From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66B846D69; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 20:57:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5D84064F; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 20:57:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pg1-f178.google.com (mail-pg1-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9094042C for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 20:57:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg1-f178.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-b472fd93b4aso3564675a12.0 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 11:57:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1755629837; x=1756234637; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6RDj09zT3oih/LTW5kV2JV0gkbSIvvKorrLkkkzRG0Y=; b=g5nIsqZ63FBrCgeabUcvTgxSDTPLcYr6OFFOXW2mntoCIbD6Ldut23SRDE9pZqWs7a vYGM/mEzorLOTl0MGObfq2Et4ITyzMzQiTxKQ4fBv0G6gIkjg6ZP2nSvXPBTuB6LOaJJ SIQ6WtYP2WRwxCbUEaf2Kuf9aQVDR5XoxdAto= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1755629837; x=1756234637; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=6RDj09zT3oih/LTW5kV2JV0gkbSIvvKorrLkkkzRG0Y=; b=kw1l5a4tB0+MMtGEU5aCA7ckO08o5EevZoNgKnsz/BlZGLHbK7B0mAhl3opfM71T62 zlExM/zivvg8PxLkkguB/agan8zGntFWudQg359+ewAuLnDNr81dvdhM6PxoUyjR4KpV cjAm6c3o4YRyckKIQGXLwtPvgSJUzZ2DpYl+2lLzCMPNjV30PYnWuVwALC28uAoYGprh gQQtJ8zDrRh9EApsngoT47ZdNVQmUauOcj3t9XxxeHSoLv3XS4koLvGK0SWwH+OckPhf gyXhySa2YgSD3tsZ/39RAQfeNdBjDl0yuH2yDh4xygwbzt0DjLnzpnWzbjknC/zcE5yt ZUrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywzice7htx47M1kpLywg850fCodu4mVRkUc5ViypIt7YSRgfUN5 2r3cu6o4h6yZ+xUFqoRsTjA4D0HHEuL5xMpgduDVzwRJm2s84dTQNP2WBIftcrqvMBBgk+ywv3i LAJ60R3XJhUWy72ab3INpVfvLeZWGlTmD8NgE9JIyhw== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsNhWyb0zZ/qkIRM7W+DEwaQ8uoNoQeh7TAupHEF9B9ZKEpEmhRzJdIJ38JPQK Z/r2ELRfbDg4BfTe80zDPTz4khtTD8/VE14FDClorWYNjXcwmVLRcx5Urtlxh1bAU6CcZwssBEy kB0b90jbzeEDyl6VkjeLCnDF5teJrylaIeTXqsQ7JNz5HZ747tzv2iR7FLiqJL+BT0ZRKNnXCO7 OX0o2xg6V8ziWM9dlq8wiaj3KuKVMRg9F6DtlDz+7X1hh+zi1k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFkXir3uUk56QKNI3Ho2qCoxSaihfePZ/rSrAiD2kyxUymAX0WXM7XRV13M5I99G4lpmOAcaLY+THI0dwuZMgA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ecce:b0:243:47:f61b with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-245ef239393mr594525ad.45.1755629837323; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 11:57:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 14:50:47 -0400 X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXwKRWGGwOPtRWcd5PSYFbfOU0IGRlrDY27-BuB4-H_hftIcd3YdDFUfUDw Message-ID: Subject: Re: meson error on ARM Grace server 23.11/22.11 To: Doug Foster Cc: "ci@dpdk.org" , dev , Honnappa Nagarahalli , "stable@dpdk.org" , nd , Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage , Luca Boccassi Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cfa87b063cbc6cb8" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000cfa87b063cbc6cb8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I see Luca just sent a new version of 22.11 which includes the Grace build patch, so this build "issue" should now be resolved for his tree. I hope we will see the same patch reach 23.11 soon. :) Thanks for doing this Doug and Luca. On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 1:15=E2=80=AFPM Patrick Robb wr= ote: > Hi Doug, > > Without overburdening you with details, at the CI lab we have some tests > which run with werror=3Dtrue (treat warnings as errors) and some which ru= n > without it. The tests which I'm currently trying to extend to LTS for Gra= ce > do not have this flag included, i.e. they are tolerant to warnings. So, w= e > should be good to proceed with your patch. > > Although no warnings on 22.11 and 23.11 would open us up to adding > werror=3Dtrue build tests directly on Grace in the future, there isn't an= ask > for this right now and I don't think we will need to support it. So, agai= n > I think we can proceed with your patch as is. > > Thanks for handling this. > > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 1:00=E2=80=AFPM Doug Foster = wrote: > >> Hi Patrick, >> >> While building 22.11 and 23.11 with GCC 13.3, I noticed compiler warning= s >> related to memcpy usage, specifically involving __builtin___memcpy_chk >> failures. >> Would these warnings be a concern for CI test runs, or are they generall= y >> tolerated? >> >> From: Doug Foster >> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2025 12:16 AM >> To: Patrick Robb ; Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage < >> wathsala.vithanage@arm.com> >> Cc: ci@dpdk.org; dev ; Honnappa Nagarahalli < >> Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; stable@dpdk.org; nd >> Subject: RE: meson error on ARM Grace server 23.11/22.11 >> >> Hi Patrick, >> >> I will produce the patches with necessary changes to build on Grace for >> 22.11 and 23.11. >> >> From: Patrick Robb >> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2025 3:59 PM >> To: Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage >> Cc: mailto:ci@dpdk.org; dev ; Honnappa Nagarahalli >> ; mailto:stable@dpdk.org; Doug >> Foster ; nd >> Subject: Re: meson error on ARM Grace server 23.11/22.11 >> >> Thanks Wathsala, >> >> How can we help on the UNH side? Do you want us to produce the 22.11 and >> 23.11 diffs/patches, which would be based on d007038, with some >> modifications based on what you had said to Doug? >> >> I'm not sure what the process looks like exactly for providing backports >> to LTS maintainers. >> >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 12:00=E2=80=AFPM Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage > wathsala.vithanage@arm.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > At the DPDK Community Lab we have been running CI tests with a new ARM >> > Grace server for the past couple of months on main and next-* branches= . >> I am >> > trying to add LTS runs now, and ran into a snag with 23.11 and 22.11 >> for this >> > system. Stable maintainers I'm not sure whether this should be >> addressed or not >> > for hardware which is new and didn't exist when 22.11 and 23.11 were >> > released... but I figured I'd make the tickets and find out. I attache= d >> the meson >> > logs to the tickets and if for whatever reason you guys want to remote >> into this >> > machine, I'm happy to setup the VPN and SSH access. >> > >> > 22.11: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1703 >> > 23.11: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1702 >> >> +doug >> >> neoverse-v2 is supported in the GCC 13.3 used for this build although >> -mtune/-mcpu >> for grace is not available in that version. >> Adding neoverse-v2 and soc_grace with crypto extension should bring thes= e >> releases >> on par with latest. >> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are >> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended >> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the >> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy t= he >> information in any medium. Thank you. >> > --000000000000cfa87b063cbc6cb8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I see Luca just sent a new version of 22.11 which includes= the Grace build patch, so this build "issue" should=C2=A0now be = resolved for his tree. I hope we will see the same patch reach 23.11 soon. = :)

Thanks for doing this Doug and Luca.
=

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 1:15=E2=80=AFPM Patrick Robb = <probb@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
= Hi Doug,=C2=A0

Without overburdening you with details, a= t the CI lab we have some tests which run with werror=3Dtrue (treat warning= s as errors) and some which run without it. The tests which I'm current= ly trying to extend to LTS for Grace do not have this flag included, i.e. t= hey are tolerant to warnings. So, we should be good to proceed with your pa= tch.

Although no warnings on 22.11 and 23.11 would= open us up to adding werror=3Dtrue build tests directly on Grace in the fu= ture, there isn't an=C2=A0ask for this right now and I don't think = we will need to support it. So, again I think we can proceed with your patc= h as is.

Thanks for handling this.=C2=A0

On T= ue, May 20, 2025 at 1:00=E2=80=AFPM Doug Foster <Doug.Foster@arm.com> wrote:
Hi Patrick,

While building 22.11 and 23.11 with GCC 13.3, I noticed compiler warnings r= elated to memcpy usage, specifically involving __builtin___memcpy_chk failu= res.
Would these warnings be a concern for CI test runs, or are they generally t= olerated?

From: Doug Foster
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2025 12:16 AM
To: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>; Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage <wathsala.vithanage@arm.co= m>
Cc: ci@dpdk.org; dev &= lt;dev@dpdk.org>; = Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; stable@dpdk.org; nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: RE: meson error on ARM Grace server 23.11/22.11

Hi Patrick,

I will produce the patches with necessary changes to build on Grace for 22.= 11 and 23.11.

From: Patrick Robb <mailto:probb@iol.unh.edu>
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2025 3:59 PM
To: Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage <mailto:wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>
Cc: mailto:ci@dpdk.org= ; dev <mailto:dev@dpdk= .org>; Honnappa Nagarahalli <mailto:Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; = mailto:stable@dpdk.org= ; Doug Foster <mailto:Doug.Foster@arm.com>; nd <mailto:nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: meson error on ARM Grace server 23.11/22.11

Thanks Wathsala,

How can we help on the UNH side? Do you want us to produce the 22.11 and 23= .11 diffs/patches, which would be based on d007038, with some modifications= based on what you had said to Doug?

I'm not sure what the process looks like exactly for providing backport= s to LTS maintainers.

On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 12:00=E2=80=AFPM Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage <m= ailto:waths= ala.vithanage@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the DPDK Community Lab we have been running CI tests with a new ARM=
> Grace server for the past couple of months on main and next-* branches= . I am
> trying to add LTS runs now, and ran into a snag with 23.11 and 22.11 f= or this
> system. Stable maintainers I'm not sure whether this should be add= ressed or not
> for hardware which is new and didn't exist when 22.11 and 23.11 we= re
> released... but I figured I'd make the tickets and find out. I att= ached the meson
> logs to the tickets and if for whatever reason you guys want to remote= into this
> machine, I'm happy to setup the VPN and SSH access.
>
> 22.11: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1703=
> 23.11: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1702=

+doug

neoverse-v2 is supported in the GCC 13.3 used for this build although -mtun= e/-mcpu
for grace is not available in that version.
Adding neoverse-v2 and soc_grace with crypto extension should bring these r= eleases
on par with latest.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confid= ential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, p= lease notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any= other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in = any medium. Thank you.
--000000000000cfa87b063cbc6cb8--