From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34DDBA0565 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:33:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8331C028; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:33:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7738C1C012 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:33:04 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1583832784; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mrwq5D2q9gcO4WM2JYTWxwsNFA0Jb7yaDRc48CvW0FM=; b=fDO6KaWzlXp0IdSCK5kHVtSqRx62LxMsPbVYOePrJu56ZLTHwjApvPYEtLVUnzScLCXCdY EjmCclyUGBw4rvR4fdFvMbYzHdyEOmRDnBg0K129zY1XTnwcCSDqiWu6gyXp/TIY0x7e/j sgJ53Ij8oWPNsGZqeFBc73vQI+zkBms= Received: from mail-vs1-f70.google.com (mail-vs1-f70.google.com [209.85.217.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-362-U3FOwCULOkKZloP4G9f7ig-1; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 05:32:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: U3FOwCULOkKZloP4G9f7ig-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f70.google.com with SMTP id u5so644185vsg.21 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 02:32:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=weEaRxhut0BhSI74aFAUd/B0RtZAyJDwwMwHo6Y0+s4=; b=MN0yvWn2rYRo6CwxhQG27Aer6CPub9M/wu5kpJz8SgqbcLHG4qdvSPNf2lUSZQQcE3 eFmqj98qooOfqgd5I/v/UgHjx4GP4eVWQcqBVLrEeBoTzJH3nd0RlQRkyQbZF9XYMXf8 p7mFxgSwvgTRfGx5lBGctnMywfiyU6NSy72NNTTo9lmz02ytEyMB+tcaj8nh2FIOrZ9v vrPLgeoBDTw96mq9cUtslKw0GWp26Yk9AbUbPl6mB7pu7pUfhTXtFGo6K/vi2EbIxOjR orNvFBmosKb9XLSCo2q/RTHtKZLZE1luGuhBsaNkGH6E1DGDDSgUNhdvd/0xti6I55RB AkPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0LRHT/LfijDYwKFsqWSCI6VIAkeRAL7BWdgj3YioGemQJg/VXk 7CQvpXD58aWQclq9Jw5ldtSB7y+07ADcDWZ0T5gE9uH3VOctie3VdMOiMPScIHCtQvnalTK36Vn n7ihuHolBhJoeiiCsIQ== X-Received: by 2002:a9f:2204:: with SMTP id 4mr4894232uad.87.1583832765452; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 02:32:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsa5DlgDOuI7TgOjf39sZgRSVP+F0XlslsKn0SZUstCM4wlDnE1SiQuVsdUnTYfHxE3buN9IdN7z31FONOnp/I= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:2204:: with SMTP id 4mr4894214uad.87.1583832765077; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 02:32:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1827408.xz2uEaWSZ7@xps> <9DEEADBC57E43F4DA73B571777FECECA41EAB066@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <9DEEADBC57E43F4DA73B571777FECECA41EBB4AF@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:32:34 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Chen, Zhaoyan" Cc: dpdklab@iol.unh.edu, Lincoln Lavoie , Thomas Monjalon , "ci@dpdk.org" , "Tu, Lijuan" , "Xu, Qian Q" , Brandon Lo X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: Intel performance test is failing X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 3:14 PM Brandon Lo wrote: > > Hi David and Zhaoyan, > > > Yes, those results are related to the Intel machine; I have disabled test= ing for the Intel testbed. > > The 82599ES machine is now available for ssh and modifications. Any news about this? I received a failure on a patch of mine (changing macros in a ARM header). https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9900/ But this time, it is with the 40G Intel nic test. --=20 David Marchand