I see Luca just sent a new version of 22.11 which includes the Grace build patch, so this build "issue" should now be resolved for his tree. I hope we will see the same patch reach 23.11 soon. :) Thanks for doing this Doug and Luca. On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 1:15 PM Patrick Robb wrote: > Hi Doug, > > Without overburdening you with details, at the CI lab we have some tests > which run with werror=true (treat warnings as errors) and some which run > without it. The tests which I'm currently trying to extend to LTS for Grace > do not have this flag included, i.e. they are tolerant to warnings. So, we > should be good to proceed with your patch. > > Although no warnings on 22.11 and 23.11 would open us up to adding > werror=true build tests directly on Grace in the future, there isn't an ask > for this right now and I don't think we will need to support it. So, again > I think we can proceed with your patch as is. > > Thanks for handling this. > > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 1:00 PM Doug Foster wrote: > >> Hi Patrick, >> >> While building 22.11 and 23.11 with GCC 13.3, I noticed compiler warnings >> related to memcpy usage, specifically involving __builtin___memcpy_chk >> failures. >> Would these warnings be a concern for CI test runs, or are they generally >> tolerated? >> >> From: Doug Foster >> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2025 12:16 AM >> To: Patrick Robb ; Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage < >> wathsala.vithanage@arm.com> >> Cc: ci@dpdk.org; dev ; Honnappa Nagarahalli < >> Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; stable@dpdk.org; nd >> Subject: RE: meson error on ARM Grace server 23.11/22.11 >> >> Hi Patrick, >> >> I will produce the patches with necessary changes to build on Grace for >> 22.11 and 23.11. >> >> From: Patrick Robb >> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2025 3:59 PM >> To: Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage >> Cc: mailto:ci@dpdk.org; dev ; Honnappa Nagarahalli >> ; mailto:stable@dpdk.org; Doug >> Foster ; nd >> Subject: Re: meson error on ARM Grace server 23.11/22.11 >> >> Thanks Wathsala, >> >> How can we help on the UNH side? Do you want us to produce the 22.11 and >> 23.11 diffs/patches, which would be based on d007038, with some >> modifications based on what you had said to Doug? >> >> I'm not sure what the process looks like exactly for providing backports >> to LTS maintainers. >> >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 12:00 PM Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage > wathsala.vithanage@arm.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > At the DPDK Community Lab we have been running CI tests with a new ARM >> > Grace server for the past couple of months on main and next-* branches. >> I am >> > trying to add LTS runs now, and ran into a snag with 23.11 and 22.11 >> for this >> > system. Stable maintainers I'm not sure whether this should be >> addressed or not >> > for hardware which is new and didn't exist when 22.11 and 23.11 were >> > released... but I figured I'd make the tickets and find out. I attached >> the meson >> > logs to the tickets and if for whatever reason you guys want to remote >> into this >> > machine, I'm happy to setup the VPN and SSH access. >> > >> > 22.11: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1703 >> > 23.11: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1702 >> >> +doug >> >> neoverse-v2 is supported in the GCC 13.3 used for this build although >> -mtune/-mcpu >> for grace is not available in that version. >> Adding neoverse-v2 and soc_grace with crypto extension should bring these >> releases >> on par with latest. >> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are >> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended >> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the >> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the >> information in any medium. Thank you. >> >