From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ci-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20876A04F9
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:16:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4571E9BD;
	Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:16:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com
 [207.211.31.81]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B501DB76
 for <ci@dpdk.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:16:08 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
 s=mimecast20190719; t=1578651368;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=RwyGPccNQBayBftaypN4G2fQRgwA06aU62g09hnUgc8=;
 b=H7CLbV4w+yj1304suwtZYjm1LLRrxg3vmLGZSsdi6hR38x92b3ydGhZ87+XH2kGzJOMdY1
 Vdgwyn/yB3ISZY4Fyx7pT0Ez2vXyFBJgbPkrcLqHiuXiI3+pgaW/pganz3HCNvH0QqvOc/
 K2OM/CDXD6eHkbV5KaJKwn4zGbSGK+g=
Received: from mail-ua1-f71.google.com (mail-ua1-f71.google.com
 [209.85.222.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-211-IIVN_reRMdqV_7V1EBAtFA-1; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 05:16:06 -0500
Received: by mail-ua1-f71.google.com with SMTP id o13so371583uad.7
 for <ci@dpdk.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 02:16:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=7JIC3y57Gc9jgdx7uluKoXwTxn2vll0rvfeXTxnoJKM=;
 b=pLthipQSLXnhlcTIn+MiHjVsj0KlTdKy9O4fWlrIp3cMk3cCAaIHBjJ9baLYwQLduF
 1BOtkFfSAdO6Y0+SadfRM3DamWQf9vMQN4d06Db01zE/he/3vm+KhdwR72gBrfWyyLYJ
 eF05mOgzcLWoCG6ne9cQqLgC/GFNeGxus3bZXAIE/7TaMlTr6akq9oKH0k2S7CUTJj3/
 I1omK0cx/s5r1Ucmqpd/erdKmK3g13NbC3q7eE4lb8E3pT1ksBdjp2L9R80ya5r5Dv3X
 j4uK/o6/85fIce66w/lFs4+m8nlXguDFyivS3GgKIxzFDBmsUgg/4meAyvZMMtG8lErY
 45sQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVpFy0pwbNlOQf6GHiw2fpyhG0aSdlDzt0j2ZHOtCPRuBkmEf6g
 Xq9rC571V/2HHED+1O72lWwy29U92sMYqQpufrG44uD16EiQ5jcOYnS5Ur1ohBj+8Wh3yz3bEk3
 OK4iRBZqH4GuDnq58KQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:488b:: with SMTP id x11mr1363921uac.86.1578651366080; 
 Fri, 10 Jan 2020 02:16:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwEsbx3H2zDBvzj9QTUT3Z0sVjri2FR4q3O823LLSTO34Iafd/nIk804DeC9CJ9PBbrZA0SV6RthWaRJUazLPs=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:488b:: with SMTP id x11mr1363908uac.86.1578651365756; 
 Fri, 10 Jan 2020 02:16:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:15:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8yEpnGaDNs7XFcZnqUmpNDssfGuWVqGE6_L3_jU6YKkbQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: ci@dpdk.org
Cc: "Zhang, XuemingX" <xuemingx.zhang@intel.com>, "Chen,
 Zhaoyan" <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>, Qian Xu <qian.q.xu@intel.com>
X-MC-Unique: IIVN_reRMdqV_7V1EBAtFA-1
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [dpdk-ci] Intel CI reports
X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK CI discussions <ci.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/ci>,
 <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/>
List-Post: <mailto:ci@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/ci>,
 <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "ci" <ci-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hello,

Looking at a Intel CI report, even if the overall reported status is
Success, we can notice that a FC30-64 target has a FAIL status.

Example:
http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-January/112739.html

| FC30-64        | FAIL |       |      |            |           |
     |          |


Thanks.


--=20
David Marchand