From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C9DA0C41 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:45:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F5B410EA; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:45:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BBC4067E for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:45:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1632991522; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+2Db2PaFr/PBpVgXzUkCutL+b90uF4J2uWNlORsVRBA=; b=KpdTVsNBcQgC2CXb8FOxchPXqa09HmUjA+H834swPcWAb5slj9w/uh1AtScxBaRbwA7yHg bO2MhB5fYTEb1DtN0hGEmK+h2CkHXJbLW3D6p9j3AG5Ope3ZqWxsSndZTtKeUDLTtKjmkp VZtezQdR7tyjyShOARiRB7DTy6YI+o4= Received: from mail-lf1-f70.google.com (mail-lf1-f70.google.com [209.85.167.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-591-pvxyeQgbOL2X9spac2oIzA-1; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 04:45:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: pvxyeQgbOL2X9spac2oIzA-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f70.google.com with SMTP id m2-20020ac24ac2000000b003f524eae63eso4968167lfp.10 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 01:45:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+2Db2PaFr/PBpVgXzUkCutL+b90uF4J2uWNlORsVRBA=; b=Nj5bhNgtEEg9WOEsrV8V4v+4zusYaJizXL7t6nJLmZkhEGptRIm1mObAQTHIAACBml hjh0VhR5F7MifAeRUEzWX++3j71QFaulgf9Dk8c0mOq2aNCw455NqTm7LmPJURimhEwI JXOm62g4PBArTHeAn9zvUnOZlFbR0YFoWvty88jG3msRdJVdXF1QwFdbLjesCXYtom9Z 7xBHHg3rfpcqJk6pZOUoHKXYJFBwsPXszdqedW+qPTQYBvGMqsRaMevVZBQeuYoF8yX0 frKyWB9U1eDQq7QRtw+jJwW2pTRkeMZnVtr2xY3POld5XsX9oquHfBWQ7690bKTXGWbN CmEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5330ThyJKf/fuqmtprIkpJJHC0RovkPVNAiwHHM13yS4mNG8b3yg qc24D28m+urZEnZi6o9esh9j6bBIQpj4+o4bi0xcsuqalGixS34+28F7fEVu6AjwddPwvv1L5Vi J+LdVrDENgOrDuzDQRQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2f02:: with SMTP id v2mr4622411ljv.46.1632991519239; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 01:45:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3PAlpDQaHnoHLdlC2noTpj8GebGZ2hLUhnXrj4VB6FLuHHHdKh6KHLN4+hDds7LAtQynWStEUt12H2tE7jjc= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2f02:: with SMTP id v2mr4622393ljv.46.1632991519041; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 01:45:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210910022402.26620-1-chenbo.xia@intel.com> <20210918022443.12719-1-chenbo.xia@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:45:08 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Xia, Chenbo" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , ci@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole , dpdklab Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/7] Removal of PCI bus ABIs X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Hello Chenbo, On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 9:38 AM Xia, Chenbo wrote: > > Gentle ping for comments.. Sorry, I'll try to look at it. > > @David, could you help me understand what is the compile error in Fedora 31? > DPDK_compile_spdk failure is expected as the header name for SPDK is changed, > I am not sure if it's the same error... The error log is odd (no compilation "backtrace"). You'll need to test spdk manually I guess. -- David Marchand