From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EBB42FF6; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:15:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F96410D3; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:15:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3302540A8B for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:15:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1691392540; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uLb3E/EvqB7bQ+GzLQBZpnGQuiV5jX7mjGuDayv4yZg=; b=U79ightxih0pIFHJHlJa2WRY4kEUWuzS5mbR9/EvmpYXjv7KBRnKAQTWCKW/kb+nWhVP1y N1s8DbtFaHssf4JZ/IAnirrGoFQs9X/xOHqoy097ThsVkzh9/yFydvA2yA6Rar4j/X4z0S zSwfakvHRYGZbBXjjyzNTA2xQ+kyuzg= Received: from mail-lf1-f69.google.com (mail-lf1-f69.google.com [209.85.167.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-577-OawCqsrIMtOD9oA2OnoxyQ-1; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 03:15:39 -0400 X-MC-Unique: OawCqsrIMtOD9oA2OnoxyQ-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4fe27502459so4064854e87.3 for ; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:15:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691392522; x=1691997322; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uLb3E/EvqB7bQ+GzLQBZpnGQuiV5jX7mjGuDayv4yZg=; b=J6NAXeX3SS6KN7oxgiVsFKNaaa4pYttl+kRSaJuBMMXtrsA1oAwCmiZ1Brt84leJ3A GbL5wJfyfdCN4m3BOV6ajpameyN1UQkLs6TsbTclSKHIMroMkZ1gGk94fsiGiiBcvDZk 5oEoe9fclmfLJK/EdVxcQbjBrSxCriJZZjweKNDmK7ZxySRvBsORUg985dCLetDjpT2K wmcq/HsnURbASa29xPnjL2acx+7L3x17+6KJzGxlERtK00U+XiKtYQAwCqmPB8Nvq5En sAZ4mZbHTfZREvLPeJtFf0bl/m5EXegxiBvDc4OmVpQ0ip6RzxnegErtEbm5G3RSsf2o K4KQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzqFL8uWVfrCvEeSErIFshpE8eAtJwYXJHrzUWJ/WjPktxbcuwJ 8YsNMYoOSDz9ZEQkQUtWTepQxRkci8uCLyWd2IHfgwL+YmHpICK8K0gUCs/ddN1y2wVOmbzjzio ZRMa/QmlX58bDDlFKow== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3e1e:b0:4f7:6a40:9fd7 with SMTP id i30-20020a0565123e1e00b004f76a409fd7mr6215361lfv.47.1691392522668; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:15:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFs/7o7bAswx9Xz5w7Lk+oQsdUhXfd4/V/Holds0PL17K5JWGABEXBZljslq89r6AIMyGCQif0k693fcEI9RcY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3e1e:b0:4f7:6a40:9fd7 with SMTP id i30-20020a0565123e1e00b004f76a409fd7mr6215339lfv.47.1691392522392; Mon, 07 Aug 2023 00:15:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230801160500.67480-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20230801160500.67480-3-stephen@networkplumber.org> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:15:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kni: remove deprecated kernel network interface To: Bruce Richardson Cc: ci@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger , Thomas Monjalon , Maxime Coquelin , Chenbo Xia , Anatoly Burakov , Cristian Dumitrescu , Nithin Dabilpuram , Kiran Kumar K , Sunil Kumar Kori , Satha Rao , Ferruh Yigit X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 3:26=E2=80=AFPM Bruce Richardson wrote: > > With this removal, there is no remaining out of tree Linux kernel modul= e > > to compile/test in DPDK sources. This means that jobs (like the one in > > UNH lab that was compile-testing KNI against the latest Linux kernel > > sources) can be disabled. > > > > Important note: this mail does not ask for any change to LTS releases > > testing. If KNI was built and tested with LTS releases, you should > > continue to do so. > > > Given that there are no linux modules left, can we consider changing the > default setting of "enable_kmods" from "no" to "yes". For FreeBSD there a= re > no in-tree modules that can support DPDK, so the kernel modules for that = OS > should always be built. The only reason for it being disabled was Linux, > but that seems unnecessary now. This seems ok to me. --=20 David Marchand