From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Adam Hassick <ahassick@iol.unh.edu>, Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, ci@dpdk.org, alialnu@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: DPDK clone/fetch URL
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:27:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8xu+=eXs2shujb8iyoMzW6n-5vK2h9s_dt2=vLeXv5VAw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC-YWqjHSSqTtrTvjvBKT0LMDPhe0qG7n2EEBYHRjMpQ+5Ggwg@mail.gmail.com>
Hello guys,
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:30 PM Adam Hassick <ahassick@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Yes, mirroring the next-* branches would help to reduce the complexity of creating patch series artifacts.
> As Patrick wrote, moving the clones for the periodic testing on DPDK main and DPDK LTS should be a trivial change.
>
> However, most of the load we put on that server originates from our testing on new patch series.
> I am working on a new script for creating the tarball artifacts from incoming patch series. It only pulls down either 1 or 2 repositories rather than main and all next-* branches for every single patch.
> Once deployed, I expect this script to reduce the load on git.dpdk.org significantly.
> Also, I anticipate that I can modify this new script to pull main down from GitHub. Then, only incoming patch series for next-* branches will produce any load on git.dpdk.org.
As mentionned in
https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/CAJFAV8xSVqkTjrqSL0gWkg9Y+EyMg4=jxwOOzhtaXp6HDeG_cQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#t,
the mirroring script is ready on dpdk.org.
The branches are not up yet, I'll put some update in this thread when they are.
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-30 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-27 11:20 Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-27 16:09 ` Patrick Robb
2023-11-27 20:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-27 21:32 ` Adam Hassick
2023-11-28 21:16 ` Patrick Robb
2023-11-30 9:27 ` David Marchand [this message]
2023-11-30 17:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-30 15:57 ` Aaron Conole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJFAV8xu+=eXs2shujb8iyoMzW6n-5vK2h9s_dt2=vLeXv5VAw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=ahassick@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=alialnu@nvidia.com \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=probb@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).