From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7157046101; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 20:49:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618A7402DB; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 20:49:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pj1-f45.google.com (mail-pj1-f45.google.com [209.85.216.45]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6BD40261 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 20:49:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pj1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2efe25558ddso1958236a91.2 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 11:49:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1737661768; x=1738266568; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hbPoNHWCFrxgews/Dinv5aUP8D24f1iHryO2L3imb+M=; b=XOJ09o9QSqSiQbY2L6MRtB5jeUSaTsf5xI8I3/dQBU+LGGQrCpeIFWLKJFTXROp5Dd 48AaPXPkoo5CystPeMSi5NQ88KwUwhYulqCm1DEmOSMHBzX86Zwsq6EzWhJB93zhqqki 7l0fyILKGcSasTnIxw/5YaAnAMNNqVemj5zE8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737661768; x=1738266568; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hbPoNHWCFrxgews/Dinv5aUP8D24f1iHryO2L3imb+M=; b=oEFQfSdD2Sd2baabajXHjzpxL68nfVghXiUpTYnlXA9FVQNiVfvTiv1JO8d6ilpj/m brCanpMByFr1UFMSgS8MKnYy1Wct4qUqkn1DVdeU66uKmmhR/ULH4VsfCb3iBocTBqE4 n3aeI+/7JpBqKwqbEQ4lRcKM90yfbx75fRe+2yxIoLh0QAl3v2TS9p3xylSDNG3Zfzde lv3ByCJZ9V34YK7S3joC4V4aQy5fCi/A0Cl2aLO8F/EdEwb10mzT769IAPZPl9MOsAu5 UMWRp4eaNFzcRqlzXWr4lfiCCer4cpIQqbE84tQzQVrzg34qaG5N4/jZ1nG7190aavRh VJ3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywbll2Pt4V+pH4udL3VZVxQl4H28yt5gDQBJDC54M8K19M2JX6B MGBtQb1g22I6rNE1aU36kknBH3UYgwweNvM4nFYdKsUsyeZ0RHjS39o6bRZdkM1Hrf90/yDgpvz X+W0uJUrP/pO9RdgnNx2v5D5cnbj7FoB/ggUafQ== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuZ5KJlH9y5vDY7aeq+Lig84OAhtVbCgCnyivLUJDUczIu3L3YhD4ioUPl30FA g+hS55GZALvMjUFSSqa5LkfDpbuFXt6s2GMkZP9vD6BP9WP4c9fFtQtiBhpR9+GqT7PUge0zPI2 S/kqVwfqEtUsLCse80Jvw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHmJLsBn87L9ZdNfrlDAh7Llu5y+NqzGWp20cmNECuglM/V2y9dRn9g6CBGpqpH0mfFvAAPeeGflHTmHljfsJY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c883:b0:2ee:7698:e565 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f782c6fdcamr38818140a91.8.1737661768010; Thu, 23 Jan 2025 11:49:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Patrick Robb Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:46:31 -0500 X-Gm-Features: AbW1kvb8LK3Egi1u3I5NsHbKJ3xEFn6kRgm9TnbUi8_vLWUi3hEo5kY-wR8ijG0 Message-ID: Subject: Windows compile and unit test jobs To: Andre Muezerie Cc: ci@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006c24d0062c64e874" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org --0000000000006c24d0062c64e874 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello Andre, Thank you for joining the CI call this morning and for raising the topic of Windows compile and unit tests at the UNH lab. I have confirmed we are publishing build results for the 3 compile toolchain options described on dpdk.org these are: llvm-clang native compile mingw64 native compile msvc native compile Here is an example of a compile report including these. https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2025-January/845150.html Some notes about the compile options: -I have now renamed the clang test from dpdk_win_llvm_compile to dpdk_llvm_clang_compile to more clearly indicate this is the clang compile, per our conversation) -All 3 compile options are also compiling with mlx5 devx using cflags/ldflags per https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1174. This request came in from NVIDIA guys, and we ran it by Tyler from Microsoft who indicated it was a good idea. -MSVC does not run unit tests (I believe this is because msvc does not currently compile enough of dpdk for unit tests) Is there a particular compile option or set of compile options which you want to run unit tests after the build? Please let me know anything you want changed/added to our CI testing pipelines. Thanks! -DPDK Community Lab Team --0000000000006c24d0062c64e874 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Andre,=C2=A0<= /div>

Thank you for joining the CI call this morning and= for raising the topic of Windows compile and unit tests at the UNH lab.=C2= =A0

I have confirmed we are publishing build resul= ts for the 3 compile toolchain options described on dpdk.org=C2=A0these are:

llvm-clang nativ= e compile
mingw64 native compile
msvc native compile

Here is an example of a compile report including the= se. https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2025-January/845150.h= tml

Some notes about the compile options:

-I have now renamed the clang test from dpdk_win_llvm_= compile to dpdk_llvm_clang_compile to more clearly indicate this is the cla= ng compile, per our conversation)

-All 3 compile o= ptions are also compiling with mlx5 devx using cflags/ldflags per=C2=A0https://bugs.dpdk.org/= show_bug.cgi?id=3D1174. This request came in from NVIDIA guys, and we r= an it by Tyler from Microsoft who indicated it was a good idea.
<= br>
-MSVC does not run unit tests (I believe this is because msvc= does not currently compile enough of dpdk for unit tests)

Is there a particular compile option or set of compile options whi= ch you want to run unit tests after the build? Please let me know anything = you want changed/added to our CI testing pipelines.

Thanks!

-DPDK Community Lab Team
--0000000000006c24d0062c64e874--