From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65918A04C9 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:59:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4004F2BAB; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:59:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC33CDE0 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:59:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600073952; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3HGrCEeYh46lMd3MMpsijQAuMoIdNVY4x2whJ3DzJyU=; b=KlB4YycgJDmvie28n/EM2x8CphiQDf8UShw7UpgdAFzOO433i6+TrwRn1FCdlsEYOv18Qr CDh/B33SAN7Dn6J2Iszd0ENgC1YRmrIkXwtG9u8dmJvOsKy+4b36vc6/0r8o959Mqm/SvY U7CeIkkkBgr9N4lwEJkXIHmyf74pFvA= Received: from mail-vk1-f198.google.com (mail-vk1-f198.google.com [209.85.221.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-594-TR91cOxcM-yaYi0rFox-aQ-1; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 04:59:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: TR91cOxcM-yaYi0rFox-aQ-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id x17so1650775vke.5 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 01:59:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3HGrCEeYh46lMd3MMpsijQAuMoIdNVY4x2whJ3DzJyU=; b=rBTxB3shyK/6bB4TDiAV+oF64yf+b6XJG+uSc5lODxsQHxTTZNQt4zTZPHJJf5fvxf l/CYJ8xPbExBY9n0jVixFPOc8+UG6o3khGObNB2PHQt9ChAUX/vEpmtdtZg7+4AE8Qco 4awnJ+CJOjEc+b0cy2ALML/hc9bNxOSTQxFtRleqTJ6+MTPwlHqsgDJDgzk1aL1Mu3a+ 5lcIzDPO6z6Jco3bGspORVNSuWuvR0JST/k47Gre4kpK3l/v5whvKHvB0bx3Kk/zmQz7 ibXPxaw8wFe9QfLXjaPrVAzGS7RD1vGZNmyDIL8V2LEGE3mm0Racxu42Plz6euO5MvMO hG0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530k9+B53HYaF2Gk1FMITHTEx7RUoaiK+mNTKzEgaAI3HMJiQPXI m8MlAKsMeSAMScpyWb9LQKD0xTCXmsoW+js/AFF8A+XdYKkd/CvM9C4LO3vOSsK1lrhE06se25l wc3V5Gq2nFn38l4fSgA== X-Received: by 2002:a67:504:: with SMTP id 4mr6862491vsf.23.1600073950255; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 01:59:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2tUcACfIo9iJrL8NM/E0mo5JOXDbS3GaD77xibdUJ2BCn1X9c2JI97rXRgV84nylFulirJfRfjl14Nm/c2oY= X-Received: by 2002:a67:504:: with SMTP id 4mr6862487vsf.23.1600073949988; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 01:59:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:58:59 +0200 Message-ID: To: Lincoln Lavoie Cc: ci@dpdk.org Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Arch Linux failures X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 3:50 PM Lincoln Lavoie wrote: > We are aware of a failure with the Arch Linux testing. This has been disabled in the pipelines for now, and we are looking into the issue. Apologizes for the false negative tests, but you can safely ignore those from the last 24 hours. Ah thanks, I wanted to send a mail about this, last Friday.. Will the failed tests be rerun? -- David Marchand