From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB99A04BB for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 11:51:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096E5F3E; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 11:51:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DE2A3 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 11:51:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601977862; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OE05p/n3ao6K6fz0kiZqcmnz131UcHL0tXibCBQEk0Q=; b=FLzKKgjQnHeYEJYuel8FCANlBfdX4r6v3TKfYWC2uqVpq+1DDVRLUKDvj92onR/g/+UP/T VsjjgZ05HbEu8/XLkRs/So0LNWGLe1WDUuAV5ah+z2YINuIzmETz3McNolMfCUaOVLIxbB Qq1kB39xDwacfb3GwUl3F2etDi5Zw1M= Received: from mail-ua1-f72.google.com (mail-ua1-f72.google.com [209.85.222.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-583-tRGTZtE7NeKQJCGdI8eSbA-1; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 05:51:01 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tRGTZtE7NeKQJCGdI8eSbA-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f72.google.com with SMTP id q3so559957uad.16 for ; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 02:51:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OE05p/n3ao6K6fz0kiZqcmnz131UcHL0tXibCBQEk0Q=; b=jkIdkBiEa5dKTdy2QG/eBwgXL2ztKXcs7RqviLlrLl+PaTAUgwQqufCggHyjoH9OVN ptpuHnKWBMPAqb4b8Xag66vVqVoRKflpb2aWbg4MW4fqTCDuHFy6GO1kiyV4qHQwcOPc xI6hIRvvKZvySewCI9ShcVsIY/Eo2pxqfZGUGdywopT2uEQA8OTYJ0ml74mFzQcawJ47 xRYsBkPtxnKO9fzBFaDusX7yw4+Xza/5+QjBFhQho94YglKaYj387W0XUzQaqBpq46HA OkEkjXQHqM4wh25sJ8n+l+oDsS2r+Cyd155sPwOs0PqZ7kcXUVHVqHbB1ucK6k3rabwn 6RHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ilx0WEBypGs91IMzGNvR4VhXTKXsEjzmBm5Y76RTy9qM+u9I+ YCIQuDm/ubigxdP1XBLpi69p2Rt/3rWOmv6mi6NKkIKey21wfmDpIeTT4TE/PTS820qGBpkE0tX PnTiQAAaAkLERL2XT+w== X-Received: by 2002:a67:fd44:: with SMTP id g4mr2622012vsr.18.1601977860317; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 02:51:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+1tkM1M/C7M1RYVPZfSXPDzd/0moDqsspo3HVmEgCjnfHHZTJwh4FNr/hIYtS21talYuNhXS8hddIqA0wtII= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fd44:: with SMTP id g4mr2622002vsr.18.1601977860076; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 02:51:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 11:50:49 +0200 Message-ID: To: Brandon Lo , dpdklab@iol.unh.edu, Lincoln Lavoie Cc: ci@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson , Thomas Monjalon , Trishan de Lanerolle , j.hendergart@f5.com Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 6:44 PM David Marchand wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 8:51 AM David Marchand wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 8:24 PM Brandon Lo wrote: > > > We have successfully added Fedora Rawhide to our production pipeline > > > for Meson compile testing. > > > The image for the container will be updated on a weekly basis. > > > > > > The version of GCC that it is currently running (10.2) catches that > > > the drivers/vdpa/ifc/base/ifcvf.h file redefines > > > VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM, originally from > > > /usr/include/linux/virtio_config.h. > > > I am just giving you guys a heads-up before the failure report catches > > > anyone off guard. > > > > Brandon, > > > > Before putting this new job online, the build issue should have been > > fixed on the dpdk side. > > All new submitted series are now getting a fail flag that we must > > inspect to check whether it is because of this known issue or > > something else. > > > > Please, disable this job. > > The vdpa/ifc issue should be fixed in the main branch now (thanks to Maxime). > But next-net and other subtrees will still have the issue until they > catch on this fix. > > > > > > There is also the OpenSuse job failing. > > Can you investigate? > > Still failing. I do not see failures for the OpenSuse job anymore, but since I got no reply, pinging again to get a clear status on this. Thanks. -- David Marchand