From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135244550C; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:04:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E50F40E2C; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:04:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ot1-f44.google.com (mail-ot1-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0034A40E2A for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:04:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ot1-f44.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-700cf7e2779so1474779a34.1 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 10:04:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1719507866; x=1720112666; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Mk5oOmzTscfVxczEpMvPjw16tCOp8xtgYvjscETyYRc=; b=jB8T+97dutsBgWuNqbnztHMmwna1vi+WZWC+Mti1RY+FD/sDVaMCGaZ7Tv+jrfKDqb MUI300CcqqWxfFPYHowL5FoigVmSqy4ISYiqLZFvzNOKtqzgy2C6G5ZJGJ3ffZkpnfSB s4B9xa2XUwG57PJM86EYrKYvtT/c0xeG4GXHw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719507866; x=1720112666; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Mk5oOmzTscfVxczEpMvPjw16tCOp8xtgYvjscETyYRc=; b=ArySiWf2hjLh8rP5pqYEvEAGTWZZPkV+75JX4Vvf3Bo3FRiN2vPc2+COghsLWBB7/t AcO0K3hBvNey4FetJD1ioMkznATPthoQUYat4GNLwMWoWwbzqyCQlvtIHmlBxMOV95Oa IZDMBVqR0mBZ6ubFf0MZ0Z/nBv0zmB2tN6kYlDFamh3g8DFOH9EzWyWykJUI9FlFywjw rwxtDNYOpX6L8a6kBHaj0SQ6Czjw8M1fqsuQzJ52GKxbyknC0vq2kFV0Fb6SQEL95Dt9 YknfZyWcvZdO7BAY736M0GG86gGKOMdfsCOgZWRJMEL4fl4CI07spoTNd3gll/nM/w30 aLog== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUTWRYSYQGyClyqfQ6rgqRPWW7jc+Gd1yHGdDCH3Y3Pa/9qRmphfV80s/m5p2DEtfZ2zWQNdIgzLdBxFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YypRr35gdtJigepI+/cyMbB0wkYiIsKSh1CEZxHLIUnbJJ6Kzru +rrUGZ09mP+ILixfKjVmfH2c/uOQNNQECoDSseeTwpQH52J1mYOaN9C6TfL56/hq83PLrzsEu2c xAfs7vAjEFBwWWmFJHKbM8ALSUEY9mRfloeZLzQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEoKOYiHYlEjqIhMWJuarXvRSmDnPW2sU4xoiMgNsvfoe52c8/1xK+XRkBWpz7waz1520dYIT2DhZw0aoRodI8= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:76d1:0:b0:6f9:75c9:854c with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-700b1271e04mr14375469a34.27.1719507865902; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 10:04:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240517192222.20555-2-probb@iol.unh.edu> <20240523215945.16468-1-probb@iol.unh.edu> In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:04:14 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools: check for pending test status when parsing emails To: Ali Alnubani Cc: Adam Hassick , Aaron Conole , "ci@dpdk.org" , "NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20240627075755.66386-1-sthott= on@marvell.com/ Thanks Ali. I see pending for this patch for ABI testing. We will look in a couple of hours and it should by then have updated to pass/fail. Assuming that we don't notice any weird behavior, we will merge our PR tomorrow morning for the remaining PW contexts we report (currently we still only have ABI pending enabled). One thing we didn't think about when we set this up was the "S/W/F" counter that can be seen from https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/. That does not include pending. I guess that will be something to discuss at our next CI meeting! Thanks. On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 12:48=E2=80=AFPM Ali Alnubani = wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adam Hassick > > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 10:32 PM > > To: Patrick Robb > > Cc: Aaron Conole ; ci@dpdk.org; NBU-Contact-Thomas > > Monjalon (EXTERNAL) ; Ali Alnubani > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools: check for pending test status when parsi= ng emails > > > > Ali, > > > > I've been monitoring Patchwork today after rolling out the feature on > > just the ABI context, and I've noticed that checks with "pending" > > status do not appear in the table or in the Patchwork API. I only see > > the check appear in the table/API once the final "success" check is > > sent. > > > > Here's a thread that I've been tracking for example: > > http://inbox.dpdk.org/test- > > report/667c6064.050a0220.f0848.4472SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.c > > om/T/#u > > It looks to me that the "Test-Status" tag is set correctly. > > > > Is it possible there are errors when adding the checks on the Patchwork= end? > > > > Hi Adam, > > I just realized that I pulled the new change in the wrong path. Can you p= lease try now? > > Thanks, > Ali