From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E9845716; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 21:39:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFF64067E; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 21:39:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oi1-f176.google.com (mail-oi1-f176.google.com [209.85.167.176]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A6D4066E for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 21:39:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi1-f176.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3db145c8010so4677952b6e.3 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2024 12:39:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1722541161; x=1723145961; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=A8lnWWvA8g/bWTh9RO3iCiE7SEY2n22z+g8HnYhAMQo=; b=BMrQMD1mrQBBjmyp4XlKD2aFiIzlwBZPLKebUgUDAAhnNei0td01L5b4Kw3cHRclFT XOo76hk0fsCdm/pyhcd2mnXpFQcWwfex585Gh+phj7/gRnG+GP9O89f5QcF1py5jVcl9 k+TYaEC/d2QHLi7ILGKERNTptReJrnWw9EDGs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722541161; x=1723145961; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=A8lnWWvA8g/bWTh9RO3iCiE7SEY2n22z+g8HnYhAMQo=; b=JarEGopYxfklFc7+NUXp783UAEMi8L/8t0al372ixQ+y+eYDf8ocfL+Fqizdtf3fJa b7kr6Qn36Bj4JoA0AyLcqlXr+1nIopqU51VrMYPsEm4LabWvWWnA9w/bAj0SGzvnDcWv 2nVPVh+Lji7apul/Nn/1QzkeAmK+lgfHSzLoyCFuwZ0zJLLH0JmeE31F2mi/Eoid09yq 7mmSiIl4dpylIT6Ay35lLdC+1qD7g1Whum3B9llVm6nQEy3+Dr9trxS0rh0XJZRNAoG9 lwxvNAJYk/fSseP0Zzk2VIlNbnbFcvqH9F3keiT1XY075bCJFpZEyLuF+pZbTiv44/lh nrxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx29gRImh/LhUTr0jMnDcOzmzArBxKD+WJLRHjIEmv9BX1T9o2N XTGRor0NgKPyNrs1YmFbAuqmg41EVmm4AJnxlf0j45UBxVXPIWZC+mjrG5Gtoi/0/4YwrWvHfnz Hy1iNKVqAF27F0sfDSKRAcOG37DH48kyr4LcHYg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE0uITvcEkE+kA3WPV2hW3ixawS/VPnLSFcbN2Ry4CgtGtFE7zkCRrPRs7PQsddFjlfaMSodLy58hFUbzPZRNE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2001:b0:3d9:29c1:be5c with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3db557fec68mr1376556b6e.12.1722541161418; Thu, 01 Aug 2024 12:39:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Patrick Robb Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 15:39:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: DTS WG Meeting Minutes - August 1, 2024 To: dev Cc: ci@dpdk.org, dts@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org August 1, 2024 ##################################################################### Attendees * Patrick Robb * Jeremy Spewock * Nicholas Pratte * Juraj Linke=C5=A1 * Alex Chapman * Luca Vizzarro ##################################################################### Minutes =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D General Announcements * DPDK 24.07 is released * DPDK Summit CFP deadline has passed. Luca submitted a talk for setting up DTS and running testsuites. Patrick submitted a talk for CI Labs/community update and new CI testing coverage, tools, etc. available to DPDK developers. * Draft of DTS 24.11 roadmap: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Rcp1-gZWzGGCCSkbEsigrd0-NoQmknv6ZS7V2CP= dgFo/edit * Do we want to add DTS items to release notes? * What is the process for building the release notes? Should the people working on DTS aggregate the updates and submit them? Patrick Robbshould check the website for the release notes process, or email the dev mailing list asking. * Dpdk-next-dts has been set up: https://git.dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-dts/ * We should continue to submit patches like normal. Juraj will apply the patches to next-dts as needed. * Once the patches are in next DTS for-main branch, they can be pulled into DPDK main at any time by Thomas/David * Some AWS engineers are invited to the CI call for next week. * Will talk about reporting publicly using their internal tooling * Will talk about reporting using dpdk-test from AWS * Will (possibly) talk about DTS at AWS =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Patch discussions * Adding support for DTS creating device VFs: * Shouldn=E2=80=99t need any additions to the config file. * There can be a capability associated with this, i.e. this testsuite requires VFs, then we run =E2=80=9Cdpdk-devbind.py -s=E2=80=9D an= d parse out the output for available VFs. * Method for creating the VFs can return the list of VFs which can be stored in the testsuite object as VF ports * Ipv4_reassembly: not eth_dev, will not be implemented in new DTS. * Patrick Robbneeds to strike through this row, and give Luca edit access on the spreadsheet * We need to add more testsuites to the list. Dean Marxand Patrick Robbshould sync on this to discuss the new list that Dean put together, and find some more cases. * We often ship testsuites patches and testpmd shell additions together, and the testpmd shell addition gets locked up for an extended period of time as the testsuite gets reviews. If we spit out the testsuite additions and the framework additions, we can merge the framework additions quickly into the dts staging branch. For now, we can ship testsuite patches and their respective framework updates together, and split them out if we reach the 2nd half of a release cycle and we need to start moving. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Bugzilla discussions * Looking into submitting a bugzilla ticket for mlx5 NICs not distinguishing between having a bad checksum and having no checksum in testpmd verbose output. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Any other business * Next meeting Aug 15, 2024