From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7B1A052A for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:44:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919CD140D01; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:44:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473EC140D00 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:44:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1611567859; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jajd0gXONIaDsKQFFuNJB0uyOVnmRVaLE61U+3n8JvM=; b=Q3J1itfP/vROnSZ0Iw8AqFzuYks9h+3DYuMpCd5E3Lbo7ufOgPtGuuvx3mJqY2/FNWobXr 8iulcXF2lQ/3mybWwX/XcU3o75goIkkxrIt+KrT5LFMwlZEnMxEMVXX3Mv/DaEzj4yVzNj 5jiX106snv/o9Q/WMUZFkQbfE1FZ8v4= Received: from mail-ua1-f71.google.com (mail-ua1-f71.google.com [209.85.222.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-543-FCdqlPPzOEuGMTrdqIQTkw-1; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 04:44:16 -0500 X-MC-Unique: FCdqlPPzOEuGMTrdqIQTkw-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f71.google.com with SMTP id c2so4989982uak.12 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 01:44:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jajd0gXONIaDsKQFFuNJB0uyOVnmRVaLE61U+3n8JvM=; b=RZu19ZDcRlc4gF1mW4x2V8cpWcx6RnXi0LOp4+0hOLvLvbN5xjjAq4xPDRY7JZ2kCX WIoynOJBYv/Z1w+fMGtYNiubJmeB7kxkTis6jxECrhDtrIFFiDtmNGhskrolQ5E0uTPw lI2UUl57BQf9gvH2UApVgTn4lSM9esBi9of1YhqlNotK70N/AX5oe+leIYPT8VsEeKoR U3nTyI8k6fSxzwstaZS6W5znzdLP9UmJ8rJe82p0M2yTSciPeOkNRPmkjdwWf1/H+hUl yzxcmzSrufydXhGjw2CqhX6CRPVdkvnHnTIE9VGdW2mQ8iC1g54die0jORfqZAz0jns1 ulPw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532QomYvJyrCv9uQDWmJcGJOyR55pvurlJII/b6AOMYbZTYVU6vp WHy+94zg9aSVF4FE8jJc786Fv3jLge0NRFHXSCXkyauLm70U04G0QdFxjXqBpFMNZt2ujFMgaSy y/sNA3hxvt7TdzTWvqA== X-Received: by 2002:a9f:2628:: with SMTP id 37mr215780uag.87.1611567856423; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 01:44:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/eGACBM3cM46URD0ACOgEcJ4L28Flpyh0UFAjQqb6mZU9l2Wp9NV+YnPKXnrlK1QML2qfpm8pwH005NnKpa4= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:2628:: with SMTP id 37mr215766uag.87.1611567856236; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 01:44:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:44:04 +0100 Message-ID: To: Honnappa Nagarahalli , "aconole@redhat.com" , Thomas Monjalon , "Yigit, Ferruh" Cc: Ruifeng Wang , "ci@dpdk.org" , nd Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] query about Travis CI running status X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Hello, On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:18 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:28 AM Ruifeng Wang > > > wrote: > > > > Can you tell whether Travis CI is still running or have been disabl= ed? > > > > > > > > It seems there is no Travis build since Dec 16, 2020. > > > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds > > > > > > > > I think now DPDK can use Travis CI as usual as a result of Arm=E2= =80=99s > > > communication with Travis. > > > > DPDK should be on a whitelist and free from credit issue. > > > > > > Can you share details on this? > > > Do you mean the main DPDK/dpdk repo gets free credits? > It is the main repo: https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk I re-enabled a weekly build in the cron settings and set the "build on push" option for the main repository DPDK/dpdk. Travis started one build for the weekly schedule, which got cancelled with "Owner DPDK does not have enough credits.". I then merged a simple fix in the main repo, Travis triggered a job which got cancelled with the same message. So I disabled all of Travis jobs again for DPDK/dpdk (no weekly build, no build on push). > > > Or the ovsrobot/DPDK? or both? > This was not requested. Which one do we need? I'd like to hear about others but for me, ovsrobot/dpdk is the more important (and the more credits-hungry btw). DPDK/dpdk is a bonus. > > > What of other individual's forks? > I have not discussed this. > Is this required? May be at least for the maintainers? I wanted to know what had been discussed/agreed with Travis. This is not required, but nice for contributors. > > > > > Sorry I don't know how the whitelist works in detail. Need to check and= get > > back. > > Just wanted to know if Travis CI had chance to run. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just want to know if it works as expected. > > > > > > From the webui, I still see a complaint on missing credits for > > > DPDK/dpdk and ovsrobot/dpdk, but I can't tell if this warning is link= ed to my > > account. > Can you please provide a link to this? You can see here: https://travis-ci.com/github/DPDK/dpdk/requests https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/requests -- David Marchand