From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86AD243423; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 22:24:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60298402EE; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 22:24:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-oa1-f54.google.com (mail-oa1-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1235B402EE for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2023 22:24:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oa1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-1f066fc2a2aso585842fac.0 for ; Fri, 01 Dec 2023 13:24:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1701465879; x=1702070679; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jq0smFBeD8st1a6CVRcuIzvOoA1EywpDILimZwHxfQU=; b=caMFw7MYZmxT+r7iyAh01m+C1xcT6OiNFsUY5VJGy0++MRB3Pk8EPnyQN7i+zNxSwu gn7PWjsarDo5kERZlBKzuA8JVRsraCydL7/PhU8afxV1RToBtuzS6awWO27ld06NEjyp ytA/V23ePIXWDB74X1wyJV2ePyqBn7+5FoikA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701465879; x=1702070679; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=jq0smFBeD8st1a6CVRcuIzvOoA1EywpDILimZwHxfQU=; b=JO4zY7O/3LE60UubEduheqjqV9WZBf/yDnYlJnCY3tt/t9lpADeUDDHphnJYYrHwXR QM883UkxRHNE6EBOsW09VnnpHZ9M29/x5Xg7Qi82HHx7W3WdV9CCoKZOxaY8GdFEiZzd lTnNnY2wNt5BLwj9e5C70NlgEB0qvlxkvRXmvm8J2HLjxzLDvpb0tBpd7LxC+S6AzF56 bPNpeqLcUswE3wNBrFIpcqdjrPAPsKwgkelDwA49ijyMshLUA+xuDa2IkoGiOYlM8Dox 8hoxo9RWGttj7aaC1/AlHnqKBQVRf+AW79rbXzcHsLINquxFHZBuUV81CSR0o5kh+TAg E1VA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwBwQByjfiSv58jUpFORFtGsC2wdTneNKOHGtsM25xzdfJj8IpU UObcfG5BZodTWT4NT3PiCm49KbvrOAq7bTd5DBttDQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFijBZ3cXANRfour+okJulfyZXENp/vFQjQJArrACAevUYYXz2qXcnyMjnNrgf190iXWD6ta44DGU9GK7M6/AM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:530a:b0:1fa:f049:7a21 with SMTP id j10-20020a056870530a00b001faf0497a21mr243016oan.13.1701465879340; Fri, 01 Dec 2023 13:24:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20231129161858.997576-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <2163541.irdbgypaU6@thomas> In-Reply-To: <2163541.irdbgypaU6@thomas> From: Patrick Robb Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 16:24:28 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] version: 24.03-rc0 To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Ferruh Yigit , Bruce Richardson , David Marchand , dev@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole , Michael Santana , Andrew Rybchenko , Ajit Khaparde , Qi Zhang , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Raslan Darawsheh , Maxime Coquelin , Akhil Goyal , ci@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000055fd1f060b796525" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org --00000000000055fd1f060b796525 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:09=E2=80=AFPM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 01/12/2023 18:24, Patrick Robb: > > For staging branches, Based on TB voting I did add a work item to the > 2024 > > lab SOW for "on-push" staging branch testing, which we will do via thes= e > > GitHub branches (so like, next-virtio-staging). > > Not sure about testing staging branches for next-*. > Each patch is already tested individually. > Then the ready branch for-* is tested again regularly. > I think the staging branch is more for manual testing. > There is also GitHub Actions doing an automatic test. > Instead of "on-push" testing, we could propose a manual trigger > if we want to avoid overloading the lab during critical release times. > > > Okay. I will leave it until Monday for any sub-tree maintainers to chime in if they disagree. Otherwise, I will remove the staging branch testing work item, and add in a work item for adding a manual trigger. Thanks. --00000000000055fd1f060b796525 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:09=E2=80=AFP= M Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalo= n.net> wrote:
01/12/2023 18:24, Patrick Robb:
> For staging branches, Based on TB voting I did add a work item to the = 2024
> lab SOW for "on-push" staging branch testing, which we will = do via these
> GitHub branches (so like, next-virtio-staging).

Not sure about testing staging branches for next-*.
Each patch is already tested individually.
Then the ready branch for-* is tested again regularly.
I think the staging branch is more for manual testing.
There is also GitHub Actions doing an automatic test.
Instead of "on-push" testing, we could propose a manual trigger if we want to avoid overloading the lab during critical release times.


Okay. I will leave it until Monday for any sub-tree= maintainers to chime in if they disagree. Otherwise, I will remove the sta= ging branch testing work item, and add in a work item for adding a manual t= rigger. Thanks.=C2=A0
--00000000000055fd1f060b796525--