From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E767B48A46; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:18:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43BC40609; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:18:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D498C402EE for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:18:10 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1761902290; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vuDINOMLd3SQH6869xuhD/l/uoRup+frK/bePHjolu8=; b=G3AL/DdrnXpwRiMu/LSgdNAhjyV8JHwWdwFq1esepHgwcoHKFEkVKEG2JcnMFOguy0/Bu2 F7wKkPA4PBhoaD24TjQFjqpiKmBRD2V6kBosi67lakeltWzPuRwxpHJdlmUDbP+npMpxEv v51lPSZwo+CZO9u7NOSl74vHB8gELOA= Received: from mail-lj1-f199.google.com (mail-lj1-f199.google.com [209.85.208.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-691-QYNcAV7jN2eAcc-sj_u5uQ-1; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 05:18:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: QYNcAV7jN2eAcc-sj_u5uQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: QYNcAV7jN2eAcc-sj_u5uQ_1761902287 Received: by mail-lj1-f199.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-37773b4780cso10482181fa.3 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 02:18:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1761902287; x=1762507087; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vuDINOMLd3SQH6869xuhD/l/uoRup+frK/bePHjolu8=; b=HrG7jWj/RpJoAvrcof9rMuPK0jEoLsJWGXoSonUQgaaQhWPgHHvCvC1Wheuh7YerO3 hSGazFC43w4Z1ycO13iSY4J1yTWuwarDRG6pbBnDnauUSkoGGNPyboY2iIyzLhlOnDhp cK2xitYQ0smEx4jwNRJFDY32/0SEFRkqhmezBSrq36QPhGsK44TIB+vhZsExyx39eqQw t6IoK9eslhupqTP+mzkeqJRp+jZmfM0sF4Lh7whz5FTVwxT7ENDNwBmieUt2En387qnG phF+N6LIgLbtYjk9AeBdExIx9zo1NBFGEjSmuJmevENRuXiGBWwRc94GYkOSF4UbD/Ri 3F+A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUYy7nrKnaBctdw0lWUnk6ykPw1EIz5PcUMFUnCmQVhL8ZD3ZxAag0cw+n3N9dGVEz7+g==@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw+1j0QD3NmxitvJJJICvmlSNi9I8as5bYbXdN43wI5ht8+yl2Z gGx170AedcjwWB4CTynQ2/yavJTAzjg1wm5ftSqBohH+oPEaUE7lnqn6d1xegyGShh4hal5t7Aj ztp5KIbTo7a23ToIILFrKxDF/a4oMb3vqeZpDo1271lCK1TX2/Zd9fAxCxAWFlU1l+uLTCv+/mp CgpkbrgTrlGIpt2YRITA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctPPONDlaO3GwaF02oPzO2HFpWLk8Ux7j+6Gibt1WsDX+9cV2uzXltfb33WcmY LpPtWC0IuJhVMVIIA+Kr4SObTF00yiZO6xvtw9Pelps20XoSlAvq/qV0/0SBdOcabJ1ND7E6tQK M5BDx5fBL95oVFgF7mP5Xmc1vgh3rALOmMTEtYr6Yr+IT6Y2rZkLKiZCOfZQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a593:0:b0:376:4320:e34c with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-37a18df596dmr8493781fa.46.1761902287305; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 02:18:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IErUlXnsg6aFwEvS6PO4YUDn4CY4uRZ9OVRT+YLiKfzKkA9bjOOkGGDPa7SgSGvcJBD9bka3xJ2mHdlgzOj2aE= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a593:0:b0:376:4320:e34c with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-37a18df596dmr8493641fa.46.1761902286885; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 02:18:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35F6551F@smartserver.smartshare.dk> In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35F6551F@smartserver.smartshare.dk> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:17:55 +0100 X-Gm-Features: AWmQ_bkMH-oXKrDLNlyQOtl3iopKvlOZkbTZSLfmdZggeqtFqfy3QOBDy2qrVcY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Disable SPDK testing again? To: =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=C3=B8rup?= Cc: Patrick Robb , Aaron Conole , dpdk-techboard , bruce.richardson@intel.com, ci@dpdk.org, dev X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: DAam8Kjj78U6zQywtL5jOTRbo3qEwab9AUjg6b_334w_1761902287 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 at 10:11, Morten Br=C3=B8rup = wrote: > While it is just a warning in the CI dashboard, I don't think we > > should waste resources on this testing. > > Opinions? > > We should ask ourselves why they are doing that. > Is something wrong (or incomplete) with our handling of -Denable_libs? > Are we including unnecessary optional libs? > > It seems like they are using -Ddisable_libs, not -Denable_libs. Don't the= y know about -Denable_libs? I reached out to some SPDK dev when I was working on enable_libs. I also Cc: one of them on the patches but never got a reply. --=20 David Marchand