There are multiple next-net-brcm branches at https://git.dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net-brcm/. I have chosen the for-next-net branch. Let me know if I should adjust. So, you can go to https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/periodic_testing/ and select the "showing branch" dropdown on the right and select "next-net-brcm-for-next-net" I kicked off a run from that branch so it should populate a new set of results within a couple hours. Then like I said a new run of that branch will kick off every 48 hours. Good luck! On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 8:09 PM Ajit Khaparde wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 4:52 PM Patrick Robb wrote: > > > > That solution also makes sense. > Agree. Thanks Thomas. > > > > > For the per-branch periodic testing page that Thomas is mentioning > (here: https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/periodic_testing/) we are > publishing regular test reports on next-net, but not next-net-brcm. But, it > makes sense for us to start periodic runs on next-net-brcm, so I will add > this now. It should only take a few minutes to add to our CI system. Then I > will do a manual trigger which will add the first periodic testrun for > next-net-brcm. Otherwise, it should run once every other day at midnight US > eastern time. > > > > Let us know if this solution works for you Ajit. Thanks. > > Yes, Patrick, this should work. > > > > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 7:36 PM Thomas Monjalon > wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> Not related to CI, but the best would be to not wait a year > >> for updating the driver in one series. > >> > >> As you maintain a repository branch, > >> you can merge the patches and wait for UNH CI running on it. > >> Also the GitHub robot can run if you push in a GitHub repo. > >> > >> > >> 23/10/2025 01:05, Patrick Robb: > >> > Hi Ajit, > >> > > >> > That sounds annoying. A sanity check question to start - is there any > sense > >> > in resubmitting the series and just intentionally delaying sending > the 2nd > >> > half of the commits? I.e. > >> > > >> > 1. git send-email /my-patches-dir/* > >> > 2. Send the first 30 > >> > 3. At prompt for 31st patch, pause. > >> > 4. wait 10 minutes. > >> > 5. Return to terminal, send patches 31 through 57. > >> > > >> > Or, if this is not possible, I think there should be some solution on > the > >> > patchwork mail server policy side. I think Ali Alnubani from NVIDIA > manages > >> > it and he is usually pretty responsive with such modification > requests. We > >> > could ask about solutions like: > >> > > >> > 1. Add a complete exception to the mail server message rate > restriction for > >> > emails coming from email addresses associated with DPDK member > companies. > >> > > >> > or > >> > > >> > 2. Simply make the message rate restrictions more permissive than > they are > >> > currently (i.e. allow 100 emails, not 30). > >> > > >> > If the ideas above will not work, I will have to assess the "bundle" > idea > >> > tomorrow when I have time available than I do right now. Most likely > it's > >> > technically possible to facilitate but I do feel like simply > resolving the > >> > original issue (the mail server is not letting you submit your > series) and > >> > allowing the CI system automation to intake the patchseries from > patchwork > >> > in the normal way is the ideal approach. > >> > > >> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 5:39 PM Ajit Khaparde < > ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi Patrick, > >> > > When Manish was submitting his patchset, > >> > > Looks like because of a mail server message rate restriction, > >> > > only 31 of 57 patches went through in the first attempt > >> > > > >> > > He submitted the remaining patches 32 to 57 in second attempt. > >> > > > >> > > I created a bundle for the series now. [1] > >> > > > >> > > Also a couple of patches were stuck at the gate. > >> > > So a proper build has not happened on the patchset yet. [2] > >> > > Do we have a way to trigger a build on the bundle? > >> > > > >> > > Please advise. > >> > > > >> > > [1] https://patchwork.dpdk.org/bundle/ajitkhaparde/BNXT%2025.11/ > >> > > [2] > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2025-October/921500.html > >> > > > >> > > Thanks > >> > > Ajit > >> > >> > >> > >> >