1blzacpifHMmlj+kVRSOavxW3gd7htP1WfdMN8WNVZ0 9h/bOZzkysIWS9BVRSBXMPs/p+bzjiH0qIGRIxEPVBEg73TH9lyI/Dfmesc5aDWVqp/C Yrf6RKuEm6BnSR2PMmw++DD79shMoBcS3V+Kott9kc5+GIFrPXA81Xa9uFvWx9dnribg tz1UheCqJyR1+odwijoTVlMt/3JGboMM064KahM2oDRJOiHycWz9B68XHEindYg/2adP 5WM1O0XYwKQerM/yvPZPtr3kHX5hQLnaeCLWMXGftAoYjrE3Af5yKS3W0Uu1VzhXkkSD JjIg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUVmJhYgYTiMuWcfLPnG+kNaGI+qpD99C3a/ycV/SgGHX9jsguMaI19ewp+wLVeCz6aeA==@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzT0URIYwxDJYxwNevqz/TZ3if7hRO+pA/Vb7LvCSYWv1UWvrD8 zOK/iw347+UH/3NL/V471xwoCxXUsLFRWf48v+IriakMOc2FDlFLiEvI4uSG8TJGGeNVuhyk3tf +8+M+zYcPvnma9dyVTxjRQmAjihGpa6QMMg5S/a9yPjSspSvzItCN+d54h+DjibNSXv04tL3hV6 MgFyMRs8uJE4Uzeg== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsfetUsVnYPpIxbcqZD2lX5PVl6QK69L1kabhvnkOhcGk3DmMFSR1KAWc62+Ws TMosjKvFji/m73flKuB2coS9YDDcA79kUklvwZi6g X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:220c:b0:302:1d8e:f4fd with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-302545b6dffmr12201031fa.35.1734106511151; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 08:15:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHPsuoZjdYNAaOL1SS4tydM69YsKjikp+9Mx2r3sqGn47+QGBsUiU7jU/X33DEdRNHHmRlpI9DmwGnnPqjabEA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:220c:b0:302:1d8e:f4fd with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-302545b6dffmr12200801fa.35.1734106510802; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 08:15:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:14:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Intel CI failing on updated DTS patchset To: Luca Vizzarro Cc: "rajesh.t.puttaswamy@intel.com" , "ci@dpdk.org" , Paul Szczepanek , Thomas Monjalon , Aaron Conole , Bruce Richardson , "Mcnamara, John" X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: NgUpwezls8HS4EiZIPQQcF0hqOiViaCqqASxMYdCIQg_1734106511 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 5:00=E2=80=AFPM Luca Vizzarro wrote: > I=E2=80=99ve sent a v2 fixing this patch, but for some reason the CI has = failed again with the same problem, even if it=E2=80=99s been resolved. The= lines referenced are also no longer there. I don't really see the point of reporting doc testing per patch from Intel = CI. Documentation testing per patch is broken in Intel CI, as doc/ updates are filtered: http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/CY5PR11MB618735108D3E9D90C67EEF96F5DA9@CY5PR11MB6= 187.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/ So this report is about testing merged code, but not your changes. --=20 David Marchand