From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B71A04BA for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 08:51:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D6F1D58B; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 08:51:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382E21D410 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 08:51:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601621478; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/RCIH3zWInrtM47iHo6PP3uq7m+A8EXP8WGVKWL7uXc=; b=a7FnPyxQFDuy89c8VRVnrpz+yu+ogJCtgJyw68DPShZ/ZpqxggVLP902q3ljTLjv5s/MFV tX1vyaYfpOTob8P7b5Zt3LE0JLSjRiyM9e9BrdorqaE62f8cVdxEdEXK4RxyHZDXKusTYe aIBZrpWKs6SqnggDd7E1oVD1D+/8G8w= Received: from mail-ua1-f70.google.com (mail-ua1-f70.google.com [209.85.222.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-280-2Jk4erhSMwm1rexjVbwb2g-1; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 02:51:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 2Jk4erhSMwm1rexjVbwb2g-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f70.google.com with SMTP id m17so181057uan.19 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:51:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/RCIH3zWInrtM47iHo6PP3uq7m+A8EXP8WGVKWL7uXc=; b=FRc/GIC1pCOXBF8J/sPy2G+wMF6CpLezZkG5GfRhAOH0YsxylElAr7XEMSKEviKcNG rq0H6XesaAHX4QdWyyA0XvAN6lo1KyqV7YT9B+X7x1CcKC17ZjqAGJDQp7qdXMaSxtc8 RAFzrBdSVwCkSwbDuMRmSxnC5bBCjtyPzOgEHLjOEkm/7rXKyvnFhWWe+AssXoBJfONb YiIJ6ljcdkPnV6CmtEDfUi4+euhDJ4luylPcDgz63A350TAzfv794nZq9nRcUq4RH11h 7IlvkUoasEMhkwjBVglP95jmzUcGEJa9o4jrSNfbasf5tD4V27a5N3oNvbogklziY/QJ Nf0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532b9g21HlpaliRInCDoUxc6Ws7Vq1pT+PRU7y/GouEDGYwamtDz 8P4ifR9arJre4bi8FXcivK7T8Aip7O0PJWAdnxob1PrA4L/EITa78eqRn3d22FyX7jhx21p6oaj to1m4i52q5MSDP5E9Cg== X-Received: by 2002:a67:fd7a:: with SMTP id h26mr400486vsa.27.1601621476768; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:51:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydXv0UZSVdzqBYAs1fCXBqTDU0gLDnHV4xvPL21YXjZd2bodJWo1FcqUT9jpz51Q2hUitj4LUtfuPDhkdVfVI= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fd7a:: with SMTP id h26mr400480vsa.27.1601621476510; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:51:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 08:51:05 +0200 Message-ID: To: Brandon Lo , Xiao Wang , Maxime Coquelin Cc: ci@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson , dev , Thomas Monjalon , dpdklab@iol.unh.edu Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Fedora Rawhide Meson Compile Testing - DPDK Compile Warning X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 8:24 PM Brandon Lo wrote: > We have successfully added Fedora Rawhide to our production pipeline > for Meson compile testing. > The image for the container will be updated on a weekly basis. > > The version of GCC that it is currently running (10.2) catches that > the drivers/vdpa/ifc/base/ifcvf.h file redefines > VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM, originally from > /usr/include/linux/virtio_config.h. > I am just giving you guys a heads-up before the failure report catches > anyone off guard. Brandon, Before putting this new job online, the build issue should have been fixed on the dpdk side. All new submitted series are now getting a fail flag that we must inspect to check whether it is because of this known issue or something else. Please, disable this job. There is also the OpenSuse job failing. Can you investigate? Xiao, Maxime, Anyone free to have a look on the vdpa build issue on Fedora Rawhide? FAILED: drivers/libtmp_rte_pmd_ifc.a.p/vdpa_ifc_ifcvf_vdpa.c.o cc -Idrivers/libtmp_rte_pmd_ifc.a.p -Idrivers -I../drivers -Idrivers/vdpa/ifc -I../drivers/vdpa/ifc -I../drivers/vdpa/ifc/base -Idrivers/bus/pci -I../drivers/bus/pci -I../drivers/bus/pci/linux -I. -I.. -Iconfig -I../config -Ilib/librte_eal/include -I../lib/librte_eal/include -Ilib/librte_eal/linux/include -I../lib/librte_eal/linux/include -Ilib/librte_eal/x86/include -I../lib/librte_eal/x86/include -Ilib/librte_eal/common -I../lib/librte_eal/common -Ilib/librte_eal -I../lib/librte_eal -Ilib/librte_kvargs -I../lib/librte_kvargs -Ilib/librte_metrics -I../lib/librte_metrics -Ilib/librte_telemetry -I../lib/librte_telemetry -Ilib/librte_pci -I../lib/librte_pci -Ilib/librte_vhost -I../lib/librte_vhost -Ilib/librte_ethdev -I../lib/librte_ethdev -Ilib/librte_net -I../lib/librte_net -Ilib/librte_mbuf -I../lib/librte_mbuf -Ilib/librte_mempool -I../lib/librte_mempool -Ilib/librte_ring -I../lib/librte_ring -Ilib/librte_meter -I../lib/librte_meter -Ilib/librte_cryptodev -I../lib/librte_cryptodev -Ilib/librte_hash -I../lib/librte_hash -fdiagnostics-color=always -pipe -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Werror -O3 -include rte_config.h -Wextra -Wcast-qual -Wdeprecated -Wformat-nonliteral -Wformat-security -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wpointer-arith -Wsign-compare -Wstrict-prototypes -Wundef -Wwrite-strings -Wno-address-of-packed-member -Wno-packed-not-aligned -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-zero-length-bounds -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -march=native -DALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_API -DALLOW_INTERNAL_API -Wno-format-truncation -MD -MQ drivers/libtmp_rte_pmd_ifc.a.p/vdpa_ifc_ifcvf_vdpa.c.o -MF drivers/libtmp_rte_pmd_ifc.a.p/vdpa_ifc_ifcvf_vdpa.c.o.d -o drivers/libtmp_rte_pmd_ifc.a.p/vdpa_ifc_ifcvf_vdpa.c.o -c ../drivers/vdpa/ifc/ifcvf_vdpa.c In file included from ../drivers/vdpa/ifc/ifcvf_vdpa.c:26: ../drivers/vdpa/ifc/base/ifcvf.h:16: error: "VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM" redefined [-Werror] 16 | #define VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM 33 | In file included from /usr/include/linux/virtio_net.h:30, from ../drivers/vdpa/ifc/ifcvf_vdpa.c:11: /usr/include/linux/virtio_config.h:78: note: this is the location of the previous definition 78 | #define VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM | cc1: all warnings being treated as errors Thanks guys. -- David Marchand