From: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>
To: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
ci@dpdk.org, Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: BNXT patches
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 20:36:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJvnSUDeOOPYPfX8jMO_UA-w9UmiW1vikn=_ndLyWj6AAMx30A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACZ4nhtkhWPOikZ+kG4AZcfrii-0xNoZ1hNJ2BCR=JvX6GQ=yw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4426 bytes --]
There are multiple next-net-brcm branches at
https://git.dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net-brcm/. I have chosen the
for-next-net branch. Let me know if I should adjust.
So, you can go to https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/periodic_testing/
and select the "showing branch" dropdown on the right and select
"next-net-brcm-for-next-net"
I kicked off a run from that branch so it should populate a new set of
results within a couple hours. Then like I said a new run of that branch
will kick off every 48 hours.
Good luck!
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 8:09 PM Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 4:52 PM Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
> >
> > That solution also makes sense.
> Agree. Thanks Thomas.
>
> >
> > For the per-branch periodic testing page that Thomas is mentioning
> (here: https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/periodic_testing/) we are
> publishing regular test reports on next-net, but not next-net-brcm. But, it
> makes sense for us to start periodic runs on next-net-brcm, so I will add
> this now. It should only take a few minutes to add to our CI system. Then I
> will do a manual trigger which will add the first periodic testrun for
> next-net-brcm. Otherwise, it should run once every other day at midnight US
> eastern time.
> >
> > Let us know if this solution works for you Ajit. Thanks.
>
> Yes, Patrick, this should work.
>
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 7:36 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Not related to CI, but the best would be to not wait a year
> >> for updating the driver in one series.
> >>
> >> As you maintain a repository branch,
> >> you can merge the patches and wait for UNH CI running on it.
> >> Also the GitHub robot can run if you push in a GitHub repo.
> >>
> >>
> >> 23/10/2025 01:05, Patrick Robb:
> >> > Hi Ajit,
> >> >
> >> > That sounds annoying. A sanity check question to start - is there any
> sense
> >> > in resubmitting the series and just intentionally delaying sending
> the 2nd
> >> > half of the commits? I.e.
> >> >
> >> > 1. git send-email /my-patches-dir/*
> >> > 2. Send the first 30
> >> > 3. At prompt for 31st patch, pause.
> >> > 4. wait 10 minutes.
> >> > 5. Return to terminal, send patches 31 through 57.
> >> >
> >> > Or, if this is not possible, I think there should be some solution on
> the
> >> > patchwork mail server policy side. I think Ali Alnubani from NVIDIA
> manages
> >> > it and he is usually pretty responsive with such modification
> requests. We
> >> > could ask about solutions like:
> >> >
> >> > 1. Add a complete exception to the mail server message rate
> restriction for
> >> > emails coming from email addresses associated with DPDK member
> companies.
> >> >
> >> > or
> >> >
> >> > 2. Simply make the message rate restrictions more permissive than
> they are
> >> > currently (i.e. allow 100 emails, not 30).
> >> >
> >> > If the ideas above will not work, I will have to assess the "bundle"
> idea
> >> > tomorrow when I have time available than I do right now. Most likely
> it's
> >> > technically possible to facilitate but I do feel like simply
> resolving the
> >> > original issue (the mail server is not letting you submit your
> series) and
> >> > allowing the CI system automation to intake the patchseries from
> patchwork
> >> > in the normal way is the ideal approach.
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 5:39 PM Ajit Khaparde <
> ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Patrick,
> >> > > When Manish was submitting his patchset,
> >> > > Looks like because of a mail server message rate restriction,
> >> > > only 31 of 57 patches went through in the first attempt
> >> > >
> >> > > He submitted the remaining patches 32 to 57 in second attempt.
> >> > >
> >> > > I created a bundle for the series now. [1]
> >> > >
> >> > > Also a couple of patches were stuck at the gate.
> >> > > So a proper build has not happened on the patchset yet. [2]
> >> > > Do we have a way to trigger a build on the bundle?
> >> > >
> >> > > Please advise.
> >> > >
> >> > > [1] https://patchwork.dpdk.org/bundle/ajitkhaparde/BNXT%2025.11/
> >> > > [2]
> https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2025-October/921500.html
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks
> >> > > Ajit
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6255 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-23 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CACZ4nhvBbK1kC8oCwkHRn+Mnov9zXgAwUsKduEc8wO3EXs7huw@mail.gmail.com>
2025-10-22 23:05 ` Patrick Robb
2025-10-22 23:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-10-22 23:52 ` Patrick Robb
2025-10-23 0:09 ` Ajit Khaparde
2025-10-23 0:36 ` Patrick Robb [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJvnSUDeOOPYPfX8jMO_UA-w9UmiW1vikn=_ndLyWj6AAMx30A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=probb@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=alialnu@nvidia.com \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).