From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F38A4408A; Tue, 21 May 2024 23:33:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A6C402D2; Tue, 21 May 2024 23:33:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oo1-f52.google.com (mail-oo1-f52.google.com [209.85.161.52]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797FB4021F for ; Tue, 21 May 2024 23:33:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oo1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5b3241a69f4so2001948eaf.2 for ; Tue, 21 May 2024 14:33:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1716327179; x=1716931979; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tFKFsOm6J/HYLmw1nvkaSFWpWnaR8owVZw+5iIPEicI=; b=QMtj/sCnn2dFWsIr6dG3ezAApOwcBFjw6D1SSsMDgRUej9MZjBE73z2M2Bs5mBs+6R g3C5zR5S2v3mkmZRzCoSyVh8mnVSfW1kOG9KfhonmP8gUBj2pJudFlD/0+3kY3TsGGy7 El0nTC35agTZA7Fn3Flv+m6bMcDL8m3HPHktU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1716327179; x=1716931979; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tFKFsOm6J/HYLmw1nvkaSFWpWnaR8owVZw+5iIPEicI=; b=VIFV8pNlchTNDYtHnaH5C0YUhq/86QcLMIqeMmDDy4IFvk1rUu3NnglcsGK2qpSO2T 1wKomB5gNi+x+7lzpiRR/spxQfGy/iFWmheawX+rIVnm56cEG1rbDaV9Ddq/8Fp+Cp9l LKMCPJjxmriMS912TawBB5lfMVyGomm9jTM1pOL05KBxxgXT2972QOP1b34De6EQwffY SL8KaGi45u7oDsfU3KriUVidT2J+DlCdTyJiFPzUZ+Vzb2tGzwxCew4kbtmZpnPfZRg8 BYEJiXX0DbVU0GtMNw0cz3b4ZQUcDz89l2xXz2+Yyo9w/y9WOjLjHZgEb+RPMyJwpQg8 Wk0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwLjoUCkL3oBBOGqlHsr0uLRF6NozvK8tTr9awxLtWJf9TS8f2c lA4C9FP7gQk/sjhA4shEwiVuREwoc1EQtLwlDpgcrdBs11kML5hmSiOiLJX9p6F4UCIvrHBhSLa oln0dlusxbtzwvmdOjXvRD2RPD+ONLlB4kageW7lnal6A6MFoXkd0Ug== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFsDebYCNsF0xTmyOZVoZ26GiyrhAxKoWB04L0br9q6P3irGZmlIktKgTDGd/kJv1e4nLCTvbeljVELPetxryY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:2585:b0:5b5:3df2:326e with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5b6a4d681a6mr262384eaf.9.1716327179589; Tue, 21 May 2024 14:32:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Patrick Robb Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 17:32:47 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: check-meson.py in CI To: ci@dpdk.org Cc: Ferruh Yigit , Aaron Conole , Ali Alnubani , Adam Hassick , Cody Cheng Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Hi all, Ferruh has requested that we start running the ./devtools/check-meson.py script in CI testing. Questions: 1. Should it be similar to how Ali runs checkpatches.sh, in that it would have it's own patchwork context (check-meson)? I think the one difference is that it can run just 1x/series, instead of on each individual patch file. 2. Who should run it? It would be a simple addition for the community lab, but if there is some compelling reason for it running alongside checkpatch, let me know Ali. Thanks.