From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5FF46B2F; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 14:55:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F9640684; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 14:55:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f52.google.com (mail-pj1-f52.google.com [209.85.216.52]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5613440672 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 14:55:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-31393526d0dso3851846a91.0 for ; Wed, 09 Jul 2025 05:55:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1752065734; x=1752670534; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XlWCiJZiOwyoU/5RQYBD86iugy7eZvh8pOqx+kibCZI=; b=CHPfuBLPJhC1flLLeICZKuEi39TTZiSqlsxCLxZxkpHK4wV/Zg6PbAtIOihC7OWtgE XlkhkyrABwJA+6mq0WHMgYHereRSo9nLs/Cfpj0QCSmVMJ3Y1fAjALLYHugjFI2upynw f3vRtXjrM0RDrmwFOgFeDg362sjEYGa32NlKo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1752065734; x=1752670534; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=XlWCiJZiOwyoU/5RQYBD86iugy7eZvh8pOqx+kibCZI=; b=qsko0R6uKSW6mXGQZflWmjE78txeJzPE0mJPptmojVeJAndyCeIIC0KfFunGu//zwJ KGL4+FucaWJmN3JUjAStVplBOsnY14eStn0b5GZVuT+23CILf2Z9UD0wILreDHob8g2/ TQE/pgFbopbnLFTADTqKZYxXxsZ500w4EX9czurwhgAN8VJ3f0X8T6H1APfbgQP6dHeM zr1lK+V2mR4aXTHbxHh3vazaSTj5+X3U3P/XyA5tM/U/6wR9EvYzIgpNm8EUved8T19Q lRpRFBJO8Qq076i/2+tqVuoRbHNVBYBjv8UhZOZvs+p6v9Yc9vc9Hyg0QLhJWK4IqLwH TVaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwzyhyUENsQRggm+fJCiYnfwhztaAG0lTFxhPh0hEl0vuIkMuVh X1PkVr76SesD/51gBJ4J0b/TUs//u6FZFXOvrvY82Yu42dQmJoMLktxwr/T4f+8vr4UQ79burut oTl9qnJCH6v8D64XcOl4hzDlpjcUYEYdZH4cY0jSNsw== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctXKUl7DVDYuJoaQ1HhmHL3AtWBw6KbwqZUmVFsqLJFl8UCT8QRtM+0SnpXKQ2 nfo4z/L0uMQQNaVjwTChdarmePqztx8ojkcawD3VC7bYdEan2pIdSejtKcXd2FTxPWXkU4sAyhM 3W8PSTksFpPGOqQGfHh3utq1MNDBeuoL2QS6mGUiQuLSZV4Mnhgy0Ms4YZyGOqp1CIGdF6TexDw 3Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFHG16dCLclZxFEdwBjRVXdKTDMHiHHVgPdCpKN0CDMWUix1rFLmUqoS1Ykki9DNg804yTKRs+8fncPxXMnY+A= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4c8f:b0:313:2206:adf1 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-31c2fcbd884mr4098047a91.4.1752065734537; Wed, 09 Jul 2025 05:55:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <24d143d3-4739-457d-bf15-c6224ca21bb0@loongson.cn> <123907a4-bfa2-180d-7abd-fe4c498c5381@loongson.cn> In-Reply-To: <123907a4-bfa2-180d-7abd-fe4c498c5381@loongson.cn> From: Patrick Robb Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 08:49:51 -0400 X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXxCbHIVjFsMmax8za2jfkpTEe9_xq1b63N_3s4RfiogrXmbN1CPX_sdWco Message-ID: Subject: Re: Email based retests for the Loongarch lab To: zhoumin Cc: ci@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole , David Marchand , "Brandes, Shai" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bb092506397e9719" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000bb092506397e9719 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Zhoumin, Aaron did approve the get_reruns.py patch for the rebase arg and merge it to dpdk-ci. So, you are good to pull that into your dpdk-ci fork. On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:16=E2=80=AFAM zhoumin wrot= e: > Maybe you can apply it, give it a run and add a tested by tag to the patc= h > if it is working for you? > > Yes, I have tested it and it is working for me. This patch has a little > changes in the inputs and outputs to get_reruns.py, and I need to make > corresponding changes to our current implementation of retest. > > > Okay, thanks. When you get the free time to implement these change please ping me so I know we are ready for any next steps (like updating the labs recheck support status on the DPDK website). --000000000000bb092506397e9719 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Zhoumin,

Aaron did = approve the get_reruns.py patch for the rebase arg and merge it to dpdk-ci.= So, you are good to pull that into your dpdk-ci fork.

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:16=E2=80=AFAM zhoumin <zhoumin@loongson.cn> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
Maybe you can apply it, give it a run= and add a tested by tag to the patch if it is working for you?
Yes, I have tested it and it is working for me. This patch has a little changes in the inputs and outputs to get_reruns.py, and I need to make corresponding changes to our current implementation of retest.

Okay, thanks. When you get the free time to implement these = change please ping me so I know we are ready for any next steps (like updat= ing the labs recheck support status on the DPDK website).=C2=A0
=
--000000000000bb092506397e9719--