From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663EC42DEC; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 19:50:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BD541101; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 19:50:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oi1-f169.google.com (mail-oi1-f169.google.com [209.85.167.169]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A529940A79 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2023 19:50:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi1-f169.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3a36b52b4a4so599705b6e.1 for ; Thu, 06 Jul 2023 10:50:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1688665830; x=1691257830; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hYHfgYYZ7G5luqCFYwxayi3ngKxk92oPqnt0c45yAQI=; b=PXw2knCTHIJGh/ITybBM9E61P/U780rSBUXvxODJcgvrQ/40fFD9WyT7dL72kpe3LR IYNfukq60HTMNz35kcCZmEhcJyWJxDk3IzVSVlq6rPfPSHH2mpwi2yReRIV6wSmojCJp jZjf3AvAsWW4r1oXwA8rPzjcp2tKdsqwFtw24= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1688665830; x=1691257830; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hYHfgYYZ7G5luqCFYwxayi3ngKxk92oPqnt0c45yAQI=; b=g39Sfs7ZNMPIEr9z229OpA3uK5V1u16DhudByO4qfB/uO/JHH9/BvbqvpS7ohpsxP8 vIK3Rn9Rc2msWL52ReF++ixdgAJ6PzsraP/lVXIDlI7mgvIOBOwIEwJd0tSZebdD2zyu M8cB776ETHpKV+9LrT6Ti6e8/twXLxq4uwASvzgst/hyXnN7AVOQ8lKO8Q+aIeqOeTwz 9hW1Ws+uEEiULfGWewedEeu+L21XcyBFD99zzffcdtrSbZeTHoDaXwM/auHUliRTepSB 8AjrTdjaMgD8QX5DZrPJT5tiWLx8HSGpN9uD0f7nEzFY10wbj2FwCq15h84LH2M3xVqX NYXw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLaegUfwcOgHX3HfryDVcbWQe8OzG5QmGGHBTiYA0y23i4FyEk+E xb5LEghRAGWLfjO4KHgeNkgM7iN4Fcb/ge+tW9PizIh2o1XTOzLWp7w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlE1l2h8YFsSWccMvtO/fSQgkG/eIWXzoBLhq1/mtWh55sOk39l4URN3NzRmlQY77O5UZmGkFLKNK9MlxpqYYGE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1526:b0:39c:bfd0:76cb with SMTP id u38-20020a056808152600b0039cbfd076cbmr3272488oiw.9.1688665830663; Thu, 06 Jul 2023 10:50:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Patrick Robb Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 13:50:20 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Failing kernel module tests and test frequency question To: ci@dpdk.org Cc: David Marchand , Ferruh Yigit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fb3d9205ffd526d6" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000fb3d9205ffd526d6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, I am seeing our kmods testcase fail on the daily periodic run since June 29: https://dpdkdashboard.iol.unh.edu/results/dashboard/tarballs/25226/ It does coincide with a slew of patches being merged for rc2. But, I haven't looked at those patches individually, and I also don't know whether we generally expect breakages for this kernel module compile job to come from dpdk patches or from patches on the linux kernel project. I understand that the original/current plan was for running the kernel module test 1x/day. The question this raises for me is, if we were able to afford expending the needed compute resources for kmod compile testing on all incoming patchseries, would that be a valuable addition, or not? Thanks, Patrick -- Patrick Robb Technical Service Manager UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 www.iol.unh.edu --000000000000fb3d9205ffd526d6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,

I am seeing our kmods testcase f= ail on the daily periodic run since June 29:=C2=A0https://dpdkdashboar= d.iol.unh.edu/results/dashboard/tarballs/25226/

It does coincide with a slew of patches being merged for rc2. But, I have= n't looked at those patches individually, and I also don't know whe= ther we generally expect breakages for this kernel module compile job to co= me from dpdk patches or from patches on the linux kernel project.

I understand that the original/current plan was for running= the kernel module test 1x/day. The question this raises for me is, if we w= ere able to afford expending the needed compute resources for kmod compile = testing on all incoming patchseries, would that be a valuable addition, or = not?=C2=A0

Thanks,
Patrick
--
<= p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.2;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt">Patrick Robb

Technical Service Manager

UNH InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbu= ry Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

www.iol= .unh.edu


--000000000000fb3d9205ffd526d6--