From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8CF4576B; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 14:37:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244EE4279C; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 14:37:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oa1-f42.google.com (mail-oa1-f42.google.com [209.85.160.42]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871DE42790 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 14:37:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oa1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2642cfb2f6aso626793fac.2 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2024 05:37:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1723120644; x=1723725444; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=cqmKUrx5CxdDleiOPE31LVJOzKfZAZ9Eli4oGEaSZNs=; b=jfAZgDFwm8tXTVNOXfnqL+PWT+e2golNn3go2l4rwZskmVPStEzdH0QswNTT2LIj4K mCWl7h+V9CMNGW1Dv1RM75dqL3ZcpiOh84HJ5h+HQntBOWpNLZvysJxsEvTzfCuYO/Jo j2I9Pkis/mxAG/xEBfosfvLtuEEgKwBGsL3eo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723120644; x=1723725444; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cqmKUrx5CxdDleiOPE31LVJOzKfZAZ9Eli4oGEaSZNs=; b=Ccra5rDoXOO8Dc2cMwKAKL+HR1O+3jiJptWRDb4dUAqV2O+jIW59yqO9a3y5dmuled 7ffPDDaA6RxH5hB4+Xr6Kz5hLI+r6QKxOiLU5yK6GUWGGi7ilOZFAspwZ7Cd9B/9wCAz TqxcIffqeMeDlZO6V+fstxRGnaExGjgz+CfoGnLmTX3S5wjNyffbUivOkuwQhVDlGfKZ n2eMl93Cy80SIdrcnotamqKeGLSYwh0yGEljOeEtxancqprzqlR1SfwUni+cXbwM21lP zCWTVsvD8yDkszezU5DmAjDypJX+7Wdg9teaNPAwAHtNpqS/jTOUJsUlmjcc9K6kfYC7 UUGQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUcJ9JmeHp1mNKJL+FKOQQ5RrPkR0k+yw45Z/IrMbSqfi84TZyW+v69BipRmilsgZFBq2eU/Aziiriv6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw3+iFUrTU1uxigwIdbVK0ZkD1ia7dllSTiqNRVV4Hj6joMbjTw Os6qBJw/Jln2b9/3aC0SIpw1hvD6qdZQYrH0IT6lgCpkOJvYa5EisxqWgacTWpO4fmaMS0O2cUw urMEElkchK+6FClcZm7GrVHmpxCNYmxKWzd5Lmg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGcbH70+LlWGR3yUEpTyURgQ/0V4WMr1uc6Ocqz8wxBU4vsHcWi71XwfWmLkIxtZgwEka4NMlLeUX9R7RjiQj8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:29c:b0:260:e83b:cc13 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2692b699071mr1964607fac.28.1723120644670; Thu, 08 Aug 2024 05:37:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 08:37:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: compilation|FAILURE| pw(142339) sid(32483) job(PER_PATCH_BUILD12580)[v8, 5/5] dts: add API doc generation To: "Liao, TingtingX" Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Juraj_Linke=C5=A1?= , "Xu, HailinX" , "Cui, KaixinX" , "ci@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 11:28=E2=80=AFPM Liao, TingtingX wrote: > > Hi Juraj, > > Sorry, we cannot modify the parameters of CI apply patch without authoriz= ation. > The doc directory is used to store documents and does not support code su= bmission. > Based on the special circumstances of your patch, you can directly contac= t the community maintainer to decide whether to merge this patch. > Okay, I agree that if needed we can just talk to the maintainers, do a manual test for this patch, and they can merge based on the results of manual testing. But, what authorization are you referring to, for modifying the build options? Do you mean it needs to be authorized by DPDK maintainers, or by the CI community, or by someone at Intel STV team? We are not using this build option at the UNH CI testing lab, which is why I want to understand better why it is being used on your end. What are the "predictable risks?" Sorry for taking up your time. I also want to make sure that we at UNH are not using a bad process!