From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9ABA034F for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:30:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B1C40E3C; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:30:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087B040DDA for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:30:21 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1633678221; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iVuUQjzvvlqLcwfMQ5snON2iSQSPTT2oekf2DQArhYk=; b=Xe5VS/jdTKNC9kvzqwKckUs2QtzHuDXvdGxKxWg4S2A1xn6ZhRyD0miGwp63Nsmttnvjhp FliWogCO4DOvxKTyFKE83OITWy4pWMB9yEdNsuXzetRdgde9445pPjB4omF4x5XMWz9rPi 4IJG9Vf5bIB3CKwY5m9Yjhc8TNFRkQU= Received: from mail-lf1-f72.google.com (mail-lf1-f72.google.com [209.85.167.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-117-n4iQofSNNDyxWEji6VZCHw-1; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 03:30:18 -0400 X-MC-Unique: n4iQofSNNDyxWEji6VZCHw-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f72.google.com with SMTP id c6-20020a05651200c600b003fc6d39efa4so6429518lfp.12 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:30:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iVuUQjzvvlqLcwfMQ5snON2iSQSPTT2oekf2DQArhYk=; b=izclYgj1xIkFuXfZSOBmY9OhFhg7OUaTkqOPR5OkEUhwLYe9BOfFnOWFDGxlSZgicq G16myyBkRAK91CM/b/KT1Pzl6DV+LxmYKOuqGhmFzjyGYlbHtWseyasH8ic4hsUoPL9H 7QAqRdjM4TeKtT8fh1N9F09K6oac1hkqMuIZ1RUOI57PcalgnAdaEyev/8usfTAiZk0q 3vLXrvXK8zS3BgknaCEpdJdRPKXfBAHSb/SC0hMBcUH0JScPdJzbeqCvVng7sgrOX/tr ONUssPjQvANqdJguMaH2gqvkG+icrA/fMH5UhoOMIoNv7S0SctC0OldLGvpsXOouxqDl d6Dg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532BS/YsM8R6hwMV6CeeeMPrnRMHMyL9SswXVvip8T9ygCxB6Cl0 B8XOC/buaTh1txvnpjkiQiZiNMHbpmu7sfYGSRLVGrTfl9g+UZ6uaTFZ0XRs0RYyxoR2PxTndW0 JcNH5asP00J20doJ+LA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2f02:: with SMTP id v2mr1844656ljv.46.1633678216853; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:30:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwH/f27i2zpz7MVW0RXtJ7Xf3g5jfHU1pDlEYFhEriytHek3jV1TFZ0UUEolyl8A7cldcbQ4ruUSIZnjo6tWNI= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2f02:: with SMTP id v2mr1844634ljv.46.1633678216560; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:30:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:30:05 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Chen, Zhaoyan" , Lincoln Lavoie , Ali Alnubani , Aaron Conole , ci@dpdk.org Cc: dev , Thomas Monjalon , "Yigit, Ferruh" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Should we keep autotest.py ? X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 3:08 PM David Marchand wrote: > > Looking at how to add an autotest, I came upon autotest_data.py used > by autotest.py which has been in DPDK for a long time. > > From what I see, DTS directly calls the test binary. > The public CI relies on meson to invoke unit tests. > > Is the autotest.py script still used in some CI or can we remove it? Looking back in history, we lost ability to call this script with make removal. So I'd say we are fine with dropping it. See 3cc6ecfdfe85 ("build: remove makefiles") Going once. -- David Marchand