From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A6BA0C53 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:36:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9697041154; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:36:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8AB40E5A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:36:47 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635928607; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EF21BcxN911oClwn7g8sBpdmgOIlutsq0fGya5O0ZYM=; b=KNJLwGHuVCZc18/oTn65W+Max4zL8f29npBNXoByBj+lg5TqKAqlq87euquknYTOprWHF3 u/q0c8zVS6V0jjMbz1wK9YOgJzGT2YZlHpDz1R1SBqvC11eE9a4z4D9GoWWGPkSrYDHm6c yVZ2C9fFlQc5uwBATw5gggBIGzzEY9M= Received: from mail-lj1-f198.google.com (mail-lj1-f198.google.com [209.85.208.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-260-7ebdtAn2NySgHVE-ERtQGQ-1; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 04:36:39 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 7ebdtAn2NySgHVE-ERtQGQ-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f198.google.com with SMTP id v2-20020a2e5042000000b00216bb21d8b8so780741ljd.13 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 01:36:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EF21BcxN911oClwn7g8sBpdmgOIlutsq0fGya5O0ZYM=; b=SKZ7a9G+fFLFqdE9ZboQtsId3LWkPybx1t3g6nULM3Cp9uaa6JlocKVAakVu0hMaGs ubFbEwC+JY1KBx9JTtLXUKsBMMA2EQov+Y8YTHbI3OGVKSrnUhOr56vxhdRIDeg1BWNw N0BWUvb6fKq4eyqP9rakwZ578Lo1i41vuFf2ILmBNPiWScQRs3B/3IUt/Bl82V3yvRz8 6jKZ5wwpBrIzzsmgaV/2JHYJcVGd9wVkgUEJ1gTzjP9bbzAi22u57e+agA+eouexTtWs zqme9pSPi5iWH2WP6Nq1+K8p/hS6iQ+sNImyEFRYL8noUphsM4sUXGClRS7rtr1Mr0VH tpJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532bWZGMctx1meKWF/6bwNBfa8KhQo5Z/x7VXILM+jqat4LZTSee 4PUkrf5WCt/PZwcLf8dTYIlTe3zqnacHGo4u2gfntB7hSXHGPWfjmxUThZA3HP2NaiZ6zvdfxvp 3mXXMMYY3efoeZMeTow== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8e76:: with SMTP id t22mr9535588ljk.81.1635928598059; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 01:36:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw1nhfNiiJxZCvWLtRte3ypHuMnNl340PvXuKbke7jI4kZtBjou+Nqq9Nre65ND7qwL5ZXJXRbYvSOqtsckGsw= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8e76:: with SMTP id t22mr9535560ljk.81.1635928597807; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 01:36:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211102104748.57078-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:36:26 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Xia, Chenbo" , Maxime Coquelin Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Liu, Changpeng" , Thomas Monjalon , Aaron Conole , dpdklab , ci@dpdk.org Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] vhost: rename driver callbacks struct X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:16 AM Xia, Chenbo wrote: > Testing issues reported in patchwork is expected as SPDK uses > this struct, so we can ignore it as SPDK will rename it when it > adapts to DPDK 21.11 Please, no. We can't simply say "ignore failure in CI". The SPDK build test must be disabled in CI first. You can create a bugzilla and assign it to UNH lab. Example: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579 Once done, we can merge this patch in DPDK. In parallel, either prepare the patch or talk to SPDK guys to handle this change. Once this is done, update the bugzilla so that we can get SPDK build tested again in CI. Thanks. -- David Marchand