From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E8245AEE; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 09:50:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC5140E1D; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 09:50:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B8C40A75 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2024 09:50:32 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1728460232; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=G8uIpjCIrIXyHDjZTKTXI3zD0IYPLAsLK56qtKwPNbo=; b=Vz6v2wqVaQURuXaDRs/gr6FgY+YES/9q4I59UnvVJY9/GQSFt3y4fKAqAabi9DyEPbTGvV PRn1wJszwRVOPCHDH1BxJw7EoB/LSSvpq7zchxAfFmNZXJDHsZUy2p/nSB5uNChkJqDIQ+ EVt+bZNmDYl+6BvcxzoRMTgjjDvhE+8= Received: from mail-lf1-f69.google.com (mail-lf1-f69.google.com [209.85.167.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-15-suK5pNX8OAK1fJTgkpyxvQ-1; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 03:47:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: suK5pNX8OAK1fJTgkpyxvQ-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5398f3d3757so5575863e87.1 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:47:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728460045; x=1729064845; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=G8uIpjCIrIXyHDjZTKTXI3zD0IYPLAsLK56qtKwPNbo=; b=S9X9LcppQ04GUyyaA2i4xbBVwOFQeK1eOoGREpd9Er+pPBycH/czbTRcaqa9DQ640e dRkL264V5tTMKDdUSPkSJ2GBfIVt0pxgTKHTW89fNNLtnjZoNSUcby+svnoSs6hx7qfM AT830+cZqOmDJptJCEsN1cw1EluomdlASFlnURSKqZWju25POmxQ6dxaNdcRniOmKX8D /ckmasV5/VcheZ2rcb2e93j07tltBwsoQxUhaeRQuiuZL2R9zLLP+CLaEqaXOaqW+VGO ehgbTuYVJaNRPJnAXB76KtPig3+OA4vGO/GyL4zU/tDd20rGqSeec+kn8K/QzOYdw5bI yrBQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXF8C4MEIYuSSVxhPIywT9mCEuyeUrrf4yOZVk5lFvSYDt23+a6nBbfbmwsB/MidmgSbQ==@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyN4B58lKjyuglg9G2rOEeUcoKXkY9Tej90yMKNh875mCwQPxOJ 3wlm213U8+n7KffL+jPbvYk4qhad54jADaBsy9rtHFNshcpD1+t7SWdWpgWuI+It0vgeyvsTVKt /WqcwDWqwJ/rf0FQwP366K7MjuXIjEp7gBFfN9T8LwSFI63/67P9c7R90Dr4T0ALMfIK9ggfYPf 1+/mWmeUA1Jr8Xsg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:b12:b0:530:daeb:c1d4 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-539c488d8a3mr834655e87.12.1728460044769; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:47:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFZcYhIkNkZjGGqyfXZ9gqRpq+ccqnV2FkvlRqSAiKuNfTgPvXk5HbUnly0N2YfsRwDrIpRic2lSbADmM9H5bM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:b12:b0:530:daeb:c1d4 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-539c488d8a3mr834636e87.12.1728460044350; Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:47:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20241008192543.800702-1-probb@iol.unh.edu> <20241008204311.6928528a@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20241008204311.6928528a@hermes.local> From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 09:47:12 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Increasing ci meson version to .57 To: Stephen Hemminger , Tyler Retzlaff Cc: Patrick Robb , dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, zhoumin@loongson.cn, aconole@redhat.com, rajesh.t.puttaswamy@intel.com, ci@dpdk.org X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 5:43=E2=80=AFAM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:25:43 -0400 > Patrick Robb wrote: > > > There is a proposed increase in the minimum meson version to .57 > > This patch aligns the linux setup ci script with this change. > > > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Robb > > I wonder if we shouldn't push it to something later. > Debian stable is using 1.0.1 and testing is up to 1.5.2 > > 0.57.0 was released on Feb 14,2021 > 1.0.0 was released on Dec 23, 2022 > > So getting a release that was more recent makes sense. > The users stuck on enterprise distro's are going to have to resort > to pip anyway to get a new version. Tyler reported an issue for Windows with meson > 0.57. https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/ZvuoUizQiDeE62zB@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.co= m/ --=20 David Marchand