DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	 ci@dpdk.org, Michael Santana <msantana@redhat.com>,
	Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>,
	dpdklab <dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [RFC] Proposal for allowing rerun of tests
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:56:58 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8z0=jMQrTuKg2-q5+bWKErPDc4XLAfETP8a1e-vuPB7-A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7t5z0fr884.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com>

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 5:03 PM Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> > > First question: WHO should be allowed to ask for a re-run?
> >> > >         - everybody
> >> > >         - patchwork delegate
> >> >
> >> > Patchwork delegate requires to maintain a map between pw logins and an
> >> > actual mail address (if we go with email for the second point).
> >> >
> >> > >         - a list of maintainers
> >> >
> >> > I'd vote on any maintainer from MAINTAINERS, _but_ it must be from the
> >> > files in the repo, not in the series being tested.
> >> > So maybe the easier is to have an explicit list... ?
>
> I agree with using the MAINTAINERS file from the repo.
>
> >> >
> >> > - author
> >> > Just listing this option for discussion, but this is dangerous, as any
> >> > user could then call reruns.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I would tend towards including this, on the basis that any author can
> >> already get a re-run just be resubmitting a new version of their patchset.
> >> This just simplifies that for all concerned.
> >
> > I agree, and it would be very convenient for authors hitting
> > a strange failure: they can double check without bothering maintainers.
>
> +1

Ok for me.


-- 
David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-27  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-13 13:50 [dpdk-ci] " Aaron Conole
2021-04-13 14:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-13 14:59   ` David Marchand
2021-04-13 15:04     ` [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] " Bruce Richardson
2021-04-13 15:17       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-21 15:02         ` Aaron Conole
2021-04-27  8:56           ` David Marchand [this message]
2022-01-21 14:00 ` [dpdk-ci] " Kevin Traynor
2022-01-21 17:57   ` [dpdklab] " Lincoln Lavoie
2022-01-25 13:05     ` Kevin Traynor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJFAV8z0=jMQrTuKg2-q5+bWKErPDc4XLAfETP8a1e-vuPB7-A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dpdklab@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=msantana@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK CI discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci/0 ci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ci ci/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/ci \
		ci@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index ci

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.ci


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git