From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B83455E3; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 15:29:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A262D4060F; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 15:29:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oo1-f52.google.com (mail-oo1-f52.google.com [209.85.161.52]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8A7402E8 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 15:29:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oo1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5c477d97159so2628903eaf.3 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2024 06:29:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1720531774; x=1721136574; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=dn4XNe5bpPu8222NswY9c7eobGpTMctLvoCE2/pKXuk=; b=YVz5i3sqmbdvlGGl9aWxXKzo8dSZJo4KJuul6vj+59Nptl1OauU4VQ2RFl7vZbUq8g PcsEYXrQoSySY44jvUUfQBPYjEbYGnOeutVwUWycrwI34wgPV+3egFMLwPtpPozI1Prl bQapkrr9fCQ8q5t06L4PgQLb/JVRW4OXB31B4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720531774; x=1721136574; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dn4XNe5bpPu8222NswY9c7eobGpTMctLvoCE2/pKXuk=; b=Rxw7yspKM+5JJWznjoID4wuOyUkMq0RNf+dCsRnZZmvLEN/Qy4v3xxzigQtHx330/i IHK2M+09Vahy57sa+/P/sjhyMZ8MxuEj4ai+qd5axuufid+DPVhQ/Ut1AvdNjNDOmHhn 6NFustEpOEYYdmWjz0o4G8B9nMRYKNfPu0DrC61qmZkg0EM5rXQ3d2RrKwe+S9glr069 OtJsfjTU25RvyIH69o0R6BnwONXnNrGZSLQIh2GU/XtX9PTlIPN3xSVPf7lqEAHmxjsN 1cZlygDUADD1VwtdLv246KqIIoqJpjqzIfMrSEHUUn9cWEN8WLceZ4Gk+6W7lFUYShWY VM7Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVeSzzy/laz+YrkUGKrRx0zLo39A0sFSARB7ka6cMd3VLsyU0tfwzAT8WO4uO3zcdRes/S9JCj1DC3RRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwadBbVt6m3JZvO9A/AknDcri2uNhSuIqpJYskqL8jCK/bvBeHP vmYOmUSX08vyN7zNkJPR264UpXRf7QmnNGZvFWOZdnUqU0+5LiVR/cZcKdIa1po7LbaXzRrQow5 IIGmAZQ+067rIUbq3mtdUBAew+RzI+9rVL0YHzg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGvWmA/GjBfS8/nw0GyCIKwZGDKuf1JJQNPA4QYtdxIlI54FmCOyHtkRexr2Xzce9+n5zJBr28E0HmaaOKX2eU= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:aa4e:0:b0:5c2:ac6:935f with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5c68e4a4453mr2580733eaf.9.1720531774248; Tue, 09 Jul 2024 06:29:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 09:29:23 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DPDK CI: 23.11-staging not updated To: David Marchand Cc: Xueming Li , Cody Cheng , "NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)" , ci@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 3:37=E2=80=AFAM David Marchand wrote: > Xueming, > > Do you have the full output of when you pushed? > I suspect there was some error or warning at the moment you pushed, it > could have been a transient issue (networking issue?). > > >From the part of the conversation ahead of adding you to CC list, it looks like Xueming tried force pushing twice yesterday, and CI was not triggered either time. So, this reduces the likelihood of a transient error. But I will let Xueming tell their side.