From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606DEA04DD for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:36:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FD1C8DA; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:36:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F7DC8D8 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:36:27 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1605724585; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YY7LYxY3XVYqXNoj69Wk7d7pq/yZh6br+ZQeM2iEGz8=; b=agjhoomGip5a0ZxB427gW2hA6sjkG+ooZoGpVgEpv2XtzUjkCcdG7+PWbHU4hOyNJuBo51 73ArLBeAypVF/+OFiw5rbILmZyDVJK4p4iS2JB6a+YDQoa89xv7pDM6OI2VWYgkJlmwQA5 Sb+8san+apHcan3yhQkF0j62wxI/iHI= Received: from mail-vk1-f199.google.com (mail-vk1-f199.google.com [209.85.221.199]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-122-DCeGee_vNhebdN6vCZik4A-1; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:36:22 -0500 X-MC-Unique: DCeGee_vNhebdN6vCZik4A-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id 126so1112920vku.14 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:36:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YY7LYxY3XVYqXNoj69Wk7d7pq/yZh6br+ZQeM2iEGz8=; b=c6btTY1YZVKpxgT6mJtmhmhkiUuUY8dxqqw9xx1mgsbjxPjQHpf0SL1/vkli+G4mb7 3jYaUbtGVhWSTzsv0GtNO9qOu9u7zr9HNFSBm2JfPMnqZUd1NMDngKdKaUH+lL9ShYBW ni9RIqVsWhtIawwHXLZt/lPY2BN/oDKK3UuYD7ScG8I2K1LvuVy/LTYyOBafDj6ICary zfmnnnP5u4enyLBfI1jHSkGYCw3chefaXoS+N5P1r+DFg64/omMjPZCUM1u1DMIS6Vtj UsDJ38183GMCHOYXZymaoM/WrDkqz7gDWtasMMIKjoGLuP0/37pctoczzQfkFkT6VYV7 b5qA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oZWDkM2lIqF9V4BmXOJjimsCfBYsp+O3krWTubXgrFzsOKtID FoiKOgtyaNJfcaShdEinjvINOfY+/D0f5hweuACVDdIK8wj0SkdsZsh3WuBnoAWBE3C7qfe/pt9 EQnhuKPrL6jka7JnyVw== X-Received: by 2002:ab0:380d:: with SMTP id x13mr5255498uav.41.1605724581630; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:36:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzawFF2GdT/CtNqU/Z/PZxEdfcyLmZmtGj2rl9HdkW0noVTiGTn6vg2FgM6xKmRsHUU90uH52ulgWkLMd3n6Fs= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:380d:: with SMTP id x13mr5255479uav.41.1605724581479; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:36:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:36:10 +0100 Message-ID: To: Brandon Lo Cc: Lincoln Lavoie , "Zawadzki, Tomasz" , dpdklab , Thomas Monjalon , "ci@dpdk.org" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: SPDK compilation issue X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 7:26 PM David Marchand wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 4:57 PM Brandon Lo wrote: > > The SPDK compile job pulls from the LTS branch before every SPDK compile test. > > I have checked the local repository and it currently shows that it did pick up the commit 'a73286870ebf189629937515bd28714937f2498b: env_dpdk/pci: adapt to 20.11 EAL changes' > > > > Looking at the logs, I can see the changes have taken place. However, the error/warning messages are the same, and they highlight the lines that have already been changed. > > This issue persists after clearing the cache and rebuilding the container used to compile. Has anyone had an issue like this before? > > > > Do you mean that this job in a container is compiling the SPDK sources > before my change, or with my change? Ok, this is my fault. I just don't understand how it passed my test... so I'll have to double check my setup when compiling SPDK. And I'll submit an additional fix to SPDK tomorrow. -- David Marchand