From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D7EA0A0F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:37:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD0141280; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:37:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583664127D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:37:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1625067473; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=dSSwcvzTUjXbT4RWI5Z13YsbocAoeBMOSeQnYtpbqLo=; b=IBaLssOIixpwGa1fG0obx5OPvsVdRHxs8Iiyi75RnBG3pz/gm8i937eEcLf89TWeOEX/hW chpNMRRRWom7xCRTX5xm3VGHpNPA3tJl2sca1+CTRCfXH1nTV9pLunc3BkTxPPE9ZO8AEo 0kEA07hi+YZC+Wc+HPeuUEnqBr4430Q= Received: from mail-ua1-f70.google.com (mail-ua1-f70.google.com [209.85.222.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-244-VmqFVev6MpKkPIF4cp63hA-1; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 11:37:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: VmqFVev6MpKkPIF4cp63hA-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f70.google.com with SMTP id w22-20020a9f2c960000b02902939e0aaf4fso503155uaj.8 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:37:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dSSwcvzTUjXbT4RWI5Z13YsbocAoeBMOSeQnYtpbqLo=; b=SViYfvopdxbGXaq1i2iIVd9fbFg8Nc+gnIuaz0Snn22kDabKGrAOeP/8Dn4Tmdld6j YxrPWSvQN/YTqWimYK3AjtwdIMQ/P31q8Ik0W8JU5mub1+ly/QFzqTTjo6BqH9hhdQrM 7UfDJSAFKvKGo+8nXuliLYNFfvEZDFHKiSyIiRxc7ugPk6ZPa1f3oGzUlvq0zKjJWINV VBHdmaIwF7ApjFTi1ZhKu/UjIyR3fy3V4WVFNGXCslCD4vzE4a1jomMJkgvcgDLNjNRq 5iR6dqwhiquWZKR3L3fQvSH93PcoqpPJvG9eX6IKq+zvyjJCc74duBhrIuDkgPw2ehWn XOIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5327b7xG85Jzh+s5qH0wrUTAnwK7lEo5lyIT5/yqXUBNmqg1KGds tvkNpR/nBc9XPvVxbfwqVOryFPcaRsG2PHcJBjXM+ZeuKM/t5tPT45yWdJ77BdSQUa65Feb1YmU 4S/svbi6oobZv7fQSvw== X-Received: by 2002:a67:fe90:: with SMTP id b16mr31541429vsr.5.1625067472013; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:37:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxukYNjvRDY6+WPegohNdBvQ5VX+OAkL2B4scbsTmFjkDwMEdTeQ7ne5AcXpIdaicnM0jkqw0yZpPdbMFoF3GA= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fe90:: with SMTP id b16mr31541404vsr.5.1625067471851; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:37:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:37:40 +0200 Message-ID: To: dpdklab Cc: ci@dpdk.org, dts@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole , Lincoln Lavoie Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: [dpdk-ci] Failures for nic_single_core test X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Hello guys, Since 06/28, I see the nic_single_core test failing most of the time with the system hosting the i40e nic. I suspect this has something to do with a recent change with reporting performance difference in DTS, could you have a look and confirm? -- David Marchand