From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEFAA052A for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 15:49:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51CBF72; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 15:49:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1A3F3E for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 15:49:36 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1579531776; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ouso34GxuANuW9HOkK9dFqE3frnE4R132kKSDfLfq0M=; b=RxxLEyMNPrYnL8GDw+IbSQKTt8Pfp8+zR+5zalJ32I9C2wCKpZ1lhdJbQTeSH4KutebJYs wogw0x9908JnxNBHHCy78KCmnTqaEQ/cY5yHG3H2zq0StfEFDfsGYEOQy3Q2iSOUHsPafM ZgYYw1TJXOlciXd2qXOD28BKI7ptACM= Received: from mail-vk1-f198.google.com (mail-vk1-f198.google.com [209.85.221.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-336-MBwj9vgFPpWxQD6PVmntqQ-1; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:49:34 -0500 Received: by mail-vk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id b68so13013765vkh.21 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:49:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=x+F7u/p6SH7IbLmfBNv+RBX4NnhEE01gmNgKYA3PzBA=; b=r4e3QO4gnCejq0u0Kyu4AQgAs0Eh8QSZQVnchbHQSudGUNPGdtL3ovkpSmsY5r8Q1u wrD+L+bJjVqenp7m1/LOiqrE/q0CK92qWIdHciQsk3OjD5Oe93UoazmR02MB6vMgVmXZ h9sjWF0Lkpg13+MaaWCqFWRvL1exklfkzWApw53vqkDHZfAD0B5rvhswMkrR8cwq8Hb2 Mpip+ISLF1gr6FfQ5BYhCxWDd+W5Wji0dGaG4x5kHSdDO209kcnWIOAoMxFQZzj4y5CX U8nx999o2LGt54f5xFBgBpjRVW9VXJxB9gcHXqUDzLw74EPgmAAFNkDRKwfjq7bVfn+S rE0w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVbNtZuoN6mRzDYFAz4eBLvXvfb40Z56x2pHEnzoSSNrsSWJwTG szYeIMlstxTOIJIDowS2W8+sKInVOACguDyA+bJIYJEs9NTvCfGH7O9tPDYjroysKsnhhWc3e6m Q8S2P+0KenErRB0zamg== X-Received: by 2002:a67:b303:: with SMTP id a3mr12090761vsm.141.1579531773922; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:49:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzDe7FR0SBrWjaN45HdOpcdabjPSAqjPs00jfL/r04rVnMfd/kFTmXWVWSTybHzsUsY7qh5pNbHPbCclCY3vGE= X-Received: by 2002:a67:b303:: with SMTP id a3mr12090730vsm.141.1579531773653; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:49:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9DEEADBC57E43F4DA73B571777FECECA41E9E23A@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <2347250.TLnPLrj5Ze@xps> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 15:49:22 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Zhang, XuemingX" Cc: "viacheslavo@mellanox.com" , "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , "jackmin@mellanox.com" , "huwei013@chinasoftinc.com" , "dekelp@mellanox.com" , "Iremonger, Bernard" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "Xu, Qian Q" , "Mcnamara, John" , "Yu, PingX" , Ali Alnubani , Thomas Monjalon , "Chen, Zhaoyan" , "ci@dpdk.org" X-MC-Unique: MBwj9vgFPpWxQD6PVmntqQ-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000047c919059c9366a5" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Master compilation failures in Intel CI X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" --00000000000047c919059c9366a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 7:06 AM Zhang, XuemingX wrote: > >Can you give me a list of patchsets you think are problematic so > > >that I can test them? > > > > Filter some recent patch sets and list problematic patchsets. > > > > In the table below, which branch does it make more sense to apply the > patchsets? Old_guess_tree or new_guess_tree or next-**? > > Please fill in the form guess_tree column. > Please, don't use html for a simple list. > > serite_id > > old_guess_tree > > new_guess_tree > > serite_url > > Author > > guess_tree > > 8174 > > dpdk-next-net-mlx > > dpdk > > *http://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/series/8174 > * > > Viacheslav Ovsiienko > > > > 8158 > > dpdk-next-crypto > > dpdk > > *http://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/series/8158 > * > > Pablo de Lara > > > > 8154 > > dpdk-next-net > > dpdk > > *http://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/series/8154 > * > > Xiaoyu Min > > > > 8153 > > dpdk-next-net > > dpdk > > *http://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/series/8153 > * > > Wei Hu (Xavier) > > > > 8177 > > dpdk-next-net-mlx > > dpdk > > *http://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/series/8177 > * > > Dekel Peled > > > > 8162 > > dpdk-next-net > > dpdk > > *http://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/series/8162 > * > > Bernard Iremonger > > > > 8169 > > dpdk-next-net-intel > > dpdk > > *http://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/series/8169 > * > > Bernard Iremonger > > > > > I am ok with reverting the change on the script, but, once done some fixes are needed in MAINTAINERS: - 8174 should go to the main repository, since there are mbuf changes, but mbuf is not marked to go to the main repository, to be fixed, - 8158 touches a devtools/ script, but I suppose Thomsa and I will see this kind of change, we can leave it in MAINTAINERS as it is, - 8154 is ok as it is, - 8153 is ok as it is, - 8177 is ok too, - 8162 and others from Bernard are not a proper series, must be resent as a series, but I can see Ferruh already took it, --=20 David Marchand > --00000000000047c919059c9366a5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 7:06 AM Zhang= , XuemingX <xuemingx.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
>Can you give me a list of patchsets you think are problematic so

>that I can test them?

=C2=A0

Filter some r= ecent patch sets and list problematic patchsets.=C2=A0

=C2=A0=

In the table = below, which branch does it make more sense to apply the patchsets? Old_gue= ss_tree or new_guess_tree or next-**?

Please fill i= n the form guess_tree column.


<= /div>
Please, don't use html for a simple list.

<= /u>

=C2=A0

serite_id<= /span>

old_guess_tree=

new_guess_tree=

serite_url=

Author

guess_tree=

8174

dpdk-next-net-mlx=

dpdk

http://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/series/8174=

Viacheslav Ovsiienko<= /u>

=C2=A0

8158

dpdk-next-crypto<= u>

dpdk

http://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/series/8158=

Pablo de Lara<= /u>

=C2=A0

8154

dpdk-next-net<= /u>

dpdk

http://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/series/8154=

Xiaoyu Min=

=C2=A0

8153

dpdk-next-net<= /u>

dpdk

http://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/series/8153=

Wei Hu (Xavier)

=C2=A0

8177

dpdk-next-net-mlx=

dpdk

http://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/series/8177=

Dekel Peled

=C2=A0

8162

dpdk-next-net<= /u>

dpdk

http://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/series/8162=

Bernard Iremonger=

=C2=A0

8169

dpdk-next-net-intel

dpdk

http://patchwork.dpdk.org/api/series/8169=

Bernard Iremonger=

=C2=A0

=C2=A0


I am ok wi= th reverting the change on the script, but, once done some fixes are needed= in MAINTAINERS:

- 8174 should go to the main = repository, since there are mbuf changes, but mbuf is not marked to go to t= he main repository, to be fixed,
- 8158 touches a devtools/ s= cript, but I suppose Thomsa and I will see this kind of change, we can leav= e it in MAINTAINERS as it is,
- 8154 is ok as it is,
- 8153 is ok as it is,
- 8177 is ok too,
- 81= 62 and others from Bernard are not a proper series, must be resent as a ser= ies, but I can see Ferruh already took it,


--
David Marchand
--00000000000047c919059c9366a5--