From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1429B48BAC; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 19:17:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3CE40B9A; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 19:17:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pf1-f178.google.com (mail-pf1-f178.google.com [209.85.210.178]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B65C40615 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 19:17:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pf1-f178.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7acd9a03ba9so6602139b3a.1 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:17:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1764094636; x=1764699436; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Cwmbz9l8n1oNDWp8iFiKTvDct4An+SxcNW34qUcapqM=; b=R1Yyc3J7KYVrjh76kQPhSVtvbepG+hJe6FSDjS0pATaOBasS9MiXHeoRINOANZ61zh /OtD8T27yJbx+4fKqFMdcgSOKPJoTZP9L6XCei48GnK7D473DD8eErrBe/P3eU9Stxn7 cTnq3XSEpDeMZ82dYJhAnwqN9Pu6rklIUDvcg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1764094636; x=1764699436; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Cwmbz9l8n1oNDWp8iFiKTvDct4An+SxcNW34qUcapqM=; b=U0VpoXOHgVv4Mv+OJqxDwmXyOSC2R6wdQDZksT4J1yPT2OK57lHx3S+owjzt6ZlVjx br4touCaKIlaYhen/QXWpRTwxakcC/mFBQaBQYQODBdNWg7RE8K71Cb7FiLfIwgDdy/C k2C3Rdz9cKNcX/99Iq39YsDY57IEMjUZEFTvOuUZW9TfX9QlNE7HOUOfjqe81lZxZM05 ARabmJ8wSQWvRTeUwqWldDUOOEaJAL3NjM6un9L5jguMlqZsGKseOn/rytmvq9V9fP0e 86Lpqo1efyXwMrO0NtKnEzVYfyqfdsNaRVzAufNdarCCX2grRRaNzeYji7YLMpyUfXF+ jCyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyNRLnKl2u4jOUfPT4MtCYcH+TeK5ijjNq+1DVAJXnZlaOQa0Si 2SYZWL/LT/JKyVgpXsqfijshtkSO4RlHZ3IHfhamdC00eFxVUvoByMqKp5eid3jhNR9W50AOJb9 c8wgPwczhp1X7BRwi400/zFW6GFdgd7ztdtSJPuIDyA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvddZdWmPiU5fjXIwqIte5+SxJ1x6CgprCheF1M2krbz//CrD41yoBHDppxOaJ 4lyFzGrljlWb1jU7+aXjwVx/2NeZlrRRCyAN6ueAKMoDSk10ArTh5R84JPk2iQFR1Ta03DTE7b/ kcMJv//ZBJocCX0U0oXc9knE300Ysil1Wm8131j+cJZaMbNzChHI6vRdPOnajk+sn/iKA3dLsam GGhuZpTHep9BgBs8frhDkIHi86xh3vpq0hYf9fzFduybcdXblKQjHXB/NNaeVIeHwwIzZs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHoBbrTNbZvbz1FnxMjB/8rIjLc2VEjWxFdxMKIQGWWdiLB3qxqWVe+V+QYVtXxBkMgywgpFxLX5b5equbr+B8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:7022:fa5:b0:11b:9386:8262 with SMTP id a92af1059eb24-11c9d872424mr10137076c88.47.1764094636453; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 10:17:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Patrick Robb Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 13:15:49 -0500 X-Gm-Features: AWmQ_bnsG2NrhX9PUVf_ukaVbHrayYaLGYkqYcDpoOyPbxJRRDUa7SeT5Lef7YA Message-ID: Subject: ABI testing post 25.11 To: "Techboard@dpdk.org" Cc: ci@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000027fbe906446f4af4" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org --00000000000027fbe906446f4af4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello tech board, I recall that earlier in the year, the ABI policy was being re-assessed. I do not recall if there was a conclusion to that discussion and a new policy. Is it still correct that once 25.11 is released the UNH lab should produce an ABI reference from it, and test patches for 26.03 and 26.07 against that ABI reference? Thanks. --00000000000027fbe906446f4af4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello tech board,

I recall t= hat earlier in the year, the ABI policy=C2=A0was being re-assessed. I do no= t recall if there was a conclusion to that discussion and a new policy.

Is it still correct that once 25.11 is released the U= NH lab should produce an ABI reference from it, and test patches for 26.03 = and 26.07 against that ABI reference? Thanks.

--00000000000027fbe906446f4af4--