From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A471A0524 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:16:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E762160BAA; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:16:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA53160BA2 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:16:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1618298172; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IXqEBoq2ZJwGb9fwkt1ZICS5eFkLBuIVoZcaI4mYbd8=; b=Fq6ByfT5vx764ivDBlNbY8uJSw1ce1eyrDv79I0s98tO4RBvela3JWnE366qvksMLWKiTF ALwzl5sZPV34SNFj7HQhs3KqaIaxoTY0GPQEZfOdzjRvVy+9WiBJl44iD2K7o5cgDqWkFd KoJ+UL5bkBNth/1yhL1cEI2XzV3f+CU= Received: from mail-vs1-f71.google.com (mail-vs1-f71.google.com [209.85.217.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-583--kn0ghRPPTeIuytXl6UR6A-1; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 03:16:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: -kn0ghRPPTeIuytXl6UR6A-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f71.google.com with SMTP id q10-20020a67cc0a0000b0290217031c8d7bso799884vsl.12 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 00:16:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IXqEBoq2ZJwGb9fwkt1ZICS5eFkLBuIVoZcaI4mYbd8=; b=g2tONM52hoVD7Towkw3jligPmQWf+zD+KyRZDSGxAcnhmHH5cVRMX+VMq51SjCC1Rr qnJoE2NTq0PKqKMnQ++suHkg/b4YHT42Ce16K+3bH7YINnMdIHupYKqOlaThYMez3OkE d+rSIV9mtV63MKYU7sb/zmlvh4IYUzjbQbYrtxcQuIcoYgUaW74buktPArQ2pSHIPuzZ eBOitiWS5Vgg8MBhJY4BoXS2L893yZjRKoVMeVPxYR3Z9ztrx1FLiESN7HRgRnC66/Al jviMmvjCSlpwhW2UuUeCanePK5y6rMvAGm7RrzRHl4jTdc02ap1mun4mYA68a6/tKL2F MFgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533M6hW82b+1spEAsOgcvZY+PVHh6sykANQm+mreu71bZahYdBZe Fd3FfLf359y9dizZwTtcBOlfR1P6LsFwGRRN9zotd96VqYLeEaBnFhTcjaB30i/7bNxf7JuJBHZ w/Ga3hJAjFEFUbh5nmQ== X-Received: by 2002:a67:f84a:: with SMTP id b10mr23662623vsp.10.1618298169433; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 00:16:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkd1HYauTAjcl3Ht2Hq29HavQwwODrn4Wmm9M7VVSwZkMVtaDaLjmzXUUWBYEq0BwSKGhW7sqaNDbMKjHRSQk= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f84a:: with SMTP id b10mr23662602vsp.10.1618298169223; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 00:16:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3565653.Ar8n8QqFrN@thomas> In-Reply-To: <3565653.Ar8n8QqFrN@thomas> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:15:58 +0200 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon , Timothy McDaniel , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Ray Kinsella , Aaron Conole , dpdklab Cc: "abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com" , "harry.van.haaren@intel.com" , dev , Shijith Thotton , Akhil Goyal , Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula , "mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com" , ci@dpdk.org Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [pull-request] dpdk-next-net-eventdev - 21.05 - PRE-RC1 X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 12:12 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 12/04/2021 15:20, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran: > > http://dpdk.org/git/next/dpdk-next-eventdev > > Pulled, thanks. > > Note few changes in titles like uppercases for acronyms, > or "add support" simplified as "support", > and release notes moved in the right place. The ABI check now reports an error on event/dlb. The reason is that the event/dlb driver has been removed, and so the check complains about a missing dump. This will have to be fixed quickly or reverted. This has been missed by multiple people, so trying to understand why. The ABI check should have caught this when run by maintainers (/me looks at Thomas and Jerin). The CI should have caught it too. But, v1 did not apply. For v2, I can see a doc generation issue reported by Intel CI that I can't reproduce, so it could be just noise. I can't find reports for Travis or GHA and I could not find in the robot logs why the series_15708 branch was not created. Looking at UNH reports: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2021-March/182956.html But looking at the log: [2713/2716] Compiling C object 'drivers/a715181@@rte_event_octeontx2@sta/meson-generated_.._rte_event_octeontx2.pmd.c.o'. [2714/2716] Linking static target drivers/librte_event_octeontx2.a. [2715/2716] Generating rte_event_octeontx2.sym_chk with a meson_exe.py custom command. [2716/2716] Linking target drivers/librte_event_octeontx2.so.21.1. Error: cannot find librte_event_dlb.dump in /home-local/jenkins-local/jenkins-agent/workspace/Ubuntu18.04-Compile-DPDK-ABI/dpdk/build-gcc-shared/install Is this something that has been fixed since then? I don't have the main branch/recent series status from UNH, but at least GHA and Travis are now complaining about ABI. -- David Marchand